An outbreak of COVID-19 on a fishing boat has provided scientists with the first direct evidence that antibodies really do protect people from re-infection.
More than 100 of the 122 crew members aboard the vessel were infected; but three sailors who had antibodies to the new coronavirus in their blood prior to the voyage — indicating a past infection — did not catch the virus a second time. These antibodies targeted the "spike protein" on SARS-CoV-2 that the virus uses to invade human cells.
Although scientists had suspected that having antibodies, particularly so-called "neutralizing antibodies," against COVID-19 would confer protection, they didn't have studies in humans to back that up.
"This is the first time to show that having these antibodies is a correlative of protection in people," study senior author Dr. Alex Greninger, an assistant professor of laboratory medicine and pathology at the University of Washington School of Medicine, said in a video released by the university.
The findings could be good news for candidate COVID-19 vaccines, which are generally trying to get the immune system to produce neutralizing antibodies against the virus, the authors said.
The study was posted Aug. 14 date to the pre-print database medRxiv, and has not yet been published in a peer reviewed journal.
The study researchers examined samples taken from crew members before and after the voyage. Prior to the boat's departure from Seattle in May, all 122 members were tested for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, and none tested positive. But three members were found to have neutralizing antibodies, which block the virus from infecting cells.
The boat's COVID-19 testing didn't stop infections from breaking out during the trip, and the vessel returned after 18 days at sea. A second round of testing revealed that more than 85% of crew members were infected with COVID-19.
Overall, 103 of the 117 crew members without neutralizing antibodies at the boat's departure were infected during the trip, compared with zero of the three members with neutralizing antibodies.
"This virus has shown the ability to infect a lot of people on boats ever since the beginning of the pandemic," Greninger said. "In a way, we're sort of turning the tide on the ships here, we're using them to learn things about our ability to protect ourselves."
The authors acknowledge that their study was small, with just three people having antibodies prior to departure. But the results were statistically significant, meaning there's a low likelihood that they are due to chance.
"Just looking at the numbers, it becomes clear that it’s unlikely that all of these three people were protected by chance," Florian Krammer, an immunologist at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York, told The New York Times.
The study also cannot determine how long antibodies would provide protection, and studies over longer periods will be needed to examine this, Greninger said.
The study also doesn't explain how a little over a dozen crew members apparently escaped infection without having preexisting immunity. It's possible that these crew members had jobs or behaviors that reduced exposure, Greninger told The Seattle Times.
Originally published on Live Science.
Live Science newsletter
Stay up to date on the latest science news by signing up for our Essentials newsletter.
Rachael is a Live Science contributor, and was a former channel editor and senior writer for Live Science between 2010 and 2022. She has a master's degree in journalism from New York University's Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program. She also holds a B.S. in molecular biology and an M.S. in biology from the University of California, San Diego. Her work has appeared in Scienceline, The Washington Post and Scientific American.
My question is WHO infected everyone ?? Could it have been one of the three previous infected people ???Reply
tnlobo420 said:My question is WHO infected everyone ?? Could it have been one of the three previous infected people ???
It is certainly possible that they were infected by one or more of the three previously infected ones. It is also possible that others were very recently infected but did not have sufficient time to produce enough virus particles to register positive before sailing. It would take some time after infection for most people to test positive.
More to the point - they make a big deal out the impact of neutralizing antibodies on the ability of the three not to develop another infection. Considering how new the virus is and that it has had little time to mutate, many experts would be surprised if the three did catch the virus again. That is why they call them neutralizing antibodies. It is also commonly known as "immunity". So it comes as no surprise, really.
There are countless stories of people avoiding reinfection by viruses and bacteria due to previous exposure to them. This is why vaccines often work so well. But, considering all the surprises this virus has caused, it is good to see that it is not a super virus, and it is subject to neutralizing antibodies of a prior infection.