The first life on Earth could have evolved in warm pools of water on islands speckling a vast, planet-wide ocean.
The oldest confirmed life on Earth is 3.5 billion years old, only a billion years after the planet formed. Traces of possible life have also been found in rocks dating back 3.7 billion years and 3.95 billion years. These specimens are controversial, but they could hint that life evolved very soon after the planet's atmosphere and oceans developed.
The origins of said life are also controversial. Life — on Earth, anyway — requires basic building-block molecules (amino acids and nucleotides) to chemically react, forming complex molecules such as proteins, RNA and DNA. This transition from building blocks to long molecular chains is called polymerization, and it requires specific temperatures and conditions to occur.
Some scientists believe that the first microbial life emerged at undersea hydrothermal vents, which host the sort of chemical conditions that could encourage polymerization, according to research published in 2008 in the journal Nature Reviews Microbiology. Other scientists argue that vents put off too much heat for effective polymerization, and that an underwater environment also would make polymerization difficult. In this camp, researchers argue that life, instead, emerged at the edges of shallow ponds, heated by geothermal energy.
On solid ground?
For the warm-water pool hypothesis to work, though, early Earth needs to have hosted solid ground — no solid ground means no place to put warm-water pools. That's where the new study, published Jan. 4 in the journal Nature Geoscience, comes in. Geoscientists Jun Korenaga, at Yale University, and Juan Carlos Rosas, now at the Ensenada Center for Scientific Research and Higher Education in Mexico, are interested in understanding the topography of the Earth during the Archean era, 4 billion to 2.5 billion years ago. Chemist Jeffrey Bada, a proponent of the warm-pond hypothesis at Scripps Institution of Oceanography in San Diego, approached Korenaga and asked if there was any possibility of dry land during the Archaean.
Korenaga and Rosas used a computer model to recreate the conditions of the Archaean Earth. Today, Korenage told Live Science, new ocean floor forms at mid-ocean ridges, where rocks from deep within Earth’s middle layer, the mantle, rise up and melt, creating new oceanic crust. As this crust slides away from its origin at the mid-ocean ridge (which looks like an underwater mountain range), it cools and contracts, becoming denser and dropping in elevation.
Meanwhile, though, Earth has its own source of internal heat: radiogenic heating, put off by the decay of radioactive elements in the deep mantle. This heat tends to push upward, ultimately raising the elevation at the surface.
During the Archaean, this radiogenic heating was stronger. This means that even as the new oceanic crust cooled and contracted, it was pushed upward. This could have led to underwater seamounts — which tend to be circular, unlike mid-ocean ridges — being pushed up above sea level, forming islands.
"If you go back in time, you still have the same amount of cooling effect but much more warming effect from the deeper mantle, so this deeper part wins," Korenaga said.
Origin of life
The findings suggest that there could have been dry land on Earth well before the formation of large continents.
"This warm-water ponds hypothesis has a very solid geological foundation," Korenaga said.
That doesn't mean that the hypothesis is correct, of course; but the new study reveals that warm-water ponds can't be ruled out based on geology alone. Geochemists are working to figure out the constraints of life-friendly chemistry on land, Korenaga said. "It's a very rich subject."
Originally published on Live Science.
Live Science newsletter
Stay up to date on the latest science news by signing up for our Essentials newsletter.
Stephanie Pappas is a contributing writer for Live Science, covering topics ranging from geoscience to archaeology to the human brain and behavior. She was previously a senior writer for Live Science but is now a freelancer based in Denver, Colorado, and regularly contributes to Scientific American and The Monitor, the monthly magazine of the American Psychological Association. Stephanie received a bachelor's degree in psychology from the University of South Carolina and a graduate certificate in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz.