On Friday (April 17), China added 1,290 COVID-19 deaths to Wuhan's previous tally, bringing the total to 3,869 deaths, according to The New York Times. Officials also reported 325 additional cases of COVID-19 in Wuhan, bringing the city's case count to 50,333.
Officials said the new numbers are the result of a detailed investigation, and they now include deaths that occurred at home in the beginning of the outbreak, as well as deaths that were inaccurately reported by hospitals, the Times reported. Some of the reasons for the initial errors were an overwhelmed medical system as well as a delay in reporting, officials said.
—Coronavirus in the US: Map & cases
—What are coronavirus symptoms?
—How deadly is the new coronavirus?
—How long does coronavirus last on surfaces?
—Is there a cure for COVID-19?
—How does coronavirus compare with seasonal flu?
—How does the coronavirus spread?
—Can people spread the coronavirus after they recover?
A revised death and case count is not necessarily unexpected. Countries around the world are likely underreporting the real number of cases and deaths due to limited testing availability and an overwhelmed health care system, the Times reported.
But the revised tally also comes as a number of countries have questioned China's official numbers.
"They are on the defensive, clearly," Jean-Pierre Cabestan, a political science professor at Hong Kong Baptist University, told the Times. "It's an uphill battle now for China to improve its image."
Wuhan, a city of 11 million people, went under strict lockdown on Jan. 23, in an attempt to control the spread of the new coronavirus. The lockdown was recently lifted after the city reported only three new coronavirus cases of over a three-week period, Live Science previously reported.
- The 12 deadliest viruses on Earth
- 20 of the worst epidemics and pandemics in history
- Going viral: 6 new findings about viruses
Originally published on Live Science.
For a limited time, you can take out a digital subscription to any of our best-selling science magazines for just $2.38 per month, or 45% off the standard price for the first three months.
Sign up for the Live Science daily newsletter now
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
Rachael is a Live Science contributor, and was a former channel editor and senior writer for Live Science between 2010 and 2022. She has a master's degree in journalism from New York University's Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program. She also holds a B.S. in molecular biology and an M.S. in biology from the University of California, San Diego. Her work has appeared in Scienceline, The Washington Post and Scientific American.
3,869 ÷ 50,333 = .0768 × 100= 7.68% Death rate in Wuhan.Reply
Summer, based on those inaccurate numbers I am sure the death rate could be that high. But just like every country around the globe that is dealing with this mess, how many people that were infected and recovered and the need for more testing to see how the numbers play out. I have been to Wuhan, and based on what I have seen, and their health care system, I could seeing it be that high. But I was told by friends that live there that the death rate across the country is higher, but so is the spread of the disease, especially after the Chinese New Year, celebrations that took place.Reply