One of the largest freshwater fish in the world may be extinct.
In a new paper, scientists led by Hui Zhang of the Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences in Wuhan, China, argued that the Chinese paddlefish (Psephurus gladius) is no more, probably having gone extinct sometime between 2005 and 2010. The fish was once common in the Yangtze River in China, the researchers wrote, but overfishing and habitat fragmentation sealed the species' doom. And there is no hope for bringing it back.
"As no individuals exist in captivity and no living tissues are conserved for potential resurrection, the fish should be considered extinct according to the IUCN Red List criteria," Zhang and his colleagues wrote in a paper published in the March 2020 issue of the journal Science of the Total Environment, referring to the International Union for Conservation of Nature's list of threatened and endangered species.
The Chinese paddlefish was an impressive creature, with a large, protruding snout. This nose gave the fish one of its nicknames, xiang yu, or "elephant fish" in Mandarin. The paddlefish could grow as long as 23 feet (7 meters), according to anecdotal evidence, putting it among sturgeon and alligator gar as the largest freshwater fish in the world.
Paddlefish were caught regularly in the Yangtze River as late as the 1970s, according to Zhang and his colleagues. In 1981, a major dam, the Gezhouba Dam, was built in the river and split the Chinese paddlefish population in two.
The dam also prevented fish trapped below it from swimming upstream to tributaries where they could spawn. The species was listed as one of China's most threatened animals in 1989, but the population continued to decline despite that listing. The last sighting of a Chinese paddlefish was in 2003.
Now, Zhang and his team wrote, the paddlefish is gone. The researchers scoured records of sightings dating back to 1981 and conducted field surveys in 2017 and 2018 of the Yangtze and its tributaries and lakes: the Yalong River, the Heng River, the Min River, the Tuo River, the Chishui River, the Jialing River, the Wu River, the Han River, Dongting Lake and Poyang Lake. The researchers set up fishing nets to capture species in these waterways and surveyed local fish markets, looking for evidence that this paddlefish species might still be caught.
They found 332 species of fish but not a single Chinese paddlefish. The historical sighting data suggested that few of the paddlefish were seen after about 1995. The evidence suggested that the fish upstream of the dam became functionally extinct — unable to reproduce in the natural environment — by about 1993. The species hung on until around 2005, or perhaps 2010 at the latest, the researchers said.
"Based on the weight of the evidence, the species can be declared as extinct with high certainty," the researchers wrote.
The loss of the Chinese paddlefish holds lessons for how to ensure the survival of other threatened Yangtze species, the researchers wrote. First, more-frequent surveys of the river basin would allow scientists to keep closer tabs on what species are struggling. Before the 2017 survey conducted by Zhang and his team, the last comprehensive fish survey of the Yangtze and its tributaries occurred in 1975. Second, rescue efforts should begin much more quickly, the researchers wrote. Most of the intense work done to save the Chinese paddlefish started after 2006, likely after the fish was gone. To prevent the species' extinction, rescue efforts should have started before 1993, when the fish became functionally extinct, the researchers said.
Many Yangtze species, such as the Chinese alligator (Alligator sinensis), are hanging by a thread, Zhang and his team wrote, but might still be saved. Prioritizing their survival now, before they pass the point of no return, may be the only way to save the enormous river's biodiversity, the researchers said.
- Photos: The Freakiest-Looking Fish
- In Photos: Spooky Deep-Sea Creatures
- Moonfish: The First Warm-Blooded Fish (Photos)
Editor's note: This article has been updated to indicate that the maximum length of 23 feet for the Chinese paddlefish may be based only on anecdotal, rather than verified, evidence, according to Solomon David, of the Nicholls State University, in Thibodaux, Louisiana.
Originally published on Live Science.
Sign up for the Live Science daily newsletter now
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
Stephanie Pappas is a contributing writer for Live Science, covering topics ranging from geoscience to archaeology to the human brain and behavior. She was previously a senior writer for Live Science but is now a freelancer based in Denver, Colorado, and regularly contributes to Scientific American and The Monitor, the monthly magazine of the American Psychological Association. Stephanie received a bachelor's degree in psychology from the University of South Carolina and a graduate certificate in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz.
It's Trumps' fault.Reply
First of all, it is a fish in China, so its fake news. Secondly, it can't be Trumps fault, because its climate change's fault. Finally, it was probably an Uighur or Falung Gong, so who cares.Reply
How do you know if this news is fake? The website that you're on is an actual factual website that gives you real information on what's going on, so you can't say that this news is fake when it's coming from a factual website. And the big things that helped this fishes' extinction were the creation of the dam and the lack of care that it was given when we knew it needed help. Plus, Uighur and Falcon Gong are NOT fishes, the Uighur are a group of religious people in Saudi Arabia and Falun Gong (you spelled it wrong by the way) is a Chinese religious practice. Research your terms before saying them to the public, you might accidentally make yourself look stupid.Reply
Not the brightest bulb in the drawer are ya?mike davis said:First of all, it is a fish in China, so its fake news. Secondly, it can't be Trumps fault, because its climate change's fault. Finally, it was probably an Uighur or Falung Gong, so who cares.
you sound idiotic, defending a random fish that no one cares about. It doesn't really matter.JjAy6 said:How do you know if this news is fake? The website that you're on is an actual factual website that gives you real information on what's going on, so you can't say that this news is fake when it's coming from a factual website. And the big things that helped this fishes' extinction were the creation of the dam and the lack of care that it was given when we knew it needed help. Plus, Uighur and Falcon Gong are NOT fishes, the Uighur are a group of religious people in Saudi Arabia and Falun Gong (you spelled it wrong by the way) is a Chinese religious practice. Research your terms before saying them to the public, you might accidentally make yourself look stupid.