No, There Isn't Poop in Your Iced Coffee
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Delivered Daily
Daily Newsletter
Sign up for the latest discoveries, groundbreaking research and fascinating breakthroughs that impact you and the wider world direct to your inbox.
Once a week
Life's Little Mysteries
Feed your curiosity with an exclusive mystery every week, solved with science and delivered direct to your inbox before it's seen anywhere else.
Once a week
How It Works
Sign up to our free science & technology newsletter for your weekly fix of fascinating articles, quick quizzes, amazing images, and more
Delivered daily
Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
Once a month
Watch This Space
Sign up to our monthly entertainment newsletter to keep up with all our coverage of the latest sci-fi and space movies, tv shows, games and books.
Once a week
Night Sky This Week
Discover this week's must-see night sky events, moon phases, and stunning astrophotos. Sign up for our skywatching newsletter and explore the universe with us!
Join the club
Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.
How do you take your iced coffee? For some people in the United Kingdom, an investigative report from the BBC has sparked concerns that the drink may come with an unwanted add-in: a dash of fecal bacteria.
A small BBC investigation found that iced coffees from several coffee chains, including Starbucks, were contaminated with bacteria from a group with an icky-sounding name: fecal coliform.
In the investigation, undercover researchers (posing as customers) tested ice in iced coffees from 10 stores of each of three coffee chains: Starbucks, Caffe Nero and Costa Coffee. Three out of 10 ice samples from both Starbucks and Caffe Nero contained the bacteria, and seven out of 10 ice samples from Costa Coffee were contaminated with fecal coliform, the BBC reported today (June 28). [9 Disgusting Things the FDA Allows in Your Food]
The sample size was very small, and all three coffee chains told the BBC that they are looking into the problem.
But do the findings of this investigation mean there's actually poop in your iced coffee?
Simply put, no — these findings don't mean there are feces in your iced coffee, said Ben Chapman, a food safety specialist and an associate professor at North Carolina State University.
"Fecal coliform" is a large group of bacteria that, yes, can be found in feces. But these bacteria are also found in many other things in the environment, such as fruits and vegetables, Chapman told Live Science.
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
These bacteria are "indicators," Chapman said, meaning they indicate that something may be present that could make a person sick. But an indicator's presence doesn't signify that someone definitely will get sick, he added.
The test for fecal coliform was developed in 1904, according to a 2006 article from Microbe Magazine, a publication from the American Society for Microbiology. But since the test's inception, more specific tests have been developed to look for fecal contamination in foods.
Indeed, the fecal coliform test often leads to false positives, meaning it sometimes suggests that a food contains feces when it doesn't, according to Microbe Magazine. This is because many types of bacteria that fall into the fecal coliform group aren't necessarily found in feces. However, fecal coliform test results have been repeatedly misinterpreted by doctors, public health officials and media outlets, the article said.
A better question to ask is, are there specific germs in the drinks that cause illness?
Finding bacteria doesn't mean you've found a pathogen: "Bacteria is everywhere, and if you look for it, you're going to find it," Chapman said. But many of those bacteria are harmless, he added. Further testing — for example, looking specifically for bacteria such as E. coli — would provide more useful information.
Chapman also noted that he'd be more focused on what's going on in the coffee shops. For example, do employees wash their hands regularly and after handling potentially contaminated foods and products? Do they sanitize the equipment properly? These behaviors could be more indicative of the overall health risks the beverages and foods pose to consumers, he said.
In addition, it's unclear what type of testing the investigators used for the BBC report. Knowing these methods would provide more useful information, Chapman said. If investigators looked only for bacterial DNA, for example, you wouldn't know if the bacteria were alive or dead.
"We eat dead bacteria all the time," he added, referring to the fact that dead bacteria aren't going to make you sick.
Originally published on Live Science.

