Skip to main content

When will a COVID-19 vaccine be ready?

antibodies on the sars-cov-2 virus
(Image: © Shutterstock)

Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, recently said that a COVID-19 could take 12 to 18 months to develop, test and approve for public use. But new vaccines typically take years to earn approval — can we really expect a coronavirus vaccine to be ready by summer 2021?      

Experts told Live Science that, for any other vaccine, the timeline would be unrealistic. But given the current pressure to stave off the pandemic, a COVID-19 vaccine could be ready sooner, as long as scientists and regulatory agencies prove willing to take a few shortcuts. 

Here's why it probably can't be developed any sooner than 12 to 18 months.

Testing many options 

More than 60 candidate vaccines are now in development, worldwide, and several have entered early clinical trials in human volunteers, according to the World Health Organization

Related: Treatments for COVID-19: Drugs being tested against the coronavirus

Some groups aim to provoke an immune response in vaccinated people by introducing a weakened or dead SARS-CoV-2 virus, or pieces of the virus, into their bodies. The vaccines for measles, influenza, hepatitis B and the vaccinia virus, which causes smallpox, use these approaches, according to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Although tried-and-tested, using this approach to develop these conventional vaccines was labor-intensive, requiring scientists to isolate, culture and modify live viruses in the lab. 

That initial process of just creating a vaccine can take 3 to 6 months, "if you have a good animal model to test your product," Raul Andino-Pavlovsky, a professor in the Department of Microbiology and Immunology at the University of California, San Francisco, told Live Science. 

Given the current time crunch, some groups have opted for faster, if less conventional, approaches. 

The first COVID-19 vaccine to enter clinical trials in the United States, for example, uses a genetic molecule called mRNA as its base. Scientists generate the mRNA in the lab and, rather than directly injecting SARS-CoV-2 into patients, instead introduce this mRNA. By design, the vaccine should prompt human cells to build proteins found on the virus' surface and thus trigger a protective immune response against the coronavirus. Other groups aim to use related genetic material, including RNA and DNA, to build similar vaccines that would interfere with an earlier step in the protein construction process. 

Related: 10 deadly diseases that hopped across species

But there's one big hurdle for mRNA vaccines. We can't be sure they will work.

As of yet, no vaccine built from a germs' genetic material has ever earned approval, Bert Jacobs, a professor of virology at Arizona State University and member of the ASU Biodesign Institute's Center for Immunotherapy, Vaccines and Virotherapy, told Live Science. Despite the technology having existed for almost 30 years, RNA and DNA vaccines have not yet matched the protective power of existing vaccines, National Geographic reported

Assuming these unconventional COVID-19 vaccines pass initial safety tests, "will there be efficacy?" Jacobs said. "The animal models suggest it, but we'll have to wait and see." 

"Because of the emergency here, people are going to try many different solutions in parallel,"  Andino-Pavlovsky said. The key to trialing many vaccine candidates at once will be to share data openly between research groups, in order to identify promising products as soon as possible, he said. 

Metrics used to measure efficacy — whether a vaccine sparks an adequate response from a person’s immune system — in animal studies and early clinical trials will also need to be clearly defined, he added. In other words, researchers should be able to use these early studies to determine which vaccines to move forward with, which to modify and which to abandon. That whole process — from lab dish to animal studies — can take 3 to 6 months, Andino-Pavlovsky said. 

Challenges in vaccine development 

Designing a vaccine that grants immunity and causes minimal side effects is no simple task. A coronavirus vaccine, in particular, poses its own unique challenges. Although scientists did create candidate vaccines for the coronaviruses SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, these did not exit clinical trials or enter public use, partly because of lack of resources, Live Science previously reported.

"One of the things you have to be careful of when you're dealing with a coronavirus is the possibility of enhancement," Fauci said in an interview with the journal JAMA on April 8. Some vaccines cause a dangerous phenomenon known as antibody dependent enhancement (AED), which paradoxically leaves the body more vulnerable to severe illness after inoculation. 

Related: Could a 100-year-old vaccine protect against COVID-19?

Candidate vaccines for dengue virus, for example, have generated low levels of antibodies that guide the virus to vulnerable cells, rather than destroying the pathogen on sight, Stat News reported. Coronavirus vaccines for animal diseases and the human illness SARS triggered similar effects in animals, so there's some concern that a candidate vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 might do the same, according to an opinion piece published March 16 in the journal Nature. Scientists should watch for signs of AED in all upcoming COVID-19 vaccine trials, Fauci said. Determining whether enhancement is occurring could happen during initial animal studies, but "it is still unclear how we will look for AED," Jacobs said. 

