90,000-year-old human footprints found on a Moroccan beach are some of the oldest and best preserved in the world

Ancient human footprints pressed into a sandy beach.
Researchers discovered 85 footprints made by humans thousands of years ago at a beach in Morocco. (Image credit: M. Sedrati, et al)

Two trails of ancient human footprints pressed into a beach in Morocco form one of the largest and best-preserved trackways in the world.

Researchers happened upon the footprint site near the northern tip of North Africa in 2022 while studying boulders at a nearby pocket beach, according to a study published Jan. 23 in the journal Scientific Reports

"Between tides, I said to my team that we should go north to explore another beach," study lead author Mouncef Sedrati, an associate professor of coastal dynamics and geomorphology at the University of Southern Brittany in France, told Live Science. "We were surprised to find the first print. At first, we weren't convinced it was a footprint, but then we found more of the trackway."

Related: 153,000-year-old footprints from South Africa are the oldest Homo sapiens tracks on record

Analysis of the site, which is the only known human trackway site of its kind in North Africa and the Southern Mediterranean, revealed two trails containing a total of 85 human footprints stamped into the beach by a group of at least five early modern humans. 

The team used optically stimulated luminescence dating, a technique that determines when specific minerals on or near an artifact were last exposed to heat or sunlight. Based on the age of the fine grains of quartz that make up the bulk of the gently sloped beach's sand, researchers determined that a multigenerational group of Homo sapiens walked on the beach roughly 90,000 years ago, creating the pathways. The event took place during the Late Pleistocene, also known as the last ice age, which ended around 11,700 years ago, according to the study.

"We took measurements on-site to determine the length and depth of the prints," Sedrati said. "Based on the foot pressure and size of the footprints, we were able to determine the approximate age of the individuals, which included children, adolescents and adults."

The researchers credit the excellent preservation of the ancient impressions to a number of factors, including the beach's layout and the long reach of the tides for "the final preservation of the footprints," according to the study.

"The exceptional thing is the position of the beach on a rocky platform that is covered in clay sediments," Sedrati said. "These sediments create good conditions to preserve the tracks on the sandbar while the tides rapidly buried the beach. That's why the footprints are so well preserved here."

However, the researchers remain uncertain about what the ice age group was doing on the beach, and future analysis of the site could reveal that information. But they'll have to act quickly, as "the ongoing collapse of the rocky shore platform … could lead to its eventual demise," including of the tracks preserved on it, the team wrote in the study.

"We hope to learn about the total history of this group of humans and what they were doing there," Sedrati said.

Jennifer Nalewicki
Live Science Staff Writer

Jennifer Nalewicki is a Salt Lake City-based journalist whose work has been featured in The New York Times, Smithsonian Magazine, Scientific American, Popular Mechanics and more. She covers several science topics from planet Earth to paleontology and archaeology to health and culture. Prior to freelancing, Jennifer held an Editor role at Time Inc. Jennifer has a bachelor's degree in Journalism from The University of Texas at Austin.

  • Sailormoonvslibs
    Hard to believe these so-called scientists or whatever they are still believe the Earth is 90, 000 years old much less the billions and trillions and gazillions of years they throw out there. They need to recognize we're not stupid and just own that they made a mistake, not continue the false narrative.
    Reply
  • sven
    Sailormoonvslibs said:
    Hard to believe these so-called scientists or whatever they are still believe the Earth is 90, 000 years old much less the billions and trillions and gazillions of years they throw out there. They need to recognize we're not stupid and just own that they made a mistake, not continue the false narrative.
    No trillions or gazillions, just billions.
    Reply
  • Jan Steinman
    Sailormoonvslibs said:
    Hard to believe these so-called scientists or whatever they are still believe the Earth is 90, 000 years old much less the billions and trillions and gazillions of years they throw out there. They need to recognize we're not stupid and just own that they made a mistake, not continue the false narrative.
    Would you care to document your assertions? What is your evidence, The Bible?
    Reply
  • cecilia fx
    Sailormoonvslibs said:
    Hard to believe these so-called scientists or whatever they are still believe the Earth is 90, 000 years old much less the billions and trillions and gazillions of years they throw out there. They need to recognize we're not stupid and just own that they made a mistake, not continue the false narrative.
    what?
    Reply
  • freeassociating
    Sailormoonvslibs said:
    Hard to believe these so-called scientists or whatever they are still believe the Earth is 90, 000 years old much less the billions and trillions and gazillions of years they throw out there. They need to recognize we're not stupid and just own that they made a mistake, not continue the false narrative.
    Agreed, we all know everything was made last thursday.
    Reply
  • akiprev
    Jan Steinman said:
    Would you care to document your assertions? What is your evidence, The Bible?
    No need for the Bible. Just see discernible dinosaur fosills sticking from ground (or even lying on it as I saw in China), and their prefectly preserved tracks. Then use your elementary school math to plot the damage made by erosion and the rock erosion rate (ca 40ft/my).
    Reply
  • saymyname
    The point the original commenter is making is if