THIS IMAGE CAN ONLY BE USED IF WE INCLUDE A TEXT LINK IN THE STORY TO 3DSCIENCE.COM. See Rob for details.
You may not know it, but you're part virus.
At least, some of your genes come from viruses that slipped their DNA into the genes of our primate ancestors millions of years ago.
The DNA remnants of these ancient "retroviruses," distant relatives of today's HIV, account for an estimated 8 percent of the human genetic code and may have enabled master genes that account for some of the differences between us and our chimpanzee relatives.
Not all genes are created equal; the master genes can turn the others on and off, thus gaining control over genes related to cell division, DNA repair and programmed cell death. (This regulation of genes allows for tighter control of gene expression (i.e. which genes are turned on or off), which can account for the wide differences between humans and other apes, despite our very similar genetic codes.)
One such gene, called p53, has the job of coordinating the surveillance system that monitors the well-being of cells. It is so important in this job that when it fails, cancer is often the result—biologists even call it the "guardian of the genome."
Scientists had long wondered how genes such as p53 built their powerful empire over other genes. A new study detailed this week in the online edition of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences implicates the ancient retroviruses as the force behind p53's rise to power.
Scientists at the University of California, Santa Cruz, analyzed and compared genetic data from different species and found that certain retroviruses entered the genome about 40 million years ago and spread rapidly in primates about 25 million years ago.
Earlier research had shown that the DNA remnants of retroviruses like to jump around in the genetic code, and it's this movement into new positions throughout the human genome that spread copies of repetitive DNA sequences, which in turn allowed p53 to regulate many other genes, the UCSC team said. (The association between the sequences and gene regulation had been suspected as far back as 1971.)
"This would have provided a mechanism to quickly establish a gene regulatory network in a very short evolutionary time frame," said lead researcher Ting Wang.
The results also call into question previous views that these repetitive sequences, or so-called junk-DNA, didn't code for anything or serve a particular purpose.
"We're starting to uncover the treasure in this junk," Wang said.