Giant, 82-foot lizard fish discovered on UK beach could be largest marine reptile ever found

A washed-up Ichthyotitan severnensis carcass on the beach.
A washed-up carcass of the species on the beach. (Image credit: Sergey Krasovskiy, CC-BY 4.0)

Scientists have unearthed the remains of a gigantic, 200 million-year-old sea monster that may be the largest marine reptile ever discovered.

The newfound creature is a member of a group called ichthyosaurs, which were among the dominant sea predators during the Mesozoic era (251.9 million to 66 million years ago). The newly described species lived during the end of the Triassic period (251.9 million to 201.4 million years ago).

Ichthyosaurs had already attained massive sizes by the early portion of the Mesozoic, but it was not until the late Triassic that the largest species emerged.

While the Mesozoic is known as the age of the dinosaurs, ichthyosaurs were not themselves dinosaurs. Instead, they evolved from another group of reptiles. Their evolutionary path closely mirrors that of whales, which evolved from terrestrial mammals that later returned to the sea. And like whales, they breathed air and gave birth to live young.

The newly discovered ichthyosaur species was unearthed in pieces between 2020 and 2022 at Blue Anchor, Somerset in the United Kingdom. The first chunk of the fossil was noticed atop a rock on the beach, indicating that a passerby had found it and set it there for others to examine, the researchers explained in the paper. The researchers published their findings April 17 in the journal PLOS One.

The reptile's remains are made up of a series of 12 fragments from a surangular bone, which is found in the upper portion of the lower jaw. The researchers estimate the bone was 6.5 feet (2 meters) long and that the living animal was about 82 feet (25 m) long.

The researchers named the sea monster Ichthyotitan severnensis, meaning giant lizard fish of the Severn, after the Severn Estuary where it was found. The team believes it is not only a new species but an entirely new genus of ichthyosaur. More than 100 species are already known.

A giant pair of swimming Ichthyotitan severnensis. (Image credit: Gabriel Ugueto, CC-BY 4.0)

A number of rib fragments and a coprolite, or fossilized feces, were found in the area as well, but they were not definitively attributed to the same animal.

The sediments in which these specimens were found contained rocks that indicated earthquakes and tsunamis occurred during that time, which suggests that this species lived during a time of intense volcanic activity that may have led to a massive extinction event at the end of the Triassic according to the researchers.

A similar specimen was discovered in Lilstock, Somerset in 2016 and described in 2018. Both were found in what is known at the Westbury Mudstone Formation, within 6 miles (10 kilometers) of each other. This ichthyosaur was estimated to have been as much as 85 feet (26 m) long, although the authors of the latest study believe it was slightly smaller.

The previous contender for the largest marine reptile was another ichthyosaur, Shonisaurus sikanniensis, which was up to 69 feet (21 m) long. S. sikanniensis appeared 13 million years earlier than I. severnensis and was found in British Columbia, making it unlikely that the new discovery represents another specimen of the previously known species.

A similarly massive ichthyosaur called Himalayasaurus tibetensis, which may have reached lengths of 49 feet (15 m), was discovered in Tibet and described in 1972. It dates to the same period, meaning that it probably is not the same species as the new discovery either.

I. severnensis was likely among the last of the giant ichthyosaurs, the researchers claim. Ichthyosaurs persisted into the Cenomanian Age (100.5 million to 93.9 million years ago) of the late Cretaceous period (100.5 million to 66 million years ago). They were eventually supplanted by plesiosaurs — long-necked marine reptiles that went extinct at the end of the Cretaceous, alongside all non-avian dinosaurs.


