Physicists set a new record by linking together a hot soup of 15 trillion atoms in a bizarre phenomenon called quantum entanglement. The finding could be a major breakthrough for creating more accurate sensors to detect ripples in space-time called gravitational waves or even the elusive dark matter thought to pervade the universe.
Entanglement, a quantum phenomena Albert Einstein famously described as "spooky action at a distance," is a process in which two or more particles become linked and any action performed on one instantaneously affects the others regardless of how far apart they are. Entanglement lies at the heart of many emerging technologies, such as quantum computing and cryptography.
Entangled states are infamous for being fragile; their quantum links can be easily broken by the slightest internal vibration or interference from the outside world. For this reason, scientists attempt to reach the coldest temperatures possible in experiments to entangle jittery atoms; the lower the temperature, the less likely atoms are to bounce into each other and break their coherence. For the new study, researchers at the Institute of Photonic Science (ICFO) in Barcelona, Spain, took the opposite approach, heating atoms to millions of times hotter than a typical quantum experiment to see if entanglement could persist in a hot and chaotic environment.
"Entanglement is one of the most remarkable quantum technologies, but it is famously fragile," said Jia Kong, a visiting scientist at ICFO and lead author of the study. "Most entanglement-related quantum technology has to be applied in a low-temperature environment, such as a cold atomic system. This limits the application of entanglement states. [Whether or not] entanglement can survive in a hot and messy environment is an interesting question."
Things get hot and messy
The researchers heated a small glass tube filled with vaporized rubidium and inert nitrogen gas to 350 degrees Fahrenheit (177 degrees Celsius), coincidentally the perfect temperature to bake cookies. At this temperature, the hot cloud of rubidium atoms is in a state of chaos, with thousands of atomic collisions taking place every second. Like billiard balls, the atoms bounce off each other, transferring their energy and spin. But unlike classical billiards, this spin does not represent the physical motion of the atoms.
In quantum mechanics, spin is a fundamental property of particles, just like mass or electric charge, that gives particles an intrinsic angular momentum. In many ways, the spin of a particle is analogous to a spinning planet, having both angular momentum and creating a weak magnetic field, called a magnetic moment. But in the wacky world of quantum mechanics, classical analogies fall apart. The very notion that particles like protons or electrons are rotating solid objects of size and shape doesn't fit the quantum worldview. And when scientists try to measure a particle's spin, they get one of two answers: up or down. There are no in-betweens in quantum mechanics.
Fortunately, the tiny magnetic fields created by a particle's spin allow scientists to measure spin in a number of unique ways. One of those involves polarized light, or electromagnetic waves that oscillate in a single direction.
The researchers shot a beam of polarized light at the tube of rubidium atoms. Because the atoms' spins act like tiny magnets, the polarization of the light rotates as it passes through the gas and interacts with its magnetic field. This light-atom interaction creates large-scale entanglement between the atoms and the gas. When researchers measure the rotation of the light waves that come out the other side of the glass tube, they can determine the total spin of the gas of atoms, which consequently transfers the entanglement onto the atoms and leaves them in an entangled state.
"The [measurement] we used is based on light-atom interaction," Kong said. "With proper conditions, the interaction will produce correlation between light and atoms, and then if we do correct detection, the correlation will be transferred into atoms, therefore creating entanglement between atoms. The surprising thing is that these random collisions didn't destroy entanglement."
In fact, the "hot and messy" environment inside the glass tube was key to the experiment's success. The atoms were in what physicists call a macroscopic spin singlet state, a collection of pairs of entangled particles' total spin sums to zero. The initially entangled atoms pass their entanglement to each other via collisions in a game of quantum tag, exchanging their spins but keeping the total spin at zero, and allowing the collective entanglement state to persist for at least a millisecond. For instance, particle A is entangled with particle B, but when particle B hits particle C, it links both particles with particle C, and so on.
This "means that 1,000 times per second, a new batch of 15 trillion atoms is being entangled," Kong said in a statement. One millisecond "is a very long time for the atoms, long enough for about 50 random collisions to occur. This clearly shows that the entanglement is not destroyed by these random events. This is maybe the most surprising result of the work."
Because the scientists are only able to understand the collective state of the entangled atoms, the application of their research is limited to special uses. Technologies like quantum computers are likely out of the question, since the state of individually entangled particles needs to be known to store and send information.
