Scientists discover enzyme that can turn air into energy, unlocking potential new energy source

A scanning electron microscope image of a bacterium that can use atmospheric hydrogen to generate an electrical current.
A scanning electron microscope image of a bacterium that can use atmospheric hydrogen to generate an electrical current. (Image credit: Science Photo Library/Alamy Stock Photo)

Scientists studying a cousin of the bacteria responsible for tuberculosis and leprosy have discovered an enzyme that converts hydrogen into electricity, and they think it could be used to create a new, clean source of energy literally from thin air. 

The enzyme, which has been named Huc, is used by the bacterium Mycobacterium smegmatis to draw energy from atmospheric hydrogen, enabling it to survive in extreme, nutrient-poor environments.

Now, by extracting and studying the enzyme, the researchers say they have found a new energy source that could be used to power a range of small portable electrical devices. They published their findings March 8 in the journal Nature.

Related: Scientists find 'secret molecule' that allows bacteria to exhale electricity

"We imagine that a Huc-containing power source could power a range of small portable devices using air, including biometric sensors, environmental monitors, digital clocks, and calculators or simple computers," lead author Rhys Grinter, a microbiologist at Monash University in Australia, told Live Science via email. 

"When you provide Huc with more concentrated hydrogen, it produces more electrical current," he said. "Which means you could use it in fuel cells to power more complex devices, like smart watches, or smartphones, more portable complex computers, and possibly even a car."

M. smegmatis is a nonpathogenic, fast-growing bacterium often used in the lab to study the cell wall structure of its close, disease-causing relative, Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Commonly found in soil all over the world, M. smegmatis has long been known to convert trace hydrogen in the air into energy; in this way, the microbe can survive in the toughest environments, including Antarctic soils, volcanic craters and the deep ocean, where little other fuel can be found, the researchers said. 

But until now, how M. smegmatis did this was a pervading mystery.

To investigate the chemistry behind M. smegmatis' shocking ability, the scientists first isolated the Huc enzyme responsible for the process using chromatography — a lab technique which enables scientists to separate the components of a mixture. Then, they investigated the enzyme's atomic structure with cryo-electron microscopy, a technique that won its creators the 2017 Nobel Prize in chemistry. By beaming electrons onto a frozen sample of Huc that was gathered from M. smegmatis, the researchers mapped out the enzyme's atomic structure and the electrical pathways it uses to carry the electrons so that they form a current. 

The team discovered that at its center, Huc has a structure, called an active site, that contains charged ions of nickel and iron. Once hydrogen molecules (made up of two protons and two electrons) enter the active site, they become trapped between the nickel and iron ions and get stripped of their electrons. The enzyme then sends these electrons along in a flowing stream to generate a current.

"The electrons are absorbed by Huc (specifically the nickel ion), and transferred to the surface of Huc (by a molecular wire formed by clusters of iron and sulphur ions)," Grinter said. "If we immobilize Huc on an electrode, the electrons can enter an electrical circuit from the enzyme surface and generate current."

Further experiments revealed that the isolated Huc enzyme can be stored for prolonged periods; that it survives being frozen or heated up to 176 degrees Fahrenheit (80 degrees Celsius); and that it can consume hydrogen at concentrations as minuscule as 0.00005% of that found in the air we breathe. These attributes, alongside the microbe's ubiquity and ability to be easily grown, could make the enzyme an ideal candidate for a power source in organic batteries, the researchers say.

"Huc can extract energy from hydrogen in the air, which is effectively limitless," Grinter said. "The amount of electricity that can be generated from the low concentrations of hydrogen in the air will be modest. This will limit the application of Huc in this context to devices that require a small but sustained amount of power. A complementary use of Huc would be in fuel cells where a higher concentration of hydrogen is provided."

Ben Turner
Staff Writer

Ben Turner is a U.K. based staff writer at Live Science. He covers physics and astronomy, among other topics like tech and climate change. He graduated from University College London with a degree in particle physics before training as a journalist. When he's not writing, Ben enjoys reading literature, playing the guitar and embarrassing himself with chess.

  • Bluecloud
    "...turn air into energy"
    I assume you mean elctricity as producing energy is tricky.
    Reply
  • Debed
    Why not make a better version than can convert co2 into energy.
    it is all about stripping those electrodes anyway.
    Reply
  • Bluecloud
    Debed said:
    Why not make a better version than can convert co2 into energy.
    it is all about stripping those electrodes anyway.
    Hydrogen is far more reactive than CO2, so good luck with that. The energy required to break down a molecule of CO2 is far greater than any you might get out of it. Consider the production of hydrogen from water. electrolysis is extremely energy intensive. What those clever little enzymes are doing is simply releasing electrons from hydrogen, which is quite easy.
    Reply
  • bolide2
    Maybe this is a naïve question, but--after the electrons get stripped from the H₂ molecules and sent on their way, what happens to the protons? Is an electrical circuit formed, in which electrons from ... somewhere else ... are conveyed to the protons?
    Reply
  • Staran
    This article has a strange way of describing hydrogen molecules. The description could also be interpreted as describing a helium isotope (2 He-2). It should say something like "Once H2 hydrogen molecules (hydrogen made up of one proton and one electron each, for two protons and two electrons total in the molecule) enter the active site"...
    Reply
  • Staran
    bolide2 said:
    Maybe this is a naïve question, but--after the electrons get stripped from the H₂ molecules and sent on their way, what happens to the protons? Is an electrical circuit formed, in which electrons from ... somewhere else ... are conveyed to the protons?
    Yes, because +2 charge ions do not remain charged for long, and grab electrons from other neutral or negatively charged atoms/molecules, setting up a chain of electron exchanges.
    Reply
  • Debed
    Bluecloud said:
    Hydrogen is far more reactive than CO2, so good luck with that. The energy required to break down a molecule of CO2 is far greater than any you might get out of it. Consider the production of hydrogen from water. electrolysis is extremely energy intensive. What those clever little enzymes are doing is simply releasing electrons from hydrogen, which is quite easy.

    To mishandle a quote from Theodore Roosevelt:
    It is not worth doing if it is not hard.
    Reply
  • Juan
    Hola interesante noticia, pero me imagino a la población mundial consumiendo H2, ¿conocemos las consecuencias? Porque no abocarse y darle prioridad a solucionar el tema del CO2 en el aire y su impacto, que ir introduciendo mas variables a un sistema tan frágil como es nuestro planeta. tal vez sea útil para aplicarlo a misiones espaciales. Saludos.
    Reply
  • bolide2
    Staran said:
    Yes, because +2 charge ions do not remain charged for long, and grab electrons from other neutral or negatively charged atoms/molecules, setting up a chain of electron exchanges.
    So presumably the H₂ would "grab electrons" from something like O₂, releasing the energy of oxidation and H₂O as its waste product.
    Reply
  • Bruce Frank
    Bluecloud said:
    Hydrogen is far more reactive than CO2, so good luck with that. The energy required to break down a molecule of CO2 is far greater than any you might get out of it. Consider the production of hydrogen from water. electrolysis is extremely energy intensive. What those clever little enzymes are doing is simply releasing electrons from hydrogen, which is quite easy.
    But the implication is that there is a problem with CO₂. CO₂ is a necessary nourishment for all plant life on Earth. It is also a very inefficient greenhouse gas having virtually no impact on Earth's temps or climate. Many plant scientists say that the current 400 ppm verges at the starvation level for plant life. BTW, the oceans of the world are the repository for CO₂. Increases in CO₂ come from warming seas WITH AN 800 YEAR LAG TIME. Current levels are from warming of the oceans starting over 800 years ago.
    Reply