Female moles grow testicles to fight through their brutal underground existence

Shown here, a mole called Talpa europaea, which is in the same genus as the Iberian mole (Talpa occidentalis).
Shown here, a mole called Talpa europaea, which is in the same genus as the Iberian mole (Talpa occidentalis). (Image credit: Andreas Steidlinger via iStock/Getty Images Plus)

If any animal understands the horrors of trench warfare, it has to be the mole. Faced with an enemy, there's no time for pleasantries. No place to hide. Aggression is all that matters.

To help them fight in this brutal world, evolution has granted the female mole a generous dose of 'roid rage' by tacking some testicles onto her ovaries – resulting in a unique bit of anatomy called an ovotestis.

Now, researchers have a better understanding of how this fascinating biological change came about.

"The sexual development of mammals is complex, although we have a reasonably good idea on how this process takes place," says geneticist Darío Lupiáñez from the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics.

"At a certain point, sexual development usually progresses in one direction or another, male or female. We wanted to know how evolution modulates this sequence of developmental events, enabling the intersexual features that we see in moles."

Just like a more typical mammalian ovary, ovotestes nurture and release eggs for fertilization. They also happen to have a lump of testicular tissue stuck to one side.

While it's not capable of making sperm cells, it does have what are known as Leydig cells for churning out a masculine-sized serving of androgens, or male sex hormones.

Usually the development of testicular tissue in mammals relies on the presence of a gene on the Y chromosome to ramp up testosterone production early in development.

Lacking a Y chromosome makes it a lot harder for an embryo to kick off the chain of events that produce testes. So just how it happens in female moles, which have two X chromosomes instead of an X and Y, has long been a mystery.

An in-depth analysis of their genomes now reveals just how this quirk of nature came about in the first place.

"We hypothesized that in moles, there are not only changes in the genes themselves, but particularly in the regulatory regions belonging to these genes," says geneticist Stefan Mundlos from the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics.

To test this, Mundlos and his colleagues pulled out all of the stops to map out the chromosomal remodeling the Iberian mole (Talpa occidentalis) underwent to modify their ovaries into testosterone factories.

We're talking not just mapping the gene activity in different regions of their sex organs, but a recording of the epigenetic edits to their DNA and an examination of datasets describing how entire mole chromosomes have changed structurally.

They compared their results with genomes in other animals, as well as specific genetic changes found in the American star-nosed mole (Condylura cristata); another critter with ovotestes.

The result is a better understanding of how the mole's genome has been shuffled around over time in order to deliver a perfectly timed dose of regulatory growth factors.

Specifically they found a region involved with testicular development is flipped, adding extra code to a region that activates the pro-testicular growth factor gene FGF9.

They also found two extra copies of a gene that controls for androgen synthesis

"The triplication appends additional regulatory sequences to the gene – which ultimately leads to an increased production of male sex hormones in the ovotestes of female moles, especially more testosterone," says lead author, Francisca Martinez Real from the Institute for Medical Genetics and Human Genetics in Germany.

Testing out these changes in transgenic mice resulted in females with similar amounts of androgens as the males, supporting the researchers' hypothesis of large scale genomic changes being responsible for the testosterone surge.

"Our findings are a good example of how important the three-dimensional organization of the genome is for evolution," says Lupiáñez.

"Nature makes use of the existing toolbox of developmental genes and merely rearranges them to create a characteristic such as intersexuality. In the process, other organ systems and development are not affected."

To the female mole, the evolution of intersex has been a winning formula for survival.

Far from being aberrations, the blurring of lines throughout the animal kingdom is a constant reminder that Mother Nature simply doesn't give a hoot about clear boundaries between male and female.

This research was published in Science.

This article was originally published by ScienceAlert. Read the original article here.

Mike McRae
ScienceAlert

Mike McRae is a part-time Journalist at ScienceAlert. He has been telling science stories in one form or another for more than 20 years, and expertly navigates a broad range of subjects, from health and neuroscience to the weirdness of quantum physics. From classroom teacher to journalist, Mike has contributed to the CSIRO's magazines, The Guardian, the ABC and Australian Financial Review. He is the author of popular science books "Tribal Science: Brains, Beliefs," and "Bad ideas and Unwell: What Makes a Disease a Disease?" Mike is slowly building a collection of cephalopod tattoos on his right arm and swears there's still room for a nautilus or two.

  • ajweberman
    Good news for women who wish to transition to men.
    Reply
  • Dobbes7356
    ajweberman said:
    Good news for women who wish to transition to men.
    Not really. As the study states they are there because of the nature of genet
    admin said:
    To help moles fight in the brutal underground world, evolution has granted the female mole a generous dose of 'roid rage' by tacking some testicles onto her ovaries.

    Female moles grow testicles to fight through their brutal underground existence : Read more
    Not really. This is obviously a survival development in specific species linked to genetic and epigenetic factors in the genome itself. This wouldn't be applied to the Homo sapiens species.
    Additionally, no matter that quip about "Nature" not givng "a hoot about male and female boundaries". It/She/He actually does as it is in the nature of needing that androgen boost for the species to survive. The XY moles do not and cannot bear young. And it is still only the female who have ovotestes and need the male XY to provide the sperm. They are literally not hermaphroditic.
    The females apparently need the boost of extra androgen to survive their existence and produce the young to continue the species.
    Anthropogenitically tying this to human politics is not really a sound issue.
    Reply