Animals
Health
Environment
Technology
History
Strange News
Space & Astronomy
Society
While sex in space is now a front and center topic of talk in public space travel circles, it may be far more complex and foreboding than once thought.
More research is needed in the role of gravity and its impact on the human body, said James Logan, a veteran NASA space physician speaking at a NewSpace conference gathering - but voicing his personal views.
“Sex in micro-g might be a little underwhelming. That is, the fantasy might be vastly superior to the reality. It’s a pretty messy environment…for every action there’s an equal and opposite reaction,” Logan told an attentive audience over the weekend at the NewSpace 2006 meeting in Las Vegas, Nevada, sponsored by the Space Frontier Foundation.
Sex in zero-g is going to have to be more or less choreographed, “otherwise it’s just going to be a wild fling,” Logan advised. But for those looking forward to space migration and setting up self-perpetuating civilizations off-Earth, the space physician raised several warning flags.
After the 26th gestational week of fetus development, lack of gravity delays skeletal development necessary for sitting, standing and walking, Logan said. Building adequate and proper neural connections after birth – requires movement under gravity, he added.
And after 3.8 billion years, everything on planet Earth has changed, Logan noted, except for one constant: gravity.
“In my opinion,” Logan continued, “the prospect of doing a single jump from 3.8 billion years of one-gravity into some kind of a weightless civilization is extremely naïve.”
In the 45th year of human spaceflight “we still do not have an inkling of what the gravity prescription is,” Logan said. “Think of gravity as a medication. We don’t know the dose. We don’t the frequency. And we don’t know the side effects.”
For the long term, the tall pole in the tent is life sciences research, Logan observed, including more work on radiation protection, as well as space structures that produce artificial gravity. He advised that space “pioneering” should be replaced with “bioneering”.
July 24th, 2006 at 10:56 am
[...] P.S. And speaking of breaking things in space…. [...]
July 24th, 2006 at 2:02 pm
What Do You Think Of The New Technorati?
Several bloggers are using “the MySpace crowd” as shorthand for who and what this redesign aims its hooks at. Fortunately there’s no jarring musical selection or colored type on a colored background. I get the hyperbole, but to some degree it sounds…
July 24th, 2006 at 6:41 pm
[...] LiveScience.com Blogs »Blog Archive » Sex in Space: Getting a Grip on Gravity [...]
July 28th, 2006 at 4:25 pm
There’s a new BOOK called “Sex in Space” coming out in August!
It’s not a textbook, but is written by a well respected science writer - Laura Woodmansee. The author’s web site is http://www.laurawoodmansee.com. All the details are there. I’m gettin’ a copy!
August 10th, 2006 at 6:01 am
I am an engineer and I have written an article about artificial gravity spacecraft. If you would like to read it, send me, richdoran@erols.com an e-mail with “Gravity” in the subject line.
January 6th, 2007 at 9:04 am
[...] Enough of the spiritual significance and creative husbandry of bovines. Let’s talk about human reproductive possibilities in space! Leonard David explores Sex in Space: Getting a Grip on Gravity for us from the perspective of the… um… mechanical issues we’ve all wondered about. He quotes NASA physician James Logan describing the logistics as “a wild fling” unless the adventurers care to choreograph things a bit. And even then a child born in the micro-g atmosphere of a colonization ship, wouldn’t develop the proper skeletal strength to tolerate real gravity, or the neural brain connections to move well in a gravitational field. Thus, he says, we won’t be sending colonists out for extended travels to other planets until we figure out how to simulate gravity on our spaceships. [...]