The case against daylight saving, from a neurologist and sleep expert

While that "extra" hour of sunlight in the evenings can be exhilarating, it comes with significant health trade-offs.

photo of a woman's hands holding a large table-top alarm clock and adjusting the time
"Springing forward" is connected with negative health effects, an expert explains.
(Image credit: Kinga Krzeminska via Getty Images)

As people in the U.S. prepare to set their clocks ahead one hour on Sunday, March 10, 2024, I find myself bracing for the annual ritual of media stories about the disruptions to daily routines caused by switching from standard time to daylight saving time.

About one-third of Americans say they don't look forward to these twice-yearly time changes. And nearly two-thirds would like to eliminate them completely, compared with 17% who aren't sure and 21% who would like to keep moving their clocks back and forth.

Beth Ann Malow
Professor of Neurology and Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University

My research has focused on the impact of treating sleep disorders on neurological disease, and in autism, although I have also become involved in recent years in mitigating vaccine hesitancy and enhancing climate change communication. I hold an endowed chair, the Burry Chair in Cognitive Childhood Development and serve as Vice Chair for Academic Affairs in our Department of Neurology. In addition to conducting my own NIH and foundation-funded patient-oriented research, I have taken an active role in facilitating patient-oriented research through my involvement as Director of Clinical Translational Research for the Vanderbilt Kennedy Center for Developmental Disabilities. I direct the Vanderbilt Sleep Disorders Division. My pursuits outside of work involve being a national moderator for Braver Angels, focused on bridging the political divide. I am also an active member of Toastmasters International.