A catastrophic mud eruption in Indonesia blamed on drilling by an oil company might instead have natural causes, new research suggests.
In 2006, the largest mud volcano on the planet was born when steam, water and mud began erupting on the Indonesian island of Java. At its height, it spewed 6.3 million cubic feet (180,000 cubic meters) of boiling mud per day, enough to submerge a football field under nearly 110 feet (34 m) of earth. The mud volcano still erupts with outbursts like a geyser.
The resulting disaster, known as the Lusi mud eruption, buried factories and villages, causing 13,000 families to lose their homes. Scientists have suggested two potential causes for the calamity. The first possibility is that the eruption could have been triggered by drilling at a gas exploration well, Banjar-Panji-1, about 500 feet (150 m) from the mud volcano. The other possibility is that the outburst may have been set off by the magnitude-6.3 earthquake that struck about 150 miles (240 kilometers) away in Java at Yogyakarta just two days earlier, killing nearly 6,000 people. [Countdown: History's Most Destructive Volcanoes]
Oil and gas company Lapindo Brantas, which operated the well, claimed the eruption was due to natural causes. However, an international team of scientists held the company responsible, and the Indonesian government has held the company financially responsible, demanding it pay $420 million to cover restitution for the victims and aid efforts to stop the mud flow.
Now, another group of researchers suggest the Lusi mud eruption may actually have had a natural cause, triggered by amplified seismic waves from the preceding earthquake.
'Tectonics in action'
Stephen Miller, a geodynamicist at the University of Bonn in Germany, and his colleagues analyzed seismic data from the site of the mud volcano. They concentrated on a curved layer of rock that capped the mud reservoir.
Past research proposed that seismic waves from the preceding earthquake were too weak to trigger the mud eruption. However, computer simulations now suggest the curved layer of rock would serve as a lens to reflect, amplify and focus the quake's seismic waves, enough to liquefy the mud and set off the outburst.
"Lusi is tectonics in action," Miller said.
Not everyone agrees the eruption had natural causes, though.
"I am 99 percent certain this was caused by drilling activity," said Richard Davies, a petroleum geologist at Durham University in England who did not take part in this study. "The explanation is remarkably simple and not an uncommon problem.[Andrea Th1] [Charles C2] "
When a borehole is drilled, mud is used, Davies explained. Drilling mud has several purposes, one of which is to provide enough pressure in the hole to prevent fluid that occurs naturally in the rock from coming into the well and climbing to the surface.
The problem was, there was not enough mud in the hole in the early hours of May 28, 2006, "so underground fluid rushed into the hole, which led to a blowout, and the birth of the Lusi mud volcano," Davies asserted.
Davies questioned why earlier, larger earthquakes did not trigger Lusi before 2006.
"Our response to that is that the bigger earthquakes — meaning the 2004 magnitude-9.2 and 2005 magnitude-8.6 Sumatra earthquakes — were much more distant, about 2,000 kilometers [1,200 miles] away," Miller said. The seismic waves that reached Lusi were, therefore, much weaker. They were also a kind of wave that would interact with the curved rock layer at Lusi in ways that simulations revealed would prevent seismic energy from penetrating deep enough to reach the mud layer.
Although Miller and his colleagues think they have ruled out an artificial cause for the mud eruption, the company's drilling "was dangerous, in any case," he said. "Had the Yogyakarta earthquake not happened, they probably would have gotten away with it. But the earthquake happened, and their poorly designed borehole recorded the response of the mud layer to that earthquake."
The findings are detailed their findings online July 21 in the journal Nature Geoscience.
Editor's note: This story has been corrected to replace the word "retribution" with "restitution" and to clarify who held the drilling company responsible.
Follow LiveScience @livescience, Facebook & Google+. Original article on LiveScience.com .