Roman Empire grew after catastrophic volcanic eruption, study finds

Research shows that A.D. 536 was not the worst year to be alive.

A painting of the Battle of Nineveh
An anachronistic depiction of the Battle of Nineveh between the eastern Romans and the Persians in 627, painted in 1452 by Pierro della Francesca.
(Image credit: Wikimedia CommonsCC BY-NC-ND)

Why empires fall is a question that fascinates many. But in the search for an answer, imagination can run wild. Suggestions have emerged in recent decades that attribute the rise and fall of ancient empires such as the Roman Empire to climate change and disease. This has prompted discussions over whether "536 was the worst year to be alive".

That year, a volcanic eruption created a dust veil that blocked the sun in certain regions of the world. This, combined with a series of volcanic eruptions in the following decade, is claimed to have caused a decrease in the global temperature. Between 541 and 544, there was also the first and most severe documented occurrence of the Justinianic plague in the eastern Roman Empire (also referred to as the Byzantine Empire), in which millions of people died.

Lev Cosijns
PhD Candidate in the School of Archaeology, University of Oxford

Lev Cosijns is a PhD candidate in Archaeological Science at the School of Archaeology at the University of Oxford. She uses archaeological methods to study the rise and decline of civilizations and cultures, especially during periods of transition. Her PhD thesis investigates Bronze Age society through diet and mobility in the Intermediate and Middle Bronze Age Southern Levant.