Skip to main content

Could genetics explain why some COVID-19 patients fare worse than others?

antibodies attaching to sars-cov-2
(Image: © Shutterstock)

Certain genetic differences might separate people who fall severely ill with COVID-19 from those who contract the infection but hardly develop a cough, a new preliminary study suggests. 

The research is still in its early days, though, experts say.

The immune system can react to viruses thanks, in part, to specific genes that help cells spot unfamiliar bugs when they enter the body. The genes, known as human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes, contain instructions to build proteins that bind to bits of a pathogen; those proteins serve as warning flags to alert immune cells. The immune cells, once trained to recognize these bits, jumpstart the process of building antibodies to target and destroy the invasive germ. 

Within each individual, HLA genes code for three different classes of proteins; in other words, HLAs come in a variety of flavors, and depending on which HLAs you have, your body may be better or worse equipped to fight off certain germs — including SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. 

In a new study, published April 17 in the Journal of Virology, researchers used computer models to predict which combination of HLAs might be best at binding SARS-CoV-2, and which might be worst.

If certain HLAs can bind well to a large proportion of the virus's proteins, "we expect there to be a more protective immune response," authors Abhinav Nellore and Dr. Reid Thompson, who lead a computational biology research group at the Oregon Health and Science University, told Live Science in an email. A better bind means that the viral proteins are more likely to be presented to immune cells and prompt the production of specific antibodies, the authors said. 

"If the interaction is not stable, you will not have a proper [immune] response," said Dr. Shokrollah Elahi, an associate professor in the Department of Dentistry and adjunct associate professor in the Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology at the University of Alberta, who was not involved in the study. 

Related: 10 deadly diseases that hopped across species

But a stable bond, alone, does not guarantee the best immune response, Elahi added. If an HLA binds a viral protein that happens to be critical for the germ to replicate and survive, the subsequent antibody activity will likely target the virus more effectively than that prompted by a less important protein, Elahi said.   

"This is an issue we did not address in our analysis," the authors noted. Instead, the team focused on predicting how well different HLA types could bind to bits of SARS-CoV-2. Their analysis identified six HLA types with a high capacity to bind different SARS-CoV-2 protein sequences, and three with a low capacity to do so. Specifically, a HLA type known as HLA-B*46:01 had the lowest predicted capacity to bind to bits of SARS-CoV-2. 

The same HLA type cropped up in a 2003 study published in the journal BMC Medical Genetics, which assessed patients infected with SARS-CoV, a closely related coronavirus that caused an outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in the early 2000s. The study found that, in a group of patients of Asian descent, the presence of HLA-B*46:01 was associated with severe cases of the infection. In their paper, the research group noted that more clinical data would be needed to confirm the connection — and the same goes for the new study of SARS-CoV-2, Nellore and Thompson said. 

"The most substantial limitation of our study is that this was conducted entirely on a computer and did not involve clinical data from COVID-19 patients," the authors said. "Unless and until the findings we present here are clinically validated, they should not be employed for any clinical purposes," they added. 

"In the body, we have so many things interacting," Elahi said. HLAs represent just one piece of a large, intricate puzzle that comprises the human immune system, he said. To better understand the variety of immune responses to COVID-19, Elahi and his research group aim to assess markers of immune system activity in infected patients and also catalog the ratio of immune cell types present in their bodies. While taking age, sex and other demographic factors into account, these so-called immunological profiles could help pinpoint when and why the illness takes a turn in some patients. 

The clinical data could be assessed in parallel with genetic data gathered from the same patients, Elahi added. Similarly, Nellore and Thompson said that "COVID-19 testing should be paired with HLA typing, wherever [and] whenever possible," to help determine how different HLA types relate to symptom severity, if at all. Partnerships with genetic testing companies, biobanks and organ transplant registries could also offer opportunities to study HLA types in larger populations of people, they said. 

"We cannot in good conscience predict at this point who will be more or less susceptible to the virus because we have not analyzed any clinical outcomes data with respect to HLA type to know that any of our predictions are valid," the authors said. If future studies support the notion that some HLA genes protect people from the virus, while others place patients at greater risk, those in the latter group could be first in line for vaccination, they added. 

"In addition to prioritizing vaccinating the elderly or those with preexisting conditions, one could prioritize vaccinating people with HLA genotypes that suggest the SARS-CoV-2 virus is more likely to give them worse symptoms." 

The authors went on to analyze how well HLAs can bind SARS-CoV-2 as compared with other coronaviruses, such as those that cause the common cold and infect humans often. They identified several viral bits shared between SARS-CoV-2 and at least one of these common viruses, suggesting exposure to one germ could somewhat protect the body against the other.

"If someone was previously exposed to a more common coronavirus and had the right HLA types ... then it is theoretically possible that they could also generate an earlier immune response against the novel SARS-CoV-2," the authors said. On the other hand, exposure to a similar virus could leave the body ill-equipped to fight off the new one, if, for instance, "the body is using an old set of tools that aren't ideally suited to address the new problem," the authors said.

