Skip to main content

These lava tubes could be the safest place for explorers to live on Mars

Curiosity Rover Self-Portrait at Drill Site
Curiosity can handle the harsh radiation on the Martian surface. But people can't.
(Image: © NASA/JPL/MSSS/Marco Di Lorenzo/Ken Kremer)

There's no safe place to camp out on Mars. But a team of researchers has identified what could be future Martian explorers' best possible hideout: a string of lava tubes in the low-lying Hellas Planitia — an impact basin blasted into the Red Planet's surface by ancient meteor impacts.

Every part of Mars could kill you. Its surface is arid, starved of oxygen and blasted daily with unrelenting, unfiltered solar radiation. Any future Martian explorers will put their lives in peril when they embark. NASA has decades of experience hauling oxygen, food and water beyond Earth. But that last killer, the radiation, is a harder problem to tackle.

On Earth, a powerful magnetic shield, known as the magnetosphere, protects us from the harsh radiation of space. Without it, a constant stream of electromagnetic rays would damage our cells and DNA, with dire consequences to our health. Ionized particles, streaming through space as slower-moving solar wind or relativistic cosmic rays add to that risk. And we know from the experiences of the only humans to exit the magnetosphere — Apollo astronauts — that even a few days' exposure to those particles can trigger headaches, flashes of light and cataracts, the researchers of the new study noted in their new paper. Plus, there's always the risk that a solar flare or cosmic ray burst could expose a Martian habitat to a sudden, deadly dose.

Related: Here's what NASA's Opportunity rover saw before 'lights out'

There's only so much shielding you can put on a spacecraft or habitat, and even astronauts on the International Space Station accept much higher cancer risk than they would experience on Earth, NASA has said. But in the new paper, that team of researchers argues that the Hellas Planitia lava tubes might be among the safest places for Martian explorers to camp out.

Hellas Planitia offers a few protective advantages on its own: NASA probes have shown that the most intense radiation environments on Mars are at the poles. But Hellas Planitia lies closer to the equator. And of all Martian environments, the impact basin is among the most low-lying at about 23,464 feet (7,152 meters) deep. That means more of Mars' thin atmosphere overhead. About 50% less radiation reaches the basin floor than higher-elevation regions of Mars, the researchers wrote. Explorers could expect about 342 microsieverts per day (a unit of radiation exposure) in the basin, compared with 547 μSv/day elsewhere on Mars. That's a much smaller dose, but still much higher than what's typically considered safe.

The precise effects of long-term exposure to sub-fatal doses of radiation like this aren't well understood, as Richard Kerr wrote for the news section of the journal Science in 2013. But 342 μSv/day is 25% higher than what the average astronauts experience on the ISS every day, where NASA typically limits exposures to just a couple months. Martian explorers might spend years on the Red Planet. And exposure to such a high dose for years on end could pose a serious danger to everyone involved, the researchers said. (The maximum safe radiation dose, according to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission is 620 millirem, or 6,200 μSv, per year. At 342 μSv/day, Martian explorers would experience that much radiation in just 19 days.)

In the northeast corner of Hellas Planitia lies the Hadriacus Mons. This mountain formed as a result of an erupting volcano back when lava still flowed in the long-since-cooled Martian interior.

On Earth, lava flows can burrow through the ground on their way to the surface, leaving behind empty tunnels with hardened walls, floors and ceilings once the molten rock drains away. You can spot signs of them flying overhead: A line of "pit craters" near a dormant volcano tells the story of a lava tube that formed, drained and then partially collapsed in one section or another — sometimes even leaving behind "skylight" holes in the middle of the crater, the researchers wrote.

Hunting through images taken from probes in Mars' orbit, the researchers identified several such pit crater chains and other evidence of old lava flows that burrowed into the Martian crust around Hadriacus Mons. Multiple sites around that low-lying mountain seem like tempting candidates for future exploration, they wrote. And on Mars, with its lower gravity, simulations suggest that the hollowed-out tubes would be much larger than those found on Earth.

