The likely Leonardo da Vinci painting "Salvator Mundi" looks straightforward at first glance: a depiction of Jesus Christ in Renaissance-era clothing, raising one hand in blessing and holding a clear orb in the other.
But that orb defies the laws of optics, creating a controversy over just what da Vinci was using as his inspiration. Now, a new study argues that the orb may be a realistic depiction of a hollow glass ball.
The work has not yet been published in a peer-reviewed journal, but a preprint of the findings is posted on the preprint site arXiv. University of California, Irvine, researchers used a computer-rendering technique to show that the appearance of the orb would have been physically possible in the real world, if the orb were made of thin blown glass.
Related: Leonardo Da Vinci's 10 Best Ideas
But the paper is unlikely to settle the long-running debate over da Vinci’s intentions.
"The paper of the sphere is just one of many examples of scientists making ill-judged interventions in Leonardo studies based on ignorance of the sources," da Vinci scholar Martin Kemp, an emeritus professor of the history of art at the University of Oxford's Trinity College, wrote in an email to Live Science.
$450 million mystery
The "Salvator Mundi" is a painting with a dramatic past. It probably dates to around 1500 and was acquired by Charles I of England at some point in the 1600s. Charles I was executed in 1659 after a civil war, and in 1651 a mason named John Stone purchased the painting. In 1660, he returned the artwork to Charles II, the son of Charles I who retook the throne that year. The trail of the painting then goes cold until 1900, when it was resold not as an original da Vinci, but as the work of one of the master’s students.
It wasn’t until 2011 — after professional conservators got ahold of the painting and repaired sloppy conservation work that had built up over the years — that art experts reassessed the "Salvator Mundi" and realized that it was likely painted by da Vinci himself. In 2017, a Saudi prince bought the painting at auction for a record-breaking $450 million.
Embedded within the painting is a persistent mystery. The orb held by Christ contains a few painted sparkles that look like inclusions within a solid sphere or crystal. But a solid orb would magnify and invert the image of anything behind it due to the refraction of light, and the orb in the painting doesn't do that. Christ's robes appear undistorted behind the glass.
Da Vinci was an avid student of optics and likely wouldn't have made that mistake carelessly. Art historians have been arguing for decades about what the orb was made of and whether Da Vinci deliberately painted it inaccurately. The new paper brings a method called physically based rendering to the question. UC Irvine computer scientist professors Michael Goodrich, Shuang Zhao and doctoral student Marco (Zhanhang) Liang used this method to simulate light in the scene that is depicted in the painting.
Controversy in lights
They found that a combination of dim environmental light, a strong light source from overhead and a hollow blown glass sphere could re-create the scene in the "Salvator Mundi." The glass could have had walls up to 0.05 inches (1.3 millimeters) thick without creating any refraction disrupting the lines of Christ's robes behind it, the researchers wrote in their paper posted on arXiv. (A hollow orb wouldn’t create the same magnify-and-flip effect as a solid orb.)
Liang and his colleagues declined to comment on their work, which Liang said is now under review at a scientific journal. Kemp was not convinced by the study, however. In a section of his new book, "Leonardo's Salvator Mundi and the Collecting of Leonardo in the Stuart Courts" (Oxford University Press, 2020), Kemp traces the context of the orb from entries in da Vinci’s journals, finding that the artist had a fascination with rock crystals and their optics at the time the "Salvator Mundi" was painted. He also lists examples of paintings in which da Vinci tweaked the laws of physics and light to create a more pleasing composition. In paintings of the baptism of Christ, for example, the painter and his contemporaries skipped depicting the refraction of light in water that would have made the figures' legs look skewed. Da Vinci also painted baby Jesus as unnaturally large, an artistic way to highlight the Christ child's divinity.
"His paintings were not raw demonstrations of optical science, any more than they were stark demonstrations of anatomy," Kemp wrote. In other words, da Vinci was known to use artistic license in his works, and likely did so with the orb in "Salvator Mundi."
Leonardo "is not making a 'photographic image,'" Kemp told Live Science. "If he was, all his 'Christ childs' would be the progeny of giants! He is using his knowledge of natural laws to give conviction to devotional paintings."
- 30 of the World's Most Valuable Treasures That Are Still Missing
- Flying Machines? 5 Da Vinci Designs That Were Ahead of Their Time
- In Photos: Leonardo Da Vinci's 'Mona Lisa'
Originally published on Live Science.
Live Science newsletter
Stay up to date on the latest science news by signing up for our Essentials newsletter.
Stephanie Pappas is a contributing writer for Live Science, covering topics ranging from geoscience to archaeology to the human brain and behavior. She was previously a senior writer for Live Science but is now a freelancer based in Denver, Colorado, and regularly contributes to Scientific American and The Monitor, the monthly magazine of the American Psychological Association. Stephanie received a bachelor's degree in psychology from the University of South Carolina and a graduate certificate in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz.
One quick thought -- Might the lack of refraction through a solid glass orb have been Da Vinci's way of acclaiming that the laws of nature were subservient to the Will of the Divine? Certainly, it would be difficult to assert otherwise, especially given the title of the painting.Reply
I would suggest he intended it to not be glass or an animate object at all instead to be representing and orb of another realm of reality. Scientists can be so narrow minded sometimes. In focusing on it needing to be a physical object they are missing the real genius of his work.Reply
Maybe it represents a particular spherical white stone of ancient that was once in existence in physical form but no longer is but still is, lol. It is neither here nor there. It is in his hand and cannot be removed, taken or stolen. It basically says good luck removing it from its rightful place. It can't be done.Reply
It could be that Da Vinci was just taking a short cut. letting the normal shape of the shirt show through, then painting the globe on as an afterthought.Reply
"Da Vinci" was not Leonardo's last name. It simply means he was from Vinci. Calling him "Da Vinci" is like calling Jesus "Of Nazareth".Reply
U R spot on, I would even say that the only part of Christ's hands visible are his finger tips, the palm inside the globe really represents a mountan.,or the earth, his robe,is not on the other side of the globe, it is the night sky, the Milky Way, the white specks are bright stars inside the globe....I think it's so obvious to a modern observer.JKale said:I would suggest he intended it to not be glass or an animate object at all instead to be representing and orb of another realm of reality. Scientists can be so narrow minded sometimes. In focusing on it needing to be a physical object they are missing the real genius of his work.
JKale said:I would suggest he intended it to not be glass or an animate object at all instead to be representing and orb of another realm of reality. Scientists can be so narrow minded sometimes. In focusing on it needing to be a physical object they are missing the real genius of his work.
Lmao, calling people "narrow minded" over a 15th-century painting is so absurd to me. Your guess is just as good as theirs, you will never in a million years know what Leonardo was really thinking painting that piece. He could've either been ignorant about that mistake or he had an ulterior motive making it. Nobody will ever know. I personally consider you the narrow-minded one in this context. :P
The orb is an ice sculpture. The painting shows the various colors of ice through light from black to blue to clear.Reply