The reason for the female orgasm has long eluded scientists. Men need them for reproduction; women don't. So why do female orgasms exist?
Scientists studying this issue are divided, said David Puts, a biological anthropologist at Penn State University. Some scientists think female orgasms are totally purposeless. But evidence suggests that they may have once helped (and perhaps still help) us survive and reproduce.
One theory holds that women have orgasms because men have them, said Kimberly Russell, an ecologist at Rutgers University in New Jersey. Some researchers argue that female orgasms exist because as fetuses, we all start out with the same basic parts, regardless of sex. Orgasms in women, like nipples on men, just happen to stick around.
Related: What's an orgasm?
"It might be an anatomical bonus," she told Live Science. In this scenario, the orgasm didn't evolve specifically for females, and it might not serve a specific evolutionary function for them.
But there's a problem with the argument that orgasms have no function, said Patricia Brennan, an evolutionary biologist at Mount Holyoke College in Massachusetts. It's not adaptive for our bodies to devote too much energy to traits, like nipples, that aren't beneficial. These traits tend to disappear or become less pronounced over time. That's far from the case for female orgasms, she said. According to the Kinsey Institute, female orgasms tend to last longer than male orgasms and can occur multiple times in a row — something that's rare in men. In other words, female orgasms use a lot of energy for a trait that supposedly has no function, she said.
Plus, there's nothing diminished about the anatomical structures involved in the female orgasm, Brennan noted.
The clitoris, a highly sensitive part of the female genitals that has a key role in orgasms, is homologous to the penis. Like male and female nipples, they grow from the same anatomical structure. But contrary to popular belief, Brennan told Live Science, "a clitoris is not just a mini penis."
The human clitoris has “structures that are incredibly well developed,” Brennan said. "To me, that screams selection."
There are multiple theories about how, exactly, the female orgasm helped our ancestors pass on their genes. Although women don't need to have an orgasm to conceive, some research suggests that wasn't always the case. Many female mammals, including rabbits and cats, ovulate only when they mate. Based on an analysis of how traits have been passed down through the tree of life, one study published in the Journal of Experimental Zoology found that our female ancestors probably needed orgasms in order to reproduce.
But again, this theory doesn't explain why orgasms stuck around in women, Brennan said.
"If orgasms evolved for some adaptive reason, but they're no longer adaptive, they should have disappeared. And clearly they haven't gone away," Brennan said.
Some research suggests that orgasms still create the perfect conditions for conception — even if they're not necessary to ovulate. One study found that women who had orgasms close to when their male partner did actually "upsucked" more sperm into their bodies compared with women who had orgasms much earlier or later than their partner. Scientists have even tried to draw correlations between the number of orgasms a woman has and the number of children she has. But the evidence for these hypotheses is shaky and doesn't draw a direct causal link between orgasms and conception, Puts told Live Science.
Plus, these theories leave a major question unanswered, Russell said. What if the orgasm has nothing to do with reproduction? What if, instead, it evolved only for pleasure?
Sex doesn't have to feel good for reproduction to take place, Russell said. "We know this from looking at animals! Sex can be very uncomfortable and still gets done," she said. But culturally, the idea that sex might be for more than just babies is somewhat of a taboo topic, Russell said.
Sex that feels good for both males and females has an important social role, Russell said. It relieves stress and helps partners bond. Ancestral humans might have engaged in sex to create more cohesive groups, smoothing over conflict and cementing their social network. We see these behaviors in other primates, like bonobos, who might use sex to help dispel a fight over a tasty piece of fruit or even a clan rivalry, the BBC reports. It follows from this argument that evolutionarily, female orgasms might have acted as a kind of social glue.
That pleasure alone is enough to make a trait adaptive goes against popular conceptions of why sex, and orgasms, exist. But for Brennan, it makes perfect sense. "To experience pleasure — that seems evolutionarily like a good idea," she said.
Originally published on Live Science.
Sign up for the Live Science daily newsletter now
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
Isobel Whitcomb is a contributing writer for Live Science who covers the environment, animals and health. Her work has appeared in the New York Times, Fatherly, Atlas Obscura, Hakai Magazine and Scholastic's Science World Magazine. Isobel's roots are in science. She studied biology at Scripps College in Claremont, California, while working in two different labs and completing a fellowship at Crater Lake National Park. She completed her master's degree in journalism at NYU's Science, Health, and Environmental Reporting Program. She currently lives in Portland, Oregon.