An image shows aerial views of a pit crater chain hiding a lava tube in New Mexico (top) and a similar formation on Mars (bottom).

An image shows aerial views of a pit crater chain hiding a lava tube in New Mexico (top) and a similar formation on Mars (bottom). (Image credit: Paris et al./arXiv)

Assuming these clues point to the existence of real lava tubes in Hellas Planitia, the researchers visited similar sites in the American Southwest to test the idea of lava tubes as radiation shields. Though cosmic radiation on Earth's surface is much lower than on Mars, some of those particles do make it to our planet's surface. Comparing measurements of radiation inside and outside California's Mojave Aiken tube, Arizona's Lava River Cave, and New Mexico's Big Skylight, Giant Ice Cave and Junction Cave, the researchers found a significant radiation-shielding effect. Extrapolating their results to Mars, they calculated that living in a Hellas lava tube, people might experience just about 61.64 μSv/day. That's still high, but closer to what you could expect if you got your teeth X-rayed several times a day than what you could expect living in a habitat on the surface of Mars.

There are other potential advantages to life in the tubes, the researchers wrote. Shore them up, seal them off, and it might be possible to pressurize them and warm them up to create livable environments much larger than what a rocket could haul from Earth. Like human-made shelters, the tubes would also offer protection from micrometeorites, temperature fluctuations and potentially dangerous substances in the Martian surface dust.

And these explorers could learn more about the Red Planet. "The candidate lava tubes, moreover, can serve as important locations for direct observation and study of Martian geology and geomorphology," the researchers concluded, "as well as potentially uncovering any evidence for the development of microbial life early in the natural history of Mars."

The paper has been accepted for publication in The Journal of The Washington Academy of Sciences and can be read on arXiv.

Originally published on Live Science.

OFFER: Save 45% on 'How It Works' 'All About Space' and 'All About History'!

For a limited time, you can take out a digital subscription to any of our best-selling science magazines for just $2.38 per month, or 45% off the standard price for the first three months.View Deal

  • Aaron C
    Just as a few calculation issues. If 6200 μSv is the yearly recommended dose and astronauts in the Hellas basin are believed to get around 342 μSv/day then it would exceed that in 18.13 days, not 19, and it's not clear if Earth days or Martian sols are being used. Since the Martian day is 37 minutes longer than an Earth day, this would mean that would happen in about 17.7 martian days. More importantly, if the dosages were reduced to 61.64 μSv/day in the lava tubes then this would mean a maximum stay time of 101.6 Earth days or 98 Mars days, and that would only be if one never left the tubes to do anything outside. So it would not really be possible, with this alone, for astronauts to safely stay there for years, as the article discusses.
    Reply
  • Broadlands
    At the risk of being too 'tongue-in-cheek' facetious, if you go, don't forget to take toilet paper and a garbage disposer along with your oxygen generator. The carbon cycle won't be working. TV and cell phone reception might not be very good to call home:)
    Reply
  • LMH
    Two thoughts:
    1.) Floors of the lava tubes might be a source of ice as well as a ground-shielded habitat location. Reason -- On exploring a lava tube at Craters Of The Moon Nat'l Mon. in central Idaho, I recall being surprised to find ice in the floor cracks, even though it was a very hot day in the middle of summer! Granted, Idaho is not Mars, but it was only 25-30 feet below the ground's surface and apparently permanently shaded.
    2.) Any chance that lead ore deposits (Pb) have been or could be detected from orbit, or by the Martian rovers? Reason -- Some ground-up lead ore included on the outside (solar exposed sides) of building bricks could go a long ways in reducing the daily radiation exposure of individuals working in dirt-sheltered brick-type structures. I remember the heavy use of even leaded glass in radiation protection at the Idaho Nat'l Lab on a school field trip 50 years ago. Even a small indigenous lead ore deposit could be much more valuable than gold or diamonds for long term habitation of a Mars colony.
    Reply
  • khuber
    I wasn't very happy crawling through lava tubes in Southern Oregon some years ago. Felt very confining. Maybe we ought to send mole rats first.
    Reply
  • Aaron C
    LMH said:
    Two thoughts:
    1.) Floors of the lava tubes might be a source of ice as well as a ground-shielded habitat location. Reason -- On exploring a lava tube at Craters Of The Moon Nat'l Mon. in central Idaho, I recall being surprised to find ice in the floor cracks, even though it was a very hot day in the middle of summer! Granted, Idaho is not Mars, but it was only 25-30 feet below the ground's surface and apparently permanently shaded.
    2.) Any chance that lead ore deposits (Pb) have been or could be detected from orbit, or by the Martian rovers? Reason -- Some ground-up lead ore included on the outside (solar exposed sides) of building bricks could go a long ways in reducing the daily radiation exposure of individuals working in dirt-sheltered brick-type structures. I remember the heavy use of even leaded glass in radiation protection at the Idaho Nat'l Lab on a school field trip 50 years ago. Even a small indigenous lead ore deposit could be much more valuable than gold or diamonds for long term habitation of a Mars colony.

