Skip to main content
In Brief

Prominent study showing harm from hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 patients is retracted

hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) tablets
(Image: © NARINDER NANU/AFP via Getty Images)

A study that suggested antimalarial drugs such as hydroxychloroquine were dangerous for those with COVID-19 has been retracted. The study was withdrawn over concerns about the study's data, which was provided by an obscure U.S. analytics company called Surgisphere.

In the study, which was originally published May 22 in the journal The Lancet, researchers reported that hydroxychloroquine and the related drug chloroquine were tied to an increased risk of death and heart problems among hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

However on Wednesday (June 3), the journal published an "expression of concern" about the study, saying that "serious scientific questions have been brought to our attention" about the research, and that the authors had commissioned an independent audit of the study. On Thursday (June 4), the journal announced three of the study's authors had retracted the paper, saying that they "were unable to complete an independent audit of the data underpinning their analysis," according to a statement published in the journal. "As a result, [the three authors] have concluded that they 'can no longer vouch for the veracity of the primary data sources,'" the statement said. The journal added that "there are many outstanding questions about Surgisphere and the data that were allegedly included in this study."

Surgisphere runs a database used in the study, and claims to have data from more than 1,000 hospitals worldwide, according to The Guardian. This database was also used in another prominent COVID-19 study published in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), which was also retracted on Thursday (June 4). That study suggested that taking certain blood pressure medication did not increase the risk of death in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. 

The CEO of Surgisphere, Dr. Sapan Desai, is an author on The Lancet paper and NEJM paper.

A close look at this database has turned up multiple red flags, including that the number of patients listed from each country doesn’t seem to add up, and that doses of the anti-malaria drugs reportedly used in certain countries appear farfetched, according to Science Magazine.

"It began to stretch and stretch and stretch credulity," Dr. Nicholas White, a malaria researcher at Mahidol University in Bangkok, told Science.

For example, the database included more COVID-19 deaths in Australia than had been reported in the whole country at the time, according to The Guardian. (The Lancet initially issued a small correction about this discrepancy, saying that one hospital that was categorized as Australian should have been included in the "Asia" group.)

What's more, when The Guardian reached out to seven Australian hospitals included in the database, none of them had heard of Surgisphere, and they denied any involvement in the database.

In addition, many of the doses reportedly given to patients in North America were higher than what's recommended by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Science reported.

There are also questions about Surgisphere itself, which was founded in 2008 as a medical education company, but only recently announced having its database, according to The Guardian. 

Desai told the Guardian that the company has 11 employees. Three of those employees were listed on the company's LinkedIn page as of Wednesday (June 3), The Guardian reported.

"Surgisphere came out of nowhere to conduct perhaps the most influential global study in this pandemic in the matter of a few weeks," physician and entrepreneur Dr. James Todaro, told The Guardian. "It doesn’t make sense … It would require many more researchers than it claims to have for this expedient and [size] of multinational study to be possible."

Desai told The Guardian that Surgisphere’s health-care data analytics services started around 2008 and have grown since then. He added that the company uses artificial intelligence and machine learning to automate processes as much as possible.

A statement on Surgisphere's website says that its database is "an aggregation of the deidentified electronic health records [EHRs] of customers of QuartzClinical, Surgisphere's machine-learning program and data analytics platform. Surgisphere directly integrates with the EHRs of our hospital customers. ... As part of these QuartzClinical customer agreements, Surgisphere … has permission to include these hospitals' EHR data in its queryable registry/database of real-world, real-time patient encounters."

After The Lancet study was published, the World Health Organization (WHO) paused work on a trial of hydroxychloroquine for treating COVID-19 due to safety concerns about the drug. But on Wednesday (June 3), the WHO announced that the trial would resume. However, the organization said that there is still no evidence that any drug, including hydroxychloroquine, reduces the risk of death from COVID-19, according to CNBC.

Originally published on Live Science.  

OFFER: Save 45% on 'How It Works' 'All About Space' and 'All About History'!

For a limited time, you can take out a digital subscription to any of our best-selling science magazines for just $2.38 per month, or 45% off the standard price for the first three months.View Deal

  • Hayseed
    Our science has become so political.........one would be a fool to believe any of it.

    Education does NOT result in critical thinking or intellect. It prevents it.
    Reply
  • adam
    Hayseed said:
    Our science has become so political.........one would be a fool to believe any of it.

    Education does NOT result in critical thinking or intellect. It prevents it.


    US Government CDC / NIH Covid-19
    Treatment Guideline Panel Members

    There appears to be a massive conflict of interest with Panel Members working for or advising Gilead

    This is the same panel that put a brake on Hydrochloroquine

    Watch the youtube video below from 7mins 50 secs for the financial conflict details also set out below

    NIH Covid-19 Treatment Guideline Panel Members

    9 members reported links to Gilead
    and
    7 more members
    (including 2 of the committes 3 leaders)
    had links to Gilead that were beyond the 11 months required for formal reporting and
    2 other members were on Gileads advisory panel

    other NIH Treatment Panel Members were paid consultants or received other financial benefits from Gilead

    View: zB-_SV-y11YView: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zB-_SV-y11Y

    No members were connected with any company that makes Hydroxychloroquine


    FRENCH Financial Conflicts

    Separately a French study shows the financial links French Drs approving the formal use of Hydroxychloroquine have to Gilead and the way they voted in favor or against using Hydroxychloroquine appears almost 100% correlated with the amount of money they recieved from Gilead

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2052297520300627

    Our results show a correlation (correlation coefficient = 1) between the amount received from the Gilead Sciences company and public opposition to the use of hydroxychloroquine in France. This should open up the debate on the role of the interest links of doctors with pharmaceutical companies in the medical and scientific public debate.


    PDF


    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2052297520300627/pdf?md5=11d14bf4478982b06d0f7b045f1d10a4&pid=1-s2.0-S2052297520300627-main.pdf
    Reply