SpaceX rockets keep tearing blood-red 'atmospheric holes' in the sky, and scientists are concerned

A large streak of red light left behind when a SpaceX rocket punched a hole in the ionosphere above Arizona in July. (Image credit: Jeremy Perez)

De-orbiting SpaceX rockets are smashing temporary holes in the upper atmosphere, creating bright blobs of light in the sky. Now, scientists have warned that these "SpaceX auroras," which look like glowing red orbs of light, could be causing unrecognized problems — though they are not a threat to the environment or life on Earth.   

Researchers have known for decades that launching rockets into space can punch holes in the upper ionosphere — the part of the atmosphere between 50 and 400 miles (80 and 644 kilometers) above Earth's surface where gas is ionized, or stripped of electrons. These "ionospheric holes" can excite gas molecules in this part of the atmosphere and trigger vibrant streaks of red, aurora-like light. 

For example, in July, a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket, which was carrying Starlink satellites into orbit, ripped open a hole above Arizona that made the sky bleed. And, in September, a U.S. Space Force rocket accidentally punched an ionospheric hole above California, which created a faint red glow.

Now, astronomers at the McDonald Observatory in Texas have spotted similar but unique red lights appearing long after SpaceX's Falcon 9 rockets have left Earth's atmosphere. These lights, which are smaller and more spherical than the long streaks created by launching rockets, are the result of ionospheric holes carved out by the rockets' secondary boosters as they fall back to Earth after detaching from the rockets, Spaceweather.com reported.

Astronomers spotted the first of these SpaceX auroras above the observatory in February, and now are seeing "2 to 5 of them each month," Stephen Hummel, an astronomer and outreach program coordinator at McDonald Observatory, told Spaceweather.com. The red orbs are "very bright" and "easily visible with the naked eye," he added.

Related: SpaceX's Starlink satellites are leaking radiation that's 'photobombing' our attempts to study the cosmos

SpaceX launches are becoming more frequent, which increases the chance of SpaceX auroras appearing. (Image credit: Getty Images)

Ascending rockets and de-orbiting boosters both trigger ionospheric holes by releasing fuel into the ionosphere, which causes ionized oxygen atoms to recombine, or turn back into regular gas molecules. 

This transformation excites the molecules and causes them to release red light, similar to when the gas is excited by solar radiation during traditional auroral displays. This essentially creates a hole in the surrounding plasma, or ionized gas. But the recombined molecules are are reionized, which closes up the holes within 10 to 20 minutes.

SpaceX's de-orbiting boosters release fuel during short burns in order to manouver the falling debris to touch down in the southern Atlantic Ocean instead of crashing onto land. The resulting holes typically form above the south-central U.S. around 90 minutes after launch at an altitude of about 185 miles (300 km), according to Spaceweather.com. These holes are smaller and more circular than the holes torn open by launching rockets, so the resulting lights are more spherical and do not linger as long. But they are appearing more frequently.

Just like the larger light shows, the ionospheric holes pose no danger to life on Earth's surface. However, "their impact on astronomical science is still being evaluated," Hummel said. As a result, it is "a growing area of attention" among researchers, he added.

Changes to the ionosphere can also disrupt shortwave radio communication and interfere with GPS signals, according to Spaceweather.com.

Studying these holes could also help scientists learn more about the ionosphere. 

"The ionospheric density is different night to night, so we can learn something about the efficiency of the [ionosphere's] chemistry by observing many events," Jeffrey Baumgardner, a physicist at Boston University, told Spaceweather.com.

Related: World's largest communication satellite is a photobombing menace, astronomers warn

The red blobs are not the only light shows created by SpaceX rockets. The company's rocket boosters spin and dump their leftover fuel in space before they de-orbit, which creates a cloud of tiny ice crystals. These crystals can occasionally reflect sunlight back toward Earth, and the illuminated fuel creates bright spirals in the night sky, known as "SpaceX spirals."

There have already been two major SpaceX spirals this year: The first was in January, which was spotted forming above Mauna Kea in Hawaii, and the second occurred in April, which shone during a traditional auroral display in Alaska.

The number of SpaceX launches is rapidly increasing so the auroras and spirals are both likely to become more common in the future.

Harry Baker
Senior Staff Writer

Harry is a U.K.-based senior staff writer at Live Science. He studied marine biology at the University of Exeter before training to become a journalist. He covers a wide range of topics including space exploration, planetary science, space weather, climate change, animal behavior, evolution and paleontology. His feature on the upcoming solar maximum was shortlisted in the "top scoop" category at the National Council for the Training of Journalists (NCTJ) Awards for Excellence in 2023. 

