Scientists discover huge, heat-emitting blob on the far side of the moon

a map of the moon and its many craters, showing regions with more gravity in red and regions with less gravity in green and blue
A map of the moon's far side taken by NASA's Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission. Recent observations of the moon's far side revealed a strange heat anomaly that could be a long-dead volcano. (Image credit: NASA/ARC/MIT)

Scientists have discovered an anomalous blob of heat on the far side of the moon. 

This mysterious hotspot has a strange origin: It's likely caused by the natural radiation emanating from a huge buried mass of granite, which is rarely found in large quantities outside of Earth, according to new research. On the moon, a dead volcano that hasn't erupted for 3.5 billion years is likely the source of this unusual hunk of granite. 

"This is more Earth-like than we had imagined can be produced on the Moon, which lacks the water and plate tectonics that help granites form on Earth," lead study author Matt Siegler of the Planetary Science Institute in Tucson, Arizona, said in a statement.

Siegler and his colleague Rita Economos of Southern Methodist University discovered the heat with a new method using microwaves to measure subsurface temperatures via the Chinese lunar orbiters Chang'E 1 and 2. They also used data from NASA's Lunar Prospector and Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiters.

What they found was an area about 31 miles (50 kilometers) across where the temperature is about 18 degrees Fahrenheit (10 degrees Celsius) warmer than the surroundings. This region was below a 12.4 mile (20 km) diameter spot on the surface that is rich in silicon and that is thought to be a collapsed volcanic crater. The dead volcano last erupted 3.5 billion years ago, but magma from its plumbing system is likely still sitting below the surface, giving off radiation. 

"This find is a 50 km-wide batholith; a batholith is a type of volcanic rock that forms when lava rises into the Earth's crust but does not erupt onto the surface," Economos said in the statement. "El Capitan and Half Dome, in Yosemite in California are examples of similar granite rocks which have risen to the surface." 

The researchers reported their initial findings in the journal Nature on July 5 and presented additional details July 12 at the Goldschmidt Conference on geochemistry in Lyon, France. 

The findings are "incredibly interesting," Stephen M. Elardo, a geochemist at the University of Florida who was not involved in the study, said in the statement. Granite is extremely common on Earth, but not elsewhere in the solar system, added Elardo.

"People don’t think twice about having a granite countertop in their kitchen," he said. "But geologically-speaking, it’s quite hard to make granite without water and plate tectonics, which is why we really don’t see that type of rock on other planets. So if this finding by Siegler and colleagues holds up, it’s going to be massively important for how we think about the internal workings of other rocky bodies in the Solar System."

Stephanie Pappas
Live Science Contributor

Stephanie Pappas is a contributing writer for Live Science, covering topics ranging from geoscience to archaeology to the human brain and behavior. She was previously a senior writer for Live Science but is now a freelancer based in Denver, Colorado, and regularly contributes to Scientific American and The Monitor, the monthly magazine of the American Psychological Association. Stephanie received a bachelor's degree in psychology from the University of South Carolina and a graduate certificate in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz. 

  • Majimoto
    If it is still thought that the moon resulted from detached mass from the Pacific Ocean area, as result of asteroid collision, then perhaps not surprising for residual magma to still be part of moon make up ??
    Reply
  • Wolf.Mom
    Majimoto said:
    If it is still thought that the moon resulted from detached mass from the Pacific Ocean area, as result of asteroid collision, then perhaps not surprising for residual magma to still be part of moon make up??


    I didn't know the details, but the same thought came to mind.
    Reply
  • gcherman56
    This makes sense when considering that the granitic crust was likely generated from a very-large impact that melted crustal rocks along deeply penetrating faults downrange of an oblique impact. My money is on the Mare Orientale foreland region. Impact tectogenesis baby!
    Reply