Pi calculated to 105 trillion digits, smashing world record

The number pi written out on a blackboard
Pi has an infinite number of non-repeating decimal places. (Image credit: Shutterstock)

A data storage company has decoded more than 100 trillion digits of pi — smashing the world record for calculating the never-ending number. Unraveling this hefty slice of pi required the equivalent computing power of hundreds of thousands of smartphones.   

Pi — often abbreviated as 3.14 — is an irrational number, meaning it has infinite nonrepeating decimal places. The value of pi is equal to the circumference of a circle (the distance around its edge) divided by its diameter (the distance between two directly opposite points). It means you can figure out the circumference of any circle if you know its diameter or radius (half the diameter) or vice versa because we know the value of pi.

Unraveling the hidden decimal places of pi has no real impact on mathematics because calculations rarely require more than a few dozen digits. For example, NASA scientists only need to know the first 15 decimal places of pi to understand most of the universe. Instead, calculating the number to its most exact value has long been used as a benchmark for testing new computer programs and data storage systems.

On Pi Day (March 14), Solidigm — a U.S. computer storage company based in California — revealed in a statement that it has calculated pi to approximately 105 trillion decimal places. 

To put that into context, if you typed out this number on paper using a 10-point font in one continuous line, the number would be around 2.3 billion miles (3.7 billion kilometers) long, meaning it could stretch from Earth to somewhere between Uranus and Neptune. And in case you were wondering, the 105 trillionth digit of pi is 6.

Related: 12 numbers that are cooler than pi

NASA scientists need only the first 16 digits of pi in most of their calculations. (Image credit: NASA Ames/JPL-Caltech/T. Pyle, Christine Daniloff, MIT)

The calculation, which took around 75 days to complete, was carried out with 36 of the company's proprietary solid-state drives (SSDs) — a storage medium fitted into many of the newest laptops — that stored altogether around 1 petabyte (1 million gigabytes) of data. 

Processors are also needed to perform the number-crunching — with more powerful components reducing the time it takes to perform the necessary calculations. However, reliable and large-capacity storage is arguably more important because you need to store a massive amount of data in such a process.  

The achievement "was no small feat," Solidigm owner Brian Beeler said in the statement. "It involved meticulous planning, optimization, and execution."

In April 2023, Solidigm matched the record of 100 trillion digits of pi, which was calculated by Google Cloud in 2022.

Before that, the record was 62.8 trillion digits, which were calculated over 108 days by a supercomputer at the University of Applied Sciences of the Grisons in Switzerland in 2021. Going back even further, the record was set at 50 trillion digits in 2020 by Timothy Mullican of Huntsville, Alabama, using his personal computer. 

Using the human computer (the brain), the current world record for the most digits of pi memorized by a person is 70,000, which was achieved by Rajveer Meena at the VIT University in India, on March 21, 2015, according to Guinness World Records.

As computers continue to get more powerful in the future, we will inevitably start to uncover larger and larger slices of pi. However, no matter how powerful computers get, we will never be able to unravel the entire number due to its infinite nature. 

Harry Baker
Senior Staff Writer

Harry is a U.K.-based senior staff writer at Live Science. He studied marine biology at the University of Exeter before training to become a journalist. He covers a wide range of topics including space exploration, planetary science, space weather, climate change, animal behavior, evolution and paleontology. His feature on the upcoming solar maximum was shortlisted in the "top scoop" category at the National Council for the Training of Journalists (NCTJ) Awards for Excellence in 2023. 

  • Bruzote
    What is the value in doing this, given the use of energy and other resources? Couldn't the same computational effort be used to solve problems like protein folding or checking mathematical proofs?
  • MobileJAD
    Bruzote said:
    What is the value in doing this, given the use of energy and other resources? Couldn't the same computational effort be used to solve problems like protein folding or checking mathematical proofs?
    The value exists because there's a company who designs storage components for computers that needs name recognition. By having an established benchmark that people recognize as a standard for evaluating performance, the company can use that benchmark to impress people and establish that name recognition. And calculating all of that Pi got them in the news and people talking about them, which is where you want your companies name.
    But I agree that with all of the energy spent calculating Pi would have been better put into folding protein instead, but people who are interested in reading about the performance of new computer hardware know more about calculating Pi than about protein folding, which is sad, as protein folding has real world impact.
  • kenorcutt
    Bruzote said:
    What is the value in doing this, given the use of energy and other resources? Couldn't the same computational effort be used to solve problems like protein folding or checking mathematical proofs?
    Considering the answer is wrong. There is absolutely no value in this.

    Pi is 3.144...

    The error has been known for years. But the status quo guards who have built their life around the error can't let go of it.
  • Brogan
    I'm very displeased with knowing the chalk writing of Pi at the top of the article is wrong and even contains a repeat segment. Its right for a couple lines then turns into random numbers not associated with that location in Pi. I only know because I can personally type out 80 decimal places of Pi from memory in just a few seconds.
  • NerillDP
    Although reading about records in calculating pi is marginally interesting, what I would find more compelling is someone actually looking for patterns in pi, like in the Carl Sagan story, Contact.