Boiling tap water can remove nearly 90% of microplastics, new study finds

a pot of boiling water shown on a stove top ring
Boiling water for a few minutes can reduce the number of microplastics in it, a study finds. (Image credit: Shutterstock)

Boiling tap water before drinking it can remove at least 90% of potentially harmful microplastics, a new study has found.

Microplastics are tiny pieces of plastic debris measuring less than 0.2 inches (5 millimeters) long, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). These broken-down remnants of industrial waste and consumer goods are impossible to avoid: they are found across the ocean and atmosphere, inside bottled water and even in human poop.

Studies into how microplastics impact human health are still scant and inconclusive, according to the World Health Organization. So far, some plastics are thought to be harmless, whereas others, such as polystyrene, have been shown to kill human cells, cause bowel inflammation and reduce fertility in mice.

In a new study, published Feb. 28 in the journal Environmental Science and Technology Letters, scientists looked into practical home methods to remove the tiny plastics from drinking water. One question they were particularly concerned with was whether boiling water could rid it of microplastic contamination.

"Drinking boiled water, an ancient tradition in some Asian countries, is supposedly beneficial for human health, as boiling can remove some chemicals and most biological substances," the researchers wrote in the new study. "However, it remains unclear whether boiling is effective in removing NMPs [nano/microplastics] in tap water."

Related: Humans inhale a credit card's worth of microplastics every week. Here's where it ends up.

To investigate, the researchers created samples of tap water containing many of the commonly occurring minerals alongside three commonly occuring microplastic compounds: polystyrene, polyethylene, and polypropylene. The researchers also varied the "hardness" of the water samples by adjusting the concentrations of calcium carbonate. (A vast majority of American homes use hard water, meaning the water has a high mineral content.)

After boiling the samples for 5 minutes and leaving them to cool, the researchers noted a drastic decline in the amount of microplastics. In harder water, there was a nearly 90% reduction in microplastics, because the calcium carbonate in the water became solid at higher temperatures, trapping the plastic particles within.

The researchers say that using this method alongside a simple coffee filter to remove the solidified calcium could be an easy way to remove the potentially health-damaging particles.

The effectiveness of point-of-use filters on their own is unclear due to insufficient research, although one study suggested that microfiltration filters could be usedto snag and remove stray particles.

Ben Turner
Staff Writer

Ben Turner is a U.K. based staff writer at Live Science. He covers physics and astronomy, among other topics like tech and climate change. He graduated from University College London with a degree in particle physics before training as a journalist. When he's not writing, Ben enjoys reading literature, playing the guitar and embarrassing himself with chess.

  • Darktangent
    © 2024 American Chemical Society
    Reply
  • Rootshot
    admin said:
    Tiny plastic particles float inside tap water, and it's still unclear how they impact our health. But boiling the water for 5 minutes could remove most of these microplastics, a new study finds.

    Boiling tap water can remove nearly 90 percent of microplastics, new study finds : Read more
    This makes no sense. Boiling plastic cannot transform it into water. If there is an absence of plastic in the boiled samples it implies that the plastic has broken down into its constituent components. These components could be more harmful than the plastic particles.
    Reply
  • cicchis0
    Rootshot said:
    This makes no sense. Boiling plastic cannot transform it into water. If there is an absence of plastic in the boiled samples it implies that the plastic has broken down into its constituent components. These components could be more harmful than the plastic particles.
    Their explanation for hard water boils down to (pun intended) the plastic particles serving as nucleation sites for calcium carbonate (lime scale) precipitation when the water cools, although they don't present it quite so scientifically and they somewhat gloss over the fact that this doesn't remove them, it just makes them easier to filter out. I suppose that depending on the vessel material and how it is cooled, these precipitates could form on the vessel wall, effectively removing them from suspension. They don't present it, but I suppose a similar process, i.e., the particles adhering to the vessel wall on cooling, through one mechanism or another, might explain a reduction in suspended plastics in boiled and cooled soft water, but whether that is a practical ongoing removal method or not is another matter.
    Reply
  • Rootshot
    cicchis0 said:
    Their explanation for hard water boils down to (pun intended) the plastic particles serving as nucleation sites for calcium carbonate (lime scale) precipitation when the water cools, although they don't present it quite so scientifically and they somewhat gloss over the fact that this doesn't remove them, it just makes them easier to filter out. I suppose that depending on the vessel material and how it is cooled, these precipitates could form on the vessel wall, effectively removing them from suspension. They don't present it, but I suppose a similar process, i.e., the particles adhering to the vessel wall on cooling, through one mechanism or another, might explain a reduction in suspended plastics in boiled and cooled soft water, but whether that is a practical ongoing removal method or not is another matter.
    Thank you for this excellent explanation.
    Reply
  • Norm_Shea
    Rootshot said:
    This makes no sense. Boiling plastic cannot transform it into water. If there is an absence of plastic in the boiled samples it implies that the plastic has broken down into its constituent components. These components could be more harmful than the plastic particles.
    Or it was volatilized and you're inhaling the components, which doesn't seem ideal either.

    Filtering seems like a more effective method because of the utility of not having to boil water for 5 minutes every time before using it. And if you're doing it in bulk before hand, you're probably going to then store it in a plastic container.
    Reply
  • Isurus
    The first question you need to ask is, who funded this study?
    This is blatant astroturfing. A "study" funded by oil/chemical companies to convince people that plastic in our water isn't that bad!
    Reply
  • bolide
    cicchis0 said:
    Their explanation for hard water boils down to (pun intended) the plastic particles serving as nucleation sites for calcium carbonate (lime scale) precipitation when the water cools, although they don't present it quite so scientifically and they somewhat gloss over the fact that this doesn't remove them, it just makes them easier to filter out. I suppose that depending on the vessel material and how it is cooled, these precipitates could form on the vessel wall, effectively removing them from suspension. They don't present it, but I suppose a similar process, i.e., the particles adhering to the vessel wall on cooling, through one mechanism or another, might explain a reduction in suspended plastics in boiled and cooled soft water, but whether that is a practical ongoing removal method or not is another matter.
    The study did say that the particles and the CaCO₃ formed an "incrustation," or in plain English, they deposited on the vessel walls.
    Reply
  • Steve.Nordquist
    Norm_Shea said:
    Or it was volatilized and you're inhaling the components, which doesn't seem ideal either.

    Filtering seems like a more effective method because of the utility of not having to boil water for 5 minutes every time before using it. And if you're doing it in bulk before hand, you're probably going to then store it in a plastic container.
    Or rather if you put a heat exchanger on your house's e.g. city water inlet, you can have a few meters of large glass^wcopper where the water's boiled, then more where it's cooled and you nerf the sedimentation and such in that loop and storage, so then you get to process the nanoplastics-in-carbonate waste when mucking out that tank (mind the glass.)

    Great props for the water loops behind solar use-case (in what passes for warm days) that at least brings some cope to the idea of hundreds of yards of water pipe and panel, their interior surfaces (superoleophobic transit for my true friends, heat transfer transit for my hot friends,) and the particles they may part with.

    Ah p-Spring, when a young fam organization's fancy turns to water dungeon services.
    Reply
  • Steve.Nordquist
    bolide said:
    The study did say that the particles and the CaCO₃ formed an "incrustation," or in plain English, they deposited on the vessel walls.
    It's like, gosh I hope nothing ingests the new product through an acidic digestive system. No problems here since I changed to an all-caustic enteroimmune core. (Yes a little sarcasm.) Once you get the first rejection from MDPI J. Look Don't Overthink It things get easier.
    Reply