  • sbrandes
    A little over a year ago, I said that there will be a huge propaganda campaign against Elon Musk for allowing people to speak without being censored on Twitter. And this article is exactly that. Negative propaganda against Elon musk's interests. The nice thing about it is, at least this time around, we know it's intentional and we know it is because The Biden administration wants to silence anyone who opposes anything they approve. So thank you for the hit piece. You all are so predictable these days.

    And if anyone thinks I am inaccurate, let's wait to see what kind of responses I get to this comment.
    Reply
  • rhoffmore
    Two paragraphs of saying “SpaceX” before the article notes that the phenomena well predates and is not specific to only SpaceX … several mentions of blood and bleeding and tearing and punching. Gotta collect the clicks.

    tl;dr: the holes last 10 to 20 minutes, pose no health or environmental threat, the impact on astronomical science is being evaluated, they can also disrupt shortwave radio communication and interfere with GPS signals, and studying these holes could also help scientists learn more about the ionosphere.
    Reply
  • rhoffmore
    admin said:
    Astronomers have discovered a new type of "aurora" created by falling SpaceX rocket boosters that punch temporary holes in the ionosphere. Experts are concerned that these blood-red light shows could be causing unknown problems for astronomy and communication.

    SpaceX rockets keep tearing blood-red 'atmospheric holes' in the sky, and scientists are concerned : Read more
    Per the article: not newly discovered, not specific to SpaceX rockets. … but readers might be forgiven for thinking it… Considering how much the article was sprinkled with the name SpaceX.
    Reply
  • artbrau
    Disappointing writing.

    "For example, in July, a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket, which was carrying Starlink satellites into orbit, ripped open a hole above Arizona that made the sky bleed. And, in September, a U.S. Space Force rocket accidentally punched an ionospheric hole above California, which created a faint red glow."

    Wow! That sounds really bad and scary!

    Then:

    "But the recombined molecules are are reionized, which closes up the holes within 10 to 20 minutes."

    "Just like the larger light shows , the ionospheric holes pose no danger to life on Earth's surface. However, "their impact on astronomical science is still being evaluated," Hummel said. As a result, it is "a growing area of attention" among researchers, he added."

    Never mind.

    This is fodder for the tinfoil hat crowd, not science writing.
    Reply
  • firedevil
    sbrandes said:
    A little over a year ago, I said that there will be a huge propaganda campaign against Elon Musk for allowing people to speak without being censored on Twitter. And this article is exactly that. Negative propaganda against Elon musk's interests. The nice thing about it is, at least this time around, we know it's intentional and we know it is because The Biden administration wants to silence anyone who opposes anything they approve. So thank you for the hit piece. You all are so predictable these days.

    And if anyone thinks I am inaccurate, let's wait to see what kind of responses I get to this comment.
    You're absolutely correct
    Reply
  • Pepperdog23
    There is NOTHING new about this type of “aurora.” I grew up in Southern California in. The 1960’s and every time Vandenburg would host a launch, this view could be seen for hundreds of miles.
    Reply
  • dontcare123
    Pepperdog23 said:
    There is NOTHING new about this type of “aurora.” I grew up in Southern California in. The 1960’s and every time Vandenburg would host a launch, this view could be seen for hundreds of miles.
    Please read the article to see why this particular version is new to astronomers... aka people who study the sky and space for a living.

    "Now, astronomers at the McDonald Observatory in Texas have spotted similar but unique red lights appearing long after SpaceX's Falcon 9 rockets have left Earth's atmosphere. These lights, which are smaller and more spherical than the long streaks created by launching rockets, are the result of ionospheric holes carved out by the rockets' secondary boosters as they fall back to Earth after detaching from the rockets, Spaceweather.com reported."


    Key word there being "unique" as in... they have seen similar phenomena before, but the ones observed in these SpaceX launches have "unique" characteristics due their "unique" design.
    Reply
  • dontcare123
    artbrau said:
    Disappointing writing.

    "For example, in July, a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket, which was carrying Starlink satellites into orbit, ripped open a hole above Arizona that made the sky bleed. And, in September, a U.S. Space Force rocket accidentally punched an ionospheric hole above California, which created a faint red glow."

    Wow! That sounds really bad and scary!

