The epidemiologist who led Sweden's controversial COVID-19 response, which did not involve a strict lockdown, now says that the country should have done more to stop the spread of the virus, according to news reports.
"If we were to run into the same disease, knowing exactly what we know about it today, I think we would end up doing something in between what Sweden did and what the rest of the world has done," Anders Tegnell, the state epidemiologist of the Public Health Agency of Sweden, told Swedish Radio on June 3, according to Reuters.
As compared with other countries in Europe, Sweden took a comparatively relaxed approach to COVID-19 by choosing not to institute strict lockdown policies, NPR reported in April. With no mandatory quarantine in place, museums, bars, restaurants, gyms, malls, schools and nightclubs remained open while residents were encouraged to follow guidelines for personal hygiene and social distancing.
Related: 11 (sometimes) deadly diseases that hopped across species
Health officials also banned gatherings of 50 or more people, recommended that residents avoid nonessential travel and encouraged those over age 70 to stay home as much as possible. In late March, Sweden prohibited residents from visiting nursing homes, but the measure did not prevent the virus from reaching elderly care facilities throughout the country.
As of June 4, Sweden has reported more than 4,500 deaths associated with the virus, according to the Johns Hopkins virus dashboard, and about half of those deaths occurred among elderly people living in nursing homes, Reuters reported.
The trend had already emerged in April, when Sweden's ambassador to the U.S., Karin Ulrika Olofsdotter, told NPR, "Once we know how the virus got into our elderly care facilities, the government can make recommendations and take measures to try to stop that, because that is the biggest tragedy of all this, that it has gotten into the nursing homes." Now, more than a month later, nursing homes still bear the brunt of Sweden's COVID-19 deaths.
"We have to admit that when it comes to elderly care and the spread of infection, that has not worked," Prime Minister Stefan Löfven told Swedish newspaper The Aftonbladet Daily, according to Reuters. "Too many old people have died here."
In late May, Sweden's overall COVID-19 mortality rate was estimated at 39.57 deaths per 100,000 residents; at the same time, the U.S. mortality rate was estimated at 30.02 deaths per 100,000 residents, according to NPR. Norway and Finland, both bordering Sweden, instituted stricter lockdown measures than their neighboring country, and at the time, each had fewer than six COVID-19 deaths per 100,000 residents.
The research group Ourworldindata.org now estimates that Sweden has the eighth highest number of coronavirus-related deaths per capita, Reuters reported.
Upon setting their COVID-19 strategy, Swedish officials including Olofsdotter predicted that the country might reach so-called herd immunity before countries under lockdown, according to NPR. Herd immunity refers to a point at which so many people gain immunity to a virus, either through natural infections or vaccinations, that the overall risk of new infections becomes very low. With too few people to infect, the virus can no longer spread rapidly.
Without an approved vaccine, experts estimate that 60% of the population would have to become infected and recover from COVID-19 to achieve herd immunity — assuming that every infection grants robust immunity that doesn't quickly wane through time, NPR reported. However, an antibody survey conducted in Stockholm suggested that fewer than 7.5% of the city's residents had been exposed to the virus as of mid-May.
With herd immunity on the distant horizon, and nearly 41,900 confirmed cases so far in the country, Tegnell said he still stands by Sweden's original COVID-19 strategy.
"We continue to believe the strategy is good but then there are always improvements one can make, especially if you look back over time," he said during a news briefing, according to Reuters. "It would be strange if you gave a different answer to that question."
On the other hand, Bjorn Olsen, a professor of Infectious Medicine at Uppsala University, called the strategy "one of Sweden's biggest embarrassments and most tragic events" in an interview with Reuters. "As long as people are dying, we must try to change."
Tegnell did say that, in hindsight, Sweden should have conducted much more widespread diagnostic testing and sooner, Reuters reported. Olsen echoed this point and added that the country should expand its capacity for contact tracing, to track and isolate new cases of infection before they spread.
- Going viral: 6 new findings about viruses
- The 12 deadliest viruses on Earth
- Top 10 mysterious diseases
Originally published on Live Science.
OFFER: Save 45% on 'How It Works' 'All About Space' and 'All About History'!
For a limited time, you can take out a digital subscription to any of our best-selling science magazines for just $2.38 per month, or 45% off the standard price for the first three months.
But let me first note that the title editor ran another lap, since the article itself describes how Sweden's response was not lax but measured, relying on science by the department of health under our "top epidemiologist". It has been described as mostly the same as in other nations.
"In an interview with Swedish Radio which was published on Wednesday, Anders Tegnell says that Sweden should have put in more measures at the beginning of the corona pandemic.
- If we were to encounter the same disease, with exactly what we know about it today, I think we would land in the middle of what Sweden did and what the rest of the world did, quite clearly.
The news, that the architect behind the world-unique - and heavily challenged - Swedish corona strategy is now self-critical became a world news.
But during Wednesday's press conference, Anders Tegnell points out that he is behind the Swedish strategy - and that the previous quotes have been interpreted.
- There has been news that I, or we at the authority, believe that the strategy was wrong and should be changed. We still believe that the strategy is good, you can always get better at this work, ”he says.
- I personally think it would be strange to answer that question differently.
Swedish Radio's reporter asks: Should it be understood that the strategy, given what you knew then, would look the same as it did?
- Yes, we make adjustments where we can based on the situation. Had we ended up in the same place with the same conditions and knowledge, we would have acted the same. Since then, we have always adapted to the period. We have not changed the strategy, but changed the business continuously, especially for something new that we had not experienced before, says Anders Tegnell, state epidemiologist at the Public Health Authority.
You don't disapprove of your own strategy?
- No not at all.
News agency TT's reporter asks: Did you take proper steps to make the development look more negative than you thought? Wouldn't it have been wise to apply the precautionary principle?
- The precautionary principle is a concept that one must deal with. Doing more can also do more harm. I think that when we evaluate this, it will not be easy to say exactly what factors have given success to some strategies but not all, Tegnell responds.
A reporter from the Financial Times asks how the state epidemiologist was personally affected by Sweden's corona strategy.
- Sometimes I feel like a punching bag, but I'm okay with it, says Anders Tegnell."