Originally published on Live Science. 

OFFER: Save 45% on 'How It Works' 'All About Space' and 'All About History'!

For a limited time, you can take out a digital subscription to any of our best-selling science magazines for just $2.38 per month, or 45% off the standard price for the first three months.View Deal

  • khuber
    My personal experience tells me epigenetics, i.e., nutrition, lifestyle choices and the thoughts you choose to think far outweigh genes because genes are just blueprints. You are your own architect and builder. Your choices in response to the environment determine which genes express.

    I used to get the flu. Now I do not get sick and have no need for a vaccine.
    Reply
  • Hayseed
    I think our immune system is cyclic. And your immune reaction depends on the phase of that cycle.
    Reply
  • khuber
    Hayseed said:
    I think our immune system is cyclic. And your immune reaction depends on the phase of that cycle.
    Everything cyclic, even the vibrations of atoms, so yes, I think you are correct in postulating the immune system is cyclic as well.

    No one has looked to see if there are common frequencies one might perceive by studying immune function over time, over generations. My guess is there are.

    Cyclic means more than just a single cycle. Think energy which we perceive as vibrations.

    Cycles are complex. Everything, literally, is connected. At a bare minimum you would have regular, transverse waves interacting or superposing with longitudinal waves resulting in superficially apparent irregularity or chaos cloaking order.

    Longitudinal wave impacts might be nutrition, starvation, deficiencies, toxins, parasites, microorganisms both commensal and averse, etc. Even sun cycles which trigger droughts would impact immune system cycles.

    Energy flows where you focus your attention, so if you focus on robust health that too becomes a wave form that impacts any natural frequency of the immune system.
    Reply
  • Hayseed
    I was thinking a cyclic rate from the population of gut bacteria. Perhaps 3 to 7 weeks. The cycle is probably the result of several populations......and may vary within a range.

    This is just a totally wild guess from what I read.

    But I did notice cycles bringing wastewater treatments plants online, decades ago.
    Reply
  • khuber
    Hayseed said:
    I was thinking a cyclic rate from the population of gut bacteria. Perhaps 3 to 7 weeks. The cycle is probably the result of several populations......and may vary within a range.

    This is just a totally wild guess from what I read.

    But I did notice cycles bringing wastewater treatments plants online, decades ago.

    Gut microbiome is integral to the immune system. But keep in mind that what you eat is the primary determinant of the makeup of the microbiome. Fiber and fermented foods result in a larger proportion of "good" microbes. The quality of the water you drink also is critical. And it's not just a question of filtration of purification. Dr. Pollack at the University of Washington has published articles on Exclusion Zone water. There's also the idea of keeping the blood slightly alkaline, i.e., more negative ions, for health and this can be accomplished at least in part with food choices. I saw one article (not sure where) stating that when the blood turns more acidic microorganisms "spontaneously" appear in the blood, i.e., the constituent parts self-assemble when the blood environment favors organisms we perceive as pathogenic.

    Reductionism has served well for years, but it's time to put everything back together and understand how the parts join to make a whole functioning being.
    Reply
  • kdn
    khuber said:
    My personal experience tells me epigenetics, i.e., nutrition, lifestyle choices and the thoughts you choose to think far outweigh genes because genes are just blueprints. You are your own architect and builder. Your choices in response to the environment determine which genes express.

    I used to get the flu. Now I do not get sick and have no need for a vaccine.


    I fully agree with you regarding epigenetics.
    Reply
  • kdn
    Becoming stressed about anything decreases our immunity (the ability to fight off infections) –people can even get stressed about the possibility of getting this ‘terrible disease’ of Covid-19 and that itself can lead them to be more susceptible. Also many studies have demonstrated that stress reduction techniques (like practicing mindfulness) can reduce stress and also boost immunity. This would explain the individual differences in susceptibility to virus – it is not genes.
    Reply
  • Roberto Grobman
    Alternative studies have suggested a close link of comorbidity between hypertension and heart disease and COVID-19, which may be related to the fact that these patients normally receive ACE inhibitors, increasing the availability of ACE2 sites for the virus to infect cells.
    The “peak” of the binding protein of the new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 uses the same cell binding factor (ACE2) as SARS-CoV and uses the cellular protease TMPRSS2 for its activation. Existing, clinically approved drugs targeting TMPRSS2 can inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection of lung cells.
    Transmembrane serine protease type II (TMPRSS2) activates the coronavirus to enter cells that are naturally susceptible to infection in infected humans.
    SARS-CoV-2 uses the SARS55 CoV receptor, ACE2, for entry and the TMPRSS2 serine protease for protein S activation. A TMPRSS2 inhibitor approved for clinical use has blocked entry and may be a treatment option. Their results reveal important similarities between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV infection and identify a potential target for antiviral intervention. By the way the new genetic susceptibility test for the risk of coronavirus is very interesting. Check www.genexya.com
    Reply