Was the Deadly Washington Mudslide Preventable?
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Delivered Daily
Daily Newsletter
Sign up for the latest discoveries, groundbreaking research and fascinating breakthroughs that impact you and the wider world direct to your inbox.
Once a week
Life's Little Mysteries
Feed your curiosity with an exclusive mystery every week, solved with science and delivered direct to your inbox before it's seen anywhere else.
Once a week
How It Works
Sign up to our free science & technology newsletter for your weekly fix of fascinating articles, quick quizzes, amazing images, and more
Delivered daily
Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
Once a month
Watch This Space
Sign up to our monthly entertainment newsletter to keep up with all our coverage of the latest sci-fi and space movies, tv shows, games and books.
Once a week
Night Sky This Week
Discover this week's must-see night sky events, moon phases, and stunning astrophotos. Sign up for our skywatching newsletter and explore the universe with us!
Join the club
Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.
A deadly mudslide that killed at least 29 people when it engulfed the small town of Oso, Wash., in mud and rocks nearly two weeks ago could have been prevented, according to an expert on landslides. Dave Petley, a professor of hazard and risk in the department of geography at Durham University in the United Kingdom, expressed his thoughts in a new post on his blog, The Landslide Blog, which is hosted by the American Geophysical Union (AGU).
"To my mind this was [a] foreseeable event, and as such the disaster represents a failure of hazard management," Petley wrote.
The March 22 landslide occurred when an unstable, waterlogged hillside collapsed on the bank of the Stillaguamish River, which is located approximately 50 miles (80 kilometers) north of Seattle. Satellite images over time reveal the bluff's history of instability, including landslides and erosion within the region in 2001 and 2006, Petley wrote.
"The 2001 landslide left material high on the hillside that was sitting above a scar that was far too steep," he said. "The [remote sensing] data suggests that the runout from such a collapse could be extensive. In that context I find the decision to build new houses at the foot of the landslide to be very surprising."
Follow Denise Chow on Twitter @denisechow. Follow Live Science @livescience, Facebook & Google+.
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.

Denise Chow was the assistant managing editor at Live Science before moving to NBC News as a science reporter, where she focuses on general science and climate change. Before joining the Live Science team in 2013, she spent two years as a staff writer for Space.com, writing about rocket launches and covering NASA's final three space shuttle missions. A Canadian transplant, Denise has a bachelor's degree from the University of Toronto, and a master's degree in journalism from New York University.