Dictionary of Dinosaurs: An Illustrated A to Z of Every Dinosaur Ever Discovered — $12.00 on Amazon

Dictionary of Dinosaurs: An Illustrated A to Z of Every Dinosaur Ever Discovered — $12.00 on Amazon

Although this massive ichthyosaur was a giant reptile, it shared the planet with other incredible creatures — the dinosaurs. These awesome creatures came in all shapes and sizes, and are beautifully illustrated in the book "Dictionary of Dinosaurs" by Dieter Braun. From the enormous Argentinosaurus  to the pint-sized Zephyrosaurus, we loved its bite-sized facts, and it's well worth grabbing a copy if your kids love dinos as much as we do.

Richard Pallardy
Live Science Contributor

Richard Pallardy is a freelance science writer based in Chicago. He has written for such publications as National GeographicScience MagazineNew Scientist, and Discover Magazine

  • akiprev
    Richard, better try surfing or like.
    If it lived "200 million years ago," the "first chunk of the fossil" couldn't be "noticed atop a rock on the beach."
    Just google for the rate erosion rates before writing. Or use common sense.
    Reply
  • dmcd
    The more I've that melts from the poles, the more these creatures will be seen! Evidence of a young earth will become indisputable as well... 200 million? Please!
    Reply
  • GodAlmighty
    akiprev said:
    Richard, better try surfing or like.
    If it lived "200 million years ago," the "first chunk of the fossil" couldn't be "noticed atop a rock on the beach."
    Just google for the rate erosion rates before writing. Or use common sense.
    Go and smoke some more pot surfer kid. Reality denier. Millions of year old fossils are commonly discovered on British beaches due to coastal erosion and hugely deep cliff strata spanning eons. Smoke another.
    Reply
  • akiprev
    GodAlmighty said:
    Go and smoke some more pot surfer kid. Reality denier. Millions of year old fossils are commonly discovered on British beaches due to coastal erosion and hugely deep cliff strata spanning eons. Smoke another.
    So the coastal erosion is so picky то leave discernible sticking fossils? I suggested using some common sense.
    Reply
  • Temp1
    akiprev said:
    Richard, better try surfing or like.
    If it lived "200 million years ago," the "first chunk of the fossil" couldn't be "noticed atop a rock on the beach."
    Just google for the rate erosion rates before writing. Or use common sense.
    Or you could read the entire article


    . The first chunk of the fossil was noticed atop a rock on the beach, indicating that a passerby had found it and set it there for others to examine, the researchers explained in the paper
    Reply
  • Treeverse
    I actually have a picture of a current lizard fish, as they call it on my TikTok Twizmoon9$, to me tho it should fit a category like eel, snake, alligator, crocodile, or something else besides lizard or fish bc they things the current"version" or modern day ancestors of this prohistoric reptile are superior to their counterparts in most fresh water and salt and brackish waters here where I live in Florida. They dominate the food chain and they thick bulky scales make them often too much work for birds of prey, bigger water predators, and bears and other land dwelling predators, plus the nasty bite they pack with at least a hundred teeth on 1-2 foot long ones who would want that as a meal, this specific species presents a similar problem in a ecosystem as piranhas in my opinion, also they can't bend they body much side to side they have limited movement so I imagine they like floating on top of water so they can dive and catch prey.
    Reply
  • Mikey7a
    All that I can think to to say is; "You're going to need a bigger boat!". All jokes aside, what an amazing discovery. Does anyone know if they have put the whole fossil together, and if so is it being displayed anywhere?
    Reply
  • akiprev
    Temp1 said:
    Or you could read the entire article


    . The first chunk of the fossil was noticed atop a rock on the beach, indicating that a passerby had found it and set it there for others to examine, the researchers explained in the paper
    So a passerby had found it. Sticking from the ground for 100 million years. Hm, to say the least.
    Temp1 said:
    Or you could read the entire article


    . The first chunk of the fossil was noticed atop a rock on the beach, indicating that a passerby had found it and set it there for others to examine, the researchers explained in the paper
    Ok, I overlooked it. But if the passenger had found it and put on display, it must have been a discernible part of the animal. But what would such a discernible part have been doing on the surface for 100 millions or billions or whatever years?
    Reply