Fast Food Ads: Kids Seeing Less on TV, More on Social Media

potatoes, idaho, chips
One version of the most popular vegetable in the United States. (Image credit: Devonyu | Dreamstime.com)

BOSTON — Fast-food chains have made some improvements in their menus and marketing practices over the last few years, but these changes are likely not enough to reduce the overeating of high-calorie foods by children and teens, according to a new report.

In good news, fast-food TV ads viewed by children ages 6 to 11 decreased 10 percent between 2009 and 2012, according to the report, from researchers at the Yale Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity. And most fast-food restaurants now include some healthful side options, such as fruit and vegetables, in their kids' meals. McDonald's automatically includes a half-portion of apples in their child meals, the report said.

However, in 2012, children and teens still saw three to five fast-food ads on TV daily, the report found. And fast-food chains have stepped up their advertising on social media websites and mobile phone devices, which are popular with young people. [10 Ways to Promote Kids' Healthy Eating Habits]

"The progress really is mixed," said Jennifer Harris, director of marketing initiatives at the Rudd Center. While traditional TV advertising has gone down, "there are a lot of other ways restaurants are reaching children now," said Harris, who presented the report here today (Nov. 5) at the meeting of the American Public Health Association.

The researchers recommended that fast-food restaurants limit their children's TV and Web advertising to healthful foods only. The industry should also set age limits on its social media and mobile marketing, they said.

And most kids' meals should be changed to meet national nutrition standards, the report said. As of February, less than 1 percent of all kids' meal combinations (33 out of 5,427 possible meals) met nutrition standards, according to the report.

The new report is a follow-up to a 2010 study by the same researchers. For the update, the researchers examined menu items and advertising practices of 18 top fast-food restaurants in the United States.

Among the findings:

  • The amount of money spent on fast-food adverting in 2012 was $4.6 billion, an 8 percent increase from 2009.
  • Websites created by McDonald's, Burger King and Dairy Queen that targeted children were discontinued.
  • But Web display advertising — such as banner ads on other websites — for McDonald's Happy Meals increased 63 percent (Many of the ads appeared on kid's websites such as Nick.com.)
  • After McDonald's added apples as a default side to kids' meals (along with a half-portion of fries), the proportion of children getting apples at the restaurant tripled.
  • There was no change in the percentage of children ordering healthy beverages (such as milk or 100 percent juice), and the percentage of children ordering soda did not change over the study period. (In September, McDonald's said it would eventually stop advertising soda on kids' menus.)
  • A lot of advertising that used to appear on websites is moving to Facebook. In 2012, 6 billion fast- food ads appeared on the social networking site.
  • Games that promote products, called "adveragames," are now on cellphones.

While some fast-food chains have added healthy sides, there needs to be more effort to include wholesome main meals, with more whole grains and vegetables and less saturated fat, said Marlene B. Schwartz, director of the Rudd Center.

Follow Rachael Rettner @RachaelRettner. FollowLiveScience @livescience, Facebook&Google+. Original article on LiveScience.

Rachael Rettner
Contributor

Rachael is a Live Science contributor, and was a former channel editor and senior writer for Live Science between 2010 and 2022. She has a master's degree in journalism from New York University's Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program. She also holds a B.S. in molecular biology and an M.S. in biology from the University of California, San Diego. Her work has appeared in Scienceline, The Washington Post and Scientific American.