'Love Hormone' Increases Trust, But Not Foolishness
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Delivered Daily
Daily Newsletter
Sign up for the latest discoveries, groundbreaking research and fascinating breakthroughs that impact you and the wider world direct to your inbox.
Once a week
Life's Little Mysteries
Feed your curiosity with an exclusive mystery every week, solved with science and delivered direct to your inbox before it's seen anywhere else.
Once a week
How It Works
Sign up to our free science & technology newsletter for your weekly fix of fascinating articles, quick quizzes, amazing images, and more
Delivered daily
Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
Once a month
Watch This Space
Sign up to our monthly entertainment newsletter to keep up with all our coverage of the latest sci-fi and space movies, tv shows, games and books.
Once a week
Night Sky This Week
Discover this week's must-see night sky events, moon phases, and stunning astrophotos. Sign up for our skywatching newsletter and explore the universe with us!
Join the club
Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.
A brain hormone thought to play a role in social bonding makes us more trusting, but not blind fools, a new study suggests.
Oxytocin, also dubbed the "love hormone," has been shown to aid in the connection between mother and child and between mates. Some studies have found that even sniffing oxytocin makes humans more trusting of others.
But researchers in Belgium wondered whether all those warm and fuzzy feelings might cloud our judgment, making us indiscriminately trusting and gullible.
To find out, Moïra Mikolajczak, of the Université catholique de Louvain in Belgium, and colleagues had 60 men (average age 21) take part in a trust game. Before the game, the men were either given a nasal spray containing either oxytocin or placebo. (The study included only men because men and women may respond differently to the hormone.)
The subjects were given a sum of money and told they could share some or all of it with a partner. Any amount they gave to their partner would automatically triple. However, the partner could then decide to keep all the money, or give some or all of it back. Subjects who are more trusting would be expected to share more money.
To help the participants determine whether their partner is trustworthy, partners were described as either reliable (for instance, "they practice first aid") or unreliable ("they play violent sports"). Participants also played against a computer, which randomly determined how much money to give back.
Participants who received the oxytocin gave more money to the reliable partners and to the computer than did participants who only received the placebo. In other words, the oxytocin recipients were more trusting of these entities. However, the trust effect vanished when it came to giving money to unreliable partners. Subjects who received oxytocin gave about the same amount to unreliable partners as subjects who received the placebo.
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
The findings suggest oxytocin's trust-inducing effects depend on the situation.
Essentially, the results suggest oxytocin is most effective at boosting trust when that increase in trust is likely to bring benefits yet it has no effect when conditions are shady and so more trust could be detrimental, the researchers wrote in the August issue of the journal Psychological Science. "Thus, the higher the perceived risk, the lower the trust-enhancing effect of [oxytocin]."

Rachael is a Live Science contributor, and was a former channel editor and senior writer for Live Science between 2010 and 2022. She has a master's degree in journalism from New York University's Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program. She also holds a B.S. in molecular biology and an M.S. in biology from the University of California, San Diego. Her work has appeared in Scienceline, The Washington Post and Scientific American.