The figure is probably higher now with the sexual revolution, etc. But I recall reading that in the previous century, only about 30% of woman had orgasms during partnered sex. Doesn't sound like a "survival" trait to me. Plus in some tribal societies, girls still have their clitorisis surgically removed at a young age. I have no idea what the answer is but I'm not a believer in the neo-Darwinian "selection" theory either....Reply
I think you are looking at the concept of orgasms in a somewhat limited scope of reasoning and the answer maybe simpler than you think. Of course men do not have to orgasm , or indeed all animals do not need to have the intense feelings associated with the act of procreation in order to reproduce, or simply said it could have been a more mundane task that yielded no pleasure or have even been a painful thing to do. But I believe the answer is that it aligns with the struggle for survival quite nicely...Being that it gives animals an incentive to mate and reproduce and a reward for doing so. Indeed without this small but simple pleasure life has given us....... What incentives would creatures have to endeavor and aspire to accomplish the task?Reply
That being said, the intense pleasure and reward for the simple act is an incentive and goal that is a definite lure to procreate. Which along with pheromones becomes a natural part of likely.... all forms of life in creating an evolutionary advantage in the struggle to survive and reproduce.
Leave it to a male researcher to downplay female orgasms. I think as a medical professional it somehow assists in fertilization. Personally I think some scientists are just plain jealous. After all, until we REALLY know, this little gem is magnificent in delivering what you can only call FABULOUS! An organ for pleasure! There you go girls, we have something boy's don't and it is a whole lot less messy!Reply
Life itself wouldn't exist if it weren't pleasurable. Why would molecules glom together in the primordial soup to form sentient beings if the predominant sensation is pain? Scientists search for a physical function for the female orgasm but maybe it's all about the pleasure itself and the subsequent bond one feels with one's partner. It seems pretty obvious that the primary function of the orgasm is enjoyment. Duh. Try it, you'll like it.Reply
Warning: Asking "Why do women have orgasms?" while in bed is a sure way to prevent orgasms.Reply
religion is used to control women and prevent them from fully experiencing their sexual powers. This is a more "recent" development compared to the millions of previous years when women probably experienced orgasms normallyWilliam Pennat said:The figure is probably higher now with the sexual revolution, etc. But I recall reading that in the previous century, only about 30% of woman had orgasms during partnered sex. Doesn't sound like a "survival" trait to me. Plus in some tribal societies, girls still have their clitorisis surgically removed at a young age. I have no idea what the answer is but I'm not a believer in the neo-Darwinian "selection" theory either....
Religion has made all women subservient and powerless. Yet there were many cultures that treated women with respect. The Vikings for example. I imagine with the advent of the major religions men began to realize how important women were and felt threatened by it, thus putting "us" in our places, below them. What a shame we did not get the respect we deserve. Nor do we today. Look at the multitude of sex crimes against women and girls. Revolting. It's all about POWER. You will notice the male genitalia was never amputated! Thank goodness we have something enjoyable and unique. Orgasm may have assisted in conception but it still remains attainable even after menopuse.Reply
What would make women want to have sex with men if we didn’t have orgasms? It’s sad that some men don’t think of a woman’s pleasure during sex. It’s not all about men’s pleasure. It’s sad that some people think women having orgasms is pointless because they feel men would just rape us regardless if we agree to sex or not. The language I hear completely takes women as equals to a man out of the equation as if we have no say over our bodies. They should be asking what would men do if women didn’t have orgasms? Can women have pleasure without having anything to do with men and babies? Let’s just say this if women didn’t have orgasms humans would be extinct. That’s the only way women have put up with majority of men otherwise we don’t need men especially the way men have treated women in general.Reply
knowledge said:Leave it to a male researcher to downplay female orgasms. I think as a medical professional it somehow assists in fertilization. Personally I think some scientists are just plain jealous. After all, until we REALLY know, this little gem is magnificent in delivering what you can only call FABULOUS! An organ for pleasure! There you go girls, we have something boy's don't and it is a whole lot less messy!
you sound like a typical toxic female who has a chip on her shoulder against men.
Man comes from clay and are a slave to till it. Women come from man's flesh, and are a slave to the pleasures of it.Reply