However, their results may help to develop ultra-sensitive magnetic field detectors, capable of measuring magnetic fields more than 10 billion times weaker than Earth's magnetic field. Such powerful magnetometers have applications in many fields of science. For example, in the study of neuroscience, magnetoencephalography is used to take images of the brain by detecting the ultra-faint magnetic signals given off by brain activity.
"We hope that this kind of giant entangled state will lead to better sensor performance in applications ranging from brain imaging, to self-driving cars, to searches for dark matter," Morgan Mitchell, a professor of physics and the lab's group leader, said in the statement.
Their results were published online May 15 in the journal Nature Communications.
- The 18 biggest unsolved mysteries in physics
- The 11 biggest unanswered questions about dark matter
- The 15 weirdest galaxies in our universe
Originally published on Live Science.
For a limited time, you can take out a digital subscription to any of our best-selling science magazines for just $2.38 per month, or 45% off the standard price for the first three months.
Live Science newsletter
Stay up to date on the latest science news by signing up for our Essentials newsletter.
Can anyone explain why this isn't an article about conservation of total spin of all the particles in the container? Isn't that a better way to explain it as opposed to quantum entanglement?Reply
"The very notion that particles like protons or electrons are rotating solid objects of size and shape doesn't fit the quantum worldview. And when scientists try to measure a particle's spin, they get one of two answers: up or down. There are no in-betweens in quantum mechanics."Reply
True as far as it goes, but atoms are more complex systems. An atomic electron wavefunction - orbital - has a shape related to its orbital angular momentum https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azimuthal_quantum_number ]. But of course the electron itself is point like as a particle.
Can anyone explain why this isn't an article about conservation of total spin of all the particles in the container? Isn't that a better way to explain it as opposed to quantum entanglement?
I think the article author labored more to explain entanglement, which is what the experiment observes, than to explain the total entangled spin of the singlet states, which is what the experiment measures. They use the strength of the applied magnetic field to see the entanglement:
"Fig. 3 Evidence for long-range entanglement. Points show the KF-obtained variances (ΔF^2_z) of the rotating-frame spin component F_z as a function of delay since Fz was last aligned along the laboratory z axis, and thus subject to measurement by Faraday rotation. ... As seen in these data, increased gradient B0 causes a faster relaxation toward the thermal spin state (TSS) value, as is expected for a gas of singlets ..."
It seems they have performed a kind of a Bell measurement similar to what is done in the quantum teleportation protocol. There too, performing a (Bell) measurement entangles somethings and detangles previously entangled parts.Reply
Some explanations in this article (especially the included "Paul Explains" clip) encounter a pitfall which often plagues attempts to explain quantum phenomena: that of using classical terms to describe them. This creates an image of quantum physics of something like "weird classical physics", instead of a whole different realm.Reply
For example, IMHO it's wrong to present uncertainty as "we don't know (or even, cannot know) an electron's exact position" -- this implies that there is such a thing; instead, it's important to stress that the very term "exact position" is meaningless. (Admittedly, even the term "uncertainty" itself is inadequate in this regard).
A rotating helix of current can explain all measured properties. And with a variable pi structure, evade mathematical measurement analysis.Reply
I hope that they have performed a Bell test. If they have, I wish they would publish the results as I think that a Bell test which did not use particle-antiparticle pairs would not break/exceed the Bell inequalities. I assume that their Bell test would use particle-particle pairs and it would be very useful to show whether the Bell experiment works in the same way using electron-electron pairs rather than using electron-positron pairs..Constantine2020 said:It seems they have performed a kind of a Bell measurement similar to what is done in the quantum teleportation protocol. There too, performing a (Bell) measurement entangles somethings and detangles previously entangled parts.
I apologize for reviving an old thread, but I just came across his article and noticed the posts landed in that incredibly rare overlap between "informed poster" and "vernacular and terminology is accessible to me".Reply
Is someone able to explain to me why the following example from the article is true:
For instance, particle A is entangled with particle B, but when particle B hits particle C, it links both particles with particle C, and so on.
And not: "when particle B collides with particle C, entanglement between particle B and A is broken"?
I think the article is misusing the term entanglement. I would call this a magnetic alignment. Using a light field. A volume of aligned particles/ions would indeed make a sensitive detector for all sorts of stimuli. And the change of it. The little and quick change in stimuli.Reply
And the true mystery of entanglement as it is normally defined, might be solved, by trying to entangle, in the absence of a gravity field. They keep saying that there is no physical connection between entangled particles/ions. What about gravity? The particles are entangled under the same gravity field. Could gravity be the fulcrum for this?