Debunked: Red Wine Antioxidant Won't Help You Live Longer
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Delivered Daily
Daily Newsletter
Sign up for the latest discoveries, groundbreaking research and fascinating breakthroughs that impact you and the wider world direct to your inbox.
Once a week
Life's Little Mysteries
Feed your curiosity with an exclusive mystery every week, solved with science and delivered direct to your inbox before it's seen anywhere else.
Once a week
How It Works
Sign up to our free science & technology newsletter for your weekly fix of fascinating articles, quick quizzes, amazing images, and more
Delivered daily
Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
Once a month
Watch This Space
Sign up to our monthly entertainment newsletter to keep up with all our coverage of the latest sci-fi and space movies, tv shows, games and books.
Once a week
Night Sky This Week
Discover this week's must-see night sky events, moon phases, and stunning astrophotos. Sign up for our skywatching newsletter and explore the universe with us!
Join the club
Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.
Resveratrol — an antioxidant found in foods and drinks such as red wine, chocolate and grapes — has been purported to have anti-aging effects, but a new study suggests the compound may not help people live longer after all.
In the study of about 800 older adults in Italy, people who ate a resveratrol-rich diet were just as likely to die over a nine-year period, compared with those who consumed small amounts of the compound.
In addition, consuming high amounts of resveratrol was not linked with a reduced risk of heart disease or cancer. [7 Ways Alcohol Affects Your Health]
Resveratrol has been shown to reduce inflammation in animal studies as well as increase the life span of mice. And in people, it has been suggested that consuming high levels of resveratrol through supplements might reduce cholesterol levels and have other heart and anti-cancer benefits. But few studies have looked at whether resveratrol has benefits at the levels typically found in the human diet.
"The thinking was that certain foods are good for you because they contain resveratrol," study researcher Dr. Richard Semba, of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, said in a statement. "We didn't find that at all."
But red wine, dark chocolate and grapes may still be good for the heart and have other benefits, Semba said. However, the benefits may not be due to resveratrol, he added.
The study involved 783 adults ages 65 and older living in the Chianti region of Italy, where consumption of red wine is common. At the study's start, participants gave urine samples over a 24-hour period, which were then analyzed for resveratrol metabolites, or break-down products. Participants were divided into four groups based on the amount of resveratrol metabolites in their urine.
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
During the nine years over which the participants were followed, 268 died. Participants from each of the four resveratrol groups were equally likely to die during the study (about a third in each group).
The findings suggest that resveratrol alone may not have health benefits, so taking resveratrol supplements "might not be worth it," said Dr. Suzanne Steinbaum, a preventive cardiologist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York, who was not involved in the study.
However, red wine, dark chocolate and berries can still be part of a heart-healthy diet, because they contain other antioxidant compounds, known as bioflavonoids, that have been shown to decrease inflammation and blood clotting, Steinbaum said.
Being heart-healthy is about the big picture, and not a "magic pill," she said.
The study is published online today (May 12) in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine.
Follow Rachael Rettner @RachaelRettner. Follow Live Science @livescience, Facebook & Google+. Original article on Live Science.

Rachael is a Live Science contributor, and was a former channel editor and senior writer for Live Science between 2010 and 2022. She has a master's degree in journalism from New York University's Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program. She also holds a B.S. in molecular biology and an M.S. in biology from the University of California, San Diego. Her work has appeared in Scienceline, The Washington Post and Scientific American.