"Once there is a good animal model which gives symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection, we can ask if vaccination decreases or enhances pathogenesis," he said. "These may be longer term studies that could take several months." The AED studies could be done in parallel with other animal trials to save time, Andino-Pavlovsky added.

There's another challenge too.

A successful coronavirus vaccine will snuff the spread of SARS-CoV-2 by reducing the number of new people infected, Andino-Pavlovsky said. COVID-19 infections typically take hold in so-called mucosal tissues that line the upper respiratory tract, and to effectively prevent viral spread, "you need to have immunity at the site of infection, in the nose, in the upper respiratory tract," he said. 

These initial hotspots of infection are easily permeated by infectious pathogens. A specialized fleet of immune cells, separate from those that patrol tissues throughout the body, are responsible for protecting these vulnerable tissues. The immune cells that protect mucosal tissue are generated by cells called lymphocytes that remain nearby, according to the textbook “Immunobiology: The Immune System in Health and Disease” (Garland Science, 2001). 

"It's like your local police department," Andino-Pavlovsky told Live Science. But not all vaccines prompt a strong response from the mucosal immune system, he said. The seasonal influenza vaccine, for example, does not reliably trigger a mucosal immune response in all patients, which partly explains why some people still catch the respiratory disease after being vaccinated, he said.

Even if a COVID-19 vaccine can jumpstart the necessary immune response, researchers aren’t sure how long that immunity might last, Jacobs added. While research suggests that the coronavirus doesn't mutate quickly, "we have seasonal coronaviruses that come, year in [and] year out, and they don't change much year to year," he said. Despite hardly changing form, the four coronaviruses that cause the common cold keep infecting people — so why haven't we built up immunity?

Perhaps, there’s something odd about the virus itself, specifically in its antigens, viral proteins that can be recognized by the immune system, and that causes immunity to wear off. Alternatively, coronaviruses may somehow fiddle with the immune system itself, and that could explain the drop-off in immunity over time, Andino-Pavlovsky said. To ensure a vaccine can grant long-term immunity against SARS-CoV-2, scientists will have to address these questions. In the short term, they'll have to design experiments to challenge the immune system after vaccination and test its resilience through time, Jacobs said. 

In a mouse model, such studies could take "at least a couple of months," he said. Scientists cannot conduct an equivalent experiment in humans, but can instead compare natural infection rates in vaccinated people to those of unvaccinated people in a long-term study.

"When you have the luxury, you look at this for five years, 10 years to see what happens," Andino-Pavlovsky added.

Shortcuts to approval 

Unlike an antiviral treatment for COVID-19 that can be given to patients already infected with the virus, a vaccine must be tested in diverse populations of healthy people. 

"Because you give it to healthy people, there's an enormous pressure to make sure it's absolutely safe," Andino-Pavlovsky said. What's more, the vaccine must work well for people of many ages, including the elderly, whose weakened immune systems place them at heightened risk of serious COVID-19 infection. 

"Initially, safety studies will be done in small numbers of people," likely fewer than 100, Jacobs said. A vaccine may be approved based on these small studies, which can take place over a few months, and then continually monitored as larger populations become vaccinated, he added. "That's just my guess."

Related: COVID-19 is now the leading cause of death in the United States

A future vaccine may require an additional ingredient, called an adjuvant, that rallies the aged immune system into action, like that found in the shingles vaccine, Jacobs said. 

While some existing drugs, whose safety risks doctors understand, may be repurposed as COVID-19 treatments, equivalent data does not exist for a vaccine because no coronavirus vaccine has ever entered widespread use. Jacobs said he and his team aim to exploit a potential loophole to develop a powerful vaccine, fast. "We use surrogate live attenuated vaccines, where we put parts of SARS-CoV-2 into vaccinia virus [which guards against smallpox], and this can be done initially within a month," Jacobs said.  In general, many vaccine developers are starting from scratch. 

Despite the many challenges ahead, certain shortcuts could allow scientists to bring a COVID-19 vaccine faster than anticipated. 

First, partnering with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and other regulatory bodies can help scientists leap the logistical hurdles associated with clinical trials, such as recruiting healthy volunteers, Andino-Pavlovsky said. "It can save six months, doing that," he said. 

