New View on Hurricanes Could Yield Better Predictions
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Delivered Daily
Daily Newsletter
Sign up for the latest discoveries, groundbreaking research and fascinating breakthroughs that impact you and the wider world direct to your inbox.
Once a week
Life's Little Mysteries
Feed your curiosity with an exclusive mystery every week, solved with science and delivered direct to your inbox before it's seen anywhere else.
Once a week
How It Works
Sign up to our free science & technology newsletter for your weekly fix of fascinating articles, quick quizzes, amazing images, and more
Delivered daily
Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
Once a month
Watch This Space
Sign up to our monthly entertainment newsletter to keep up with all our coverage of the latest sci-fi and space movies, tv shows, games and books.
Once a week
Night Sky This Week
Discover this week's must-see night sky events, moon phases, and stunning astrophotos. Sign up for our skywatching newsletter and explore the universe with us!
Join the club
Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.
A new hurricane monitoring technique may be better at detecting sudden bursts in a storm’s activity, such as the one that surprised Florida residents when Hurricane Charley hit in 2004, say the researchers who developed it.
Using a radar network, the technique will provide a detailed 3-D view of any hurricane approaching the Atlantic and Gulf coasts every six minutes, whereas current techniques can only update information about a storm every few hours.
“With this technique, meteorologists for the first time will be able to monitor the strength of a hurricane every few minutes as it approaches landfall and quickly alert coastal communities if it suddenly intensifies or weakens,” said one of the meteorologists who developed the system, Wen-Chau Lee of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR).
Currently, aircraft drop instruments into the swirling winds of a storm to provide forecasters with the critical information to make predictions about a hurricane’s path and strength.
These readings do well while the hurricane is out at sea, but can miss the sudden intensification or de-intensification of a storm during the critical 10 to 15 hours before landfall.
For example, residents of the southwest coast of Florida were caught by surprise when Hurricane Charley suddenly intensified from a Category 2 to a Category 4 storm with winds of more than 145 miles per hour just six hours before it made landfall in 2004. Charley devastated Captiva Island and nearby Fort Myers, causing about $15 billion of damage and making it the fourth costliest hurricane in U. S. history.
To test their new technique, which ties together information from a Doppler radar with general knowledge of hurricane structure, the researchers retroactively applied it to Hurricane Charley.
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
They were able to accurately predict Charley’s sudden burst of activity—a prediction that would have been useful to Floridians in 2004, to say the least. The study’s results were published in a recent issue of the journal Geophysical Research Letters.
“Our research shows that this technique can capture sudden intensity changes in potentially dangerous hurricanes,” said study team member Michael Bell, also of NCAR.
The team plans to test their technique during the 2007 hurricane season, which begins Friday, June 1.
- 2007 Hurricane Guide
- When a Hurricane Approaches, Should I Open the Windows or Tape Them?
- Natural Disasters: Top 10 U.S. Threats
- Images: Hurricanes at Eye Level

Andrea Thompson is an associate editor at Scientific American, where she covers sustainability, energy and the environment. Prior to that, she was a senior writer covering climate science at Climate Central and a reporter and editor at Live Science, where she primarily covered Earth science and the environment. She holds a graduate degree in science health and environmental reporting from New York University, as well as a bachelor of science and and masters of science in atmospheric chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology.