    Then:

    "But the recombined molecules are are reionized, which closes up the holes within 10 to 20 minutes."

    "Just like the larger light shows , the ionospheric holes pose no danger to life on Earth's surface. However, "their impact on astronomical science is still being evaluated," Hummel said. As a result, it is "a growing area of attention" among researchers, he added."

    Never mind.

    This is fodder for the tinfoil hat crowd, not science writing.
    You skipped the next couple paragraphs (and the sub-header apparently) which contextualizes why researchers are concerned...

    "SpaceX's de-orbiting boosters release fuel during short burns in order to manouver the falling debris to touch down in the southern Atlantic Ocean instead of crashing onto land. The resulting holes typically form above the south-central U.S. around 90 minutes after launch at an altitude of about 185 miles (300 km), according to Spaceweather.com. These holes are smaller and more circular than the holes torn open by launching rockets, so the resulting lights are more spherical and do not linger as long. But they are appearing more frequently.

    ...

    Just like the larger light shows, the ionospheric holes pose no danger to life on Earth's surface. However, "their impact on astronomical science is still being evaluated," Hummel said. As a result, it is "a growing area of attention" among researchers, he added.

    Changes to the ionosphere can also disrupt shortwave radio communication and interfere with GPS signals, according to Spaceweather.com."

    So in other words... they are concerned not because of some "doomsday" scenario... but because of the potential for "unknown problems for astronomy and communication"... aka... exactly what the sub-header said. You might want to read the whole article next time... or at the very least... read the sub-header.
    Reply
  • dontcare123
    rhoffmore said:
    Two paragraphs of saying “SpaceX” before the article notes that the phenomena well predates and is not specific to only SpaceX … several mentions of blood and bleeding and tearing and punching. Gotta collect the clicks.

    tl;dr: the holes last 10 to 20 minutes, pose no health or environmental threat, the impact on astronomical science is being evaluated, they can also disrupt shortwave radio communication and interfere with GPS signals, and studying these holes could also help scientists learn more about the ionosphere.
    Inaccurate summary. The article states that the types of holes are unique to SpaceX rockets as SpaceX rockets have a unique design.

    "Now, astronomers at the McDonald Observatory in Texas have spotted similar but unique red lights appearing long after SpaceX's Falcon 9 rockets have left Earth's atmosphere. These lights, which are smaller and more spherical than the long streaks created by launching rockets, are the result of ionospheric holes carved out by the rockets' secondary boosters as they fall back to Earth after detaching from the rockets, Spaceweather.com reported.

    ...
    SpaceX's de-orbiting boosters release fuel during short burns in order to manouver the falling debris to touch down in the southern Atlantic Ocean instead of crashing onto land. The resulting holes typically form above the south-central U.S. around 90 minutes after launch at an altitude of about 185 miles (300 km), according to Spaceweather.com. These holes are smaller and more circular than the holes torn open by launching rockets, so the resulting lights are more spherical and do not linger as long. But they are appearing more frequently."

    The rest is accurate though.... but just thought the idea that it wasn't unique tp SpaceX needed to be corrected as it is unique to SpaceX in the sense that no other rockets are punching holes in the ionosphere as frequently nor in the same way as SpaceX
    Reply
  • dontcare123
    rhoffmore said:
    Per the article: not newly discovered, not specific to SpaceX rockets. … but readers might be forgiven for thinking it… Considering how much the article was sprinkled with the name SpaceX.
    Also per the article... the specific types of holes are UNIQUE to SpaceX rockets.


    "Now, astronomers at the McDonald Observatory in Texas have spotted similar but unique red lights appearing long after SpaceX's Falcon 9 rockets have left Earth's atmosphere. These lights, which are smaller and more spherical than the long streaks created by launching rockets, are the result of ionospheric holes carved out by the rockets' secondary boosters as they fall back to Earth after detaching from the rockets, Spaceweather.com reported.

    ...
    SpaceX's de-orbiting boosters release fuel during short burns in order to manouver the falling debris to touch down in the southern Atlantic Ocean instead of crashing onto land. The resulting holes typically form above the south-central U.S. around 90 minutes after launch at an altitude of about 185 miles (300 km), according to Spaceweather.com. These holes are smaller and more circular than the holes torn open by launching rockets, so the resulting lights are more spherical and do not linger as long. But they are appearing more frequently."


    How are none of you guys reading the part of the article where it specifically states the holes punched by SpaceX rockets have unique characteristics and appear more frequently than other rockets?
    Reply