Any potential vaccine will need to pass a safety trial, known as a Phase 1 trial, which also helps determine the needed dose. The next step is a larger trial in 100 to 300 people, called a Phase 2, which looks for some biological activity, but can't say for sure if the drug is effective.  

If a vaccine candidate prompts a promising immune response in Phase 2 clinical trials, after passing safety tests in Phase 1, it's possible that the FDA could approve such a vaccine for emergency use "before the 18-month period that I said," Fauci said in the JAMA interview. 

"If you get neutralizing antibodies," which latch onto specific structures on the virus and neutralize it, "I think you can keep moving forward on it," Jacobs said. Normally, a vaccine would then enter Phase 3 clinical trials, which include hundreds to thousands of people.

So adding up these steps, each of which will likely take 3 to 6 months, it's very unlikely we would be able to find a vaccine that is safe and effective in less than 12 months — even if many of these steps could be done in parallel.

Then comes the issue of manufacturing billions and billions of doses of a new vaccine whose ingredients we don't yet know. Bill Gates has said that the Gates Foundation will fund the construction of factories for seven coronavirus vaccine candidates, equipping the sites to produce a wide variety of vaccine types, Business Insider reported

"Even though we'll end up picking at most two of them, we're going to fund factories for all seven, just so that we don't waste time in serially saying, 'OK, which vaccine works?' and then building the factory," Gates said.

Even if a fairly promising vaccine surfaces by 2021, and can be mass-produced, the search won't end there. "Especially with trying to get something out this quickly, we may not get the best vaccine out there right away," Jacobs said. Ideally, an initial vaccine will grant immunity for at least one to two years, but should that immunity wane, a longer lasting vaccine may have to be deployed. Historically, so-called live attenuated vaccines that contain a weakened virus tend to perform most reliably over extended periods of time, Andino-Pavlovsky said.        

"That may be what we need in the long run," he said. And research into coronavirus immunity should continue, regardless, "not only for COVID-19, but for the next coronavirus that comes."

Originally published on Live Science. 

OFFER: Save 45% on 'How It Works' 'All About Space' and 'All About History'!

For a limited time, you can take out a digital subscription to any of our best-selling science magazines for just $2.38 per month, or 45% off the standard price for the first three months.View Deal

  • anonymous.comment
    The acronym for Antibody-dependent enhancement is ADE, not AED.
    Reply
  • HamyMac
    admin said:
    Health officials have said that a vaccine could be ready next year, if we take some shortcuts.

    When will a COVID-19 vaccine be ready? : Read more
    Can someone explain to me the difference between finding a Covid19 vaccine and finding a vaccine for HIV? In 2009 the structure of the HIV genome was decoded. The Covid19 code is yet to be fully decoded, so how exactly can anyone be promising a vaccine in the next twelve months, let alone twelve years if no-one has been able as yet to produce a vaccine for HIV?
    The rumours abound on the internet, of course, but... a very sad and ominous question arises if governments are promising a vaccine at all. Does there already exist a vaccine that is simply being witheld as an act of war or at best an act of procrastination until some other objective is reached? It may seem preposterous to imply that governments are at war with their own people, but we protest at the totalitarianism in other countries, yet believe it absurd that such a thing could happen here. If Covid19 has revealed anything it is that people matter very much less than money, infrastructure productivity and services. It is as though Covid19 is being used as a test to see how few people are needed to keep society off its knees.
    There is also the coincidence that the victims of Covid19 are also generally the victims in society, the old and the poor, largely ethnic, communities. There has lately been the reluctant admission (again only reported online) that Covid19 was 'accidentally' carried by an intern working in a lab in Wuhan where they were studying the virus. Um, if they already 'had' Covid19 in a lab,, how did it get there? Was it, as they say 'discovered in bats' and brought in to study, or was it actually manufactured there and bats and wet markets merely cited as the scapegoat?
    repeat, I don't really like the taste of conspiracy theories. They attract unusually odd and extreme thinkers and rarely offer scientific validation, but this is the opposite. We have a real life global emergency about which things get fuzzier the deeper we go.
    The real problem, I suspect, is that the promise of a vaccine is designed to delay the appreciation that the situation, curves or none, is going to deteriorate more rapidly than anyone in power can cope with. They are delivering deflections and promises in order to forestall the obvious prospect of civil unrest, a phemonenon already becoming a reality in some of the more tenuous regimes, like the Phillipines and some African states, not to mention India and Pakisan.
    They have 'no idea' when or where this vaccine is going to come from, yet Bill Gates has promised that as soon as it does he will have ready five mega-factories to manufacture and distribute it. How? The WHO, to whom Gates is a majority contributor also sponsors the Global Vaccination Action Plan who held Event 201 in 2019 to project and sandbox a response to a global pandemic. The predictions of Event 201 are eerily accurate, right down to the tenor of the media coverage.
    So, to ask when a vaccine will be ready for Covid19 becomes something of a connundrum in itself. There is no vaccine. There may never be a vaccine. It may be as elusive as the HIV vaccine that has been the stuff of dreams for nearly forty years. It may be decided by the powers that be that, though distressing, the Covid19 cat did not disturb too many pigeons after all and that we must all take our chances.
    We are living in a dreamland if we think magic, science or technology will provide us with a get out of jail card on demand.

