Scientists propose 'missing' law for the evolution of everything in the universe

Astronaut floating in space near Earth and moon.
A composite image of an astronaut floating in space. (Image credit: Peepo via Getty Images)

Researchers have proposed a "missing" scientific law for the evolution of life, minerals, planets, stars and pretty much everything else in the universe.

This new law identifies "universal concepts of selection" that drive systems to evolve, whether they're living or not. It addresses the tendency for natural systems in the universe to become more complex over time.

The research team behind the law, which included philosophers, astrobiologists, a theoretical physicist, a mineralogist and a data scientist, have called it "the law of increasing functional information."

"This was a true collaboration between scientists and philosophers to address one of the most profound mysteries of the cosmos: why do complex systems, including life, evolve toward greater functional information over time?" study co-author Jonathan Lunine, a physical science professor at Cornell University, said in a statement.

Lunine and his colleagues described their new law in a study published Oct. 16 in the journal PNAS.

Related: 'Doubly magic' form of oxygen may challenge a fundamental law of physics

 A scene from the 2005 film adaptation of "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy." (Image credit: Entertainment Pictures / Alamy Stock Photo)

Scientific laws are descriptions of observed phenomena. They don't explain why those phenomena exist or what causes them, but they advance our scientific understanding and provide a launching pad for future research.

The new law states that "the functional information of a system will increase (i.e., the system will evolve) if many different configurations of the system undergo selection for one or more functions," the researchers wrote in the study.

The law applies to systems that form from numerous components — such as atoms, molecules and cells — which can be arranged and rearranged repeatedly and adopt multiple different configurations, according to the statement. The law also says these configurations are selected based on function, and only a few survive.

Expanding Darwin's theory of evolution, the researchers claim that non-living systems also evolve when a novel configuration of components works and improves function. One example of a function is stability, according to the statement.

The scientific community is reacting to this new law. Commenting on a statement  from the Carnegie Science Earth and Planets Laboratory in Washington, D.C., theoretical biologist Stuart Kauffman, professor emeritus of biochemistry and biophysics at the University of Pennsylvania, said the study is a "superb, bold, broad, and transformational article," while Milan Cirkovic, a research professor at the Astronomical Observatory of Belgrade, called the study "a breeze of fresh air blowing over the difficult terrain at the trijunction of astrobiology, systems science and evolutionary theory."

However, The Guardian reported that not everyone is quite so taken with the law, including astronomer Martin Rees, professor emeritus of cosmology and astrophysics at the University of Cambridge.

"Given an immense amount of space and time, and the laws of physics and chemistry, an expanding variety of materials, environments and structures will emerge in the inanimate world," Rees said. "But I don’t see that this need be a manifestation of any new underlying principle analogous to the role of Darwinian selection via inheritance in the biological world."

Patrick Pester
Live Science Contributor

Patrick Pester is a freelance writer and previously a staff writer at Live Science. His background is in wildlife conservation and he has worked with endangered species around the world. Patrick holds a master's degree in international journalism from Cardiff University in the U.K.

  • Giovani
    admin said:
    The "law of increasing functional information" says that complex systems in nature evolve to become more complex.

    Scientists propose 'missing' law for the evolution of everything in the universe : Read more
    Fascinating. There seems to be a determined course for the evolution of evolving.
    Of course, there also has to be an end; a restart of entropy beginning another cycle.
    Make sense? Everything is always heading for a culmination. There is a degrading governor on all of this, causing a predictable zenith to momentum and then deterioration?
    It appears evolution is a product of this terminal state we are squarely within.
    Its always going somewhere isn't it?
    It isn't an open path but a predictable set of natural laws which in themselves are imperfect, meaning an end to all we know is a guarantee.
    Reply
  • RobertKlein
    So what is the mathematical expression for this law and do "complexity translates to entropy by any chance "
    Reply
  • Giovani
    RobertKlein said:
    So, what is the mathematical expression for this law and do "complexity translates to entropy by any chance "
    The mathematical expressions I leave for those with more I.Q. however, while there is no formula I know of, entropy drives or "complicates" complexity.
    Entropy wins any scenario. Whether complexity derives its evolution from a waning entropy, I certainly cannot comment, but perplexity is an offshoot of entropy.
    There are levels I believe, of entropy. Whether in the beginnings of a major civilization to its ending, or the entire cosmos, entropy is layered. It is supreme.
    Reply
  • wild guelder-rose.
    admin said:
    The "law of increasing functional information" says that complex systems in nature evolve to become more complex.

    Scientists propose 'missing' law for the evolution of everything in the universe : Read more
    It’s a shame your science is so intrusive regarding something that’s understood but is not an inheritance that others may receive.

    Wait until my family find out about the government and science working together and against someone who is already learning society issues and ignored with intention. It must be sexist male issues as per todays standards.

    Have a read if it isn’t fresh in your head
    https://archive.org/details/religioussensein00macduoft/page/n12/mode/1up
    Reply
  • bolide2
    Rather presumptuous to introduce this idea as a "law," isn't it? Perhaps we should call it a "hypothesis," which, if consistent with known facts, and well-supported by evidence, and showing some explanatory capability, may graduate to the status of "theory."
    Reply