White House Sees 'Radical' Climate Ideas as Last Resort
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Delivered Daily
Daily Newsletter
Sign up for the latest discoveries, groundbreaking research and fascinating breakthroughs that impact you and the wider world direct to your inbox.
Once a week
Life's Little Mysteries
Feed your curiosity with an exclusive mystery every week, solved with science and delivered direct to your inbox before it's seen anywhere else.
Once a week
How It Works
Sign up to our free science & technology newsletter for your weekly fix of fascinating articles, quick quizzes, amazing images, and more
Delivered daily
Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
Once a month
Watch This Space
Sign up to our monthly entertainment newsletter to keep up with all our coverage of the latest sci-fi and space movies, tv shows, games and books.
Once a week
Night Sky This Week
Discover this week's must-see night sky events, moon phases, and stunning astrophotos. Sign up for our skywatching newsletter and explore the universe with us!
Join the club
Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.
As a last resort, the White House would look at shooting particles into the atmosphere to cool the climate, Obama's new science adviser John Holdren told the Associated Press. Some media are playing up the "radical" aspect of the idea.
Well, it's certainly out there, and there's no agreement among scientists as to whether it'd be smart. Here's how it would work:
Certain types of aerosols, or tiny particles suspended in the air, are thought to have an overall cooling effect on the atmosphere. These particles intercept some solar radiation and scatter it back into space. The cooling effect on the Earth's climate can be seen after a volcanic eruption, which can spew millions of tons of sulfur into the atmosphere. Some scientists have suggested that we mimic nature and inject a bunch of sulfur into the atmosphere to counteract global warming. One problem with this plan is the increased amount of acid rain this would generate. Another is that sulfur would have to be regularly injected into the atmosphere to keep up the cooling, or global warming would pick up right where it left off.
Read more about this and 9 other wild and crazy environmental ideas we looked at recently as ways to improve the health of the planet, including such complex tasks as burying carbon underground and simple ideas like changing your diet.
Holdren (and presumably his boss) are worried we'll reach a tipping point on global warming before emissions can be reigned in. Like many scientists, the White House aims to reduce emissions. But how? That's fast becoming the multi-billion dollar question, as high-profile fuels like ethanol have not panned out as expected, and energy companies are not as excited about funding alternative projects as many had hoped.
Here are our recent analyses of 15 of the most viable alternatives:
Biodiesel, Clean Coal, Electric Cars, Ethanol, Geothermal Energy, Hybrid Vehicles, Hydrogen Vehicles, Nuclear Power, Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion, Power from Flowing Water & Waves, Solar Energy at Home, Solar Farms, Wind Power at Home, Wind Farms.
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
... And go here to vote on the one you think we should pour money into.
In our new Etc. format, LiveScience provides links to articles of interest around the web. It is in Beta.