    I like the fact that you are thinking about this. I suspect that it would be easier to use a bulldozer and push a big pile of rocks and rubble over the ground that is above the inhabited part of the lava tube. A dirt berm probably wouldn't cut it, since mars can have some pretty intense winds, but a tarp and rocks can solve that problem, I suppose.

    I too have explored lava tubes, like the Big Skylight Cave in New Mexico. You are right that things can be colder there, though remember that Mars is already considerably colder than freezing, even at the equator, at most times of year.

    We could do something like they are proposing on the Moon where we land a prefabbed module inside a crater and then push a lot of dirt and rubble on top of it.

    But in the scheme of things it will still be far easier and more economical to build bases on the Moon than Mars in the foreseeable future. There is clearly ice there too, and we have done so little exploration on the lunar surface.
    Reply
  • Aaron C
    khuber said:
    I wasn't very happy crawling through lava tubes in Southern Oregon some years ago. Felt very confining. Maybe we ought to send mole rats first.
    the article noted that it is probable that these tubes will be bigger, given the lower gravity.
    Reply
  • LMH
    Hmmm.... Besides people, lots of other things are also sensitive to radiation. Unprotected polymers (plastic pipes, conduits, wiring insulation, pneumatic tires, door seals) initially brokedown rather quickly under UV radiation on Earth: that's why tires and electric cords are protected with carbon black and other opaque pigments on Earth. With Mars' thin atmosphere, I suspect the UV exposure is significantly worse even though Mars is further from the Sun than the Earth is. I wonder if a LOT more pigment or even mineral shielding on wires, plastic pipes, door seals, etc. will be needed on Mars? Plastic windows would be attacked as well -- wonder if something like "leaded clear acrylic" can be made for large windows, rather than the much heavier leaded glass? What are windows on current spacecraft made from, anybody know?

    Sounds like we'd better send a DitchWitch for making trenches with the first long-term visitors! (Though, the perchlorates in the Mars soil may be a chemical attack/corrosion hazard too??) One supposes small pump houses and electric/solar panel control stations will have to be sheltered from radiation with stone or bricks to protect the wiring's insulation, circuit boards, electrical equipment, and the workers maintaining them during the day. Perhaps a lot of the human surface work could be done at night, simply to avoid the harsher daytime radiation? Having heavier "grunt" surface work done during the day by radio-controlled drone rovers might help avoid humans' radiation overexposure.

    Perhaps carbon fibers incorporated in structures and insulation could 'kill two birds with one stone'? That is, provide lightweight structural strength and radiation resistance, since (at least the cheaper pitch-based) carbon fibers are very black like the carbon black used for tire/electric cord's UV blockers. Musings. . . .
    Reply