    This is probably not the forum that would appreciate the question and I do not like being a doubter, but the handling of Covid19 has been eccentric around the world to say the least, especially so in the US and the UK.
    Reply
  • OldCrow87
    HamyMac said:
    Can someone explain to me the difference between finding a Covid19 vaccine and finding a vaccine for HIV? In 2009 the structure of the HIV genome was decoded. The Covid19 code is yet to be fully decoded, so how exactly can anyone be promising a vaccine in the next twelve months, let alone twelve years if no-one has been able as yet to produce a vaccine for HIV?
    The rumours abound on the internet, of course, but... a very sad and ominous question arises if governments are promising a vaccine at all. Does there already exist a vaccine that is simply being witheld as an act of war or at best an act of procrastination until some other objective is reached? It may seem preposterous to imply that governments are at war with their own people, but we protest at the totalitarianism in other countries, yet believe it absurd that such a thing could happen here. If Covid19 has revealed anything it is that people matter very much less than money, infrastructure productivity and services. It is as though Covid19 is being used as a test to see how few people are needed to keep society off its knees.
    There is also the coincidence that the victims of Covid19 are also generally the victims in society, the old and the poor, largely ethnic, communities. There has lately been the reluctant admission (again only reported online) that Covid19 was 'accidentally' carried by an intern working in a lab in Wuhan where they were studying the virus. Um, if they already 'had' Covid19 in a lab,, how did it get there? Was it, as they say 'discovered in bats' and brought in to study, or was it actually manufactured there and bats and wet markets merely cited as the scapegoat?
    repeat, I don't really like the taste of conspiracy theories. They attract unusually odd and extreme thinkers and rarely offer scientific validation, but this is the opposite. We have a real life global emergency about which things get fuzzier the deeper we go.
    The real problem, I suspect, is that the promise of a vaccine is designed to delay the appreciation that the situation, curves or none, is going to deteriorate more rapidly than anyone in power can cope with. They are delivering deflections and promises in order to forestall the obvious prospect of civil unrest, a phemonenon already becoming a reality in some of the more tenuous regimes, like the Phillipines and some African states, not to mention India and Pakisan.
    They have 'no idea' when or where this vaccine is going to come from, yet Bill Gates has promised that as soon as it does he will have ready five mega-factories to manufacture and distribute it. How? The WHO, to whom Gates is a majority contributor also sponsors the Global Vaccination Action Plan who held Event 201 in 2019 to project and sandbox a response to a global pandemic. The predictions of Event 201 are eerily accurate, right down to the tenor of the media coverage.
    So, to ask when a vaccine will be ready for Covid19 becomes something of a connundrum in itself. There is no vaccine. There may never be a vaccine. It may be as elusive as the HIV vaccine that has been the stuff of dreams for nearly forty years. It may be decided by the powers that be that, though distressing, the Covid19 cat did not disturb too many pigeons after all and that we must all take our chances.
    We are living in a dreamland if we think magic, science or technology will provide us with a get out of jail card on demand.

    This is probably not the forum that would appreciate the question and I do not like being a doubter, but the handling of Covid19 has been eccentric around the world to say the least, especially so in the US and the UK.
    I'm an engineer not a biologist of any kind so the vaccine question is beyond my ken. But one thing is certain as a historical fact, 1: Government will grow and assume more power and taxes, 2: Our civil liberties will be curtailed. And that growth and limits will not reverse after this event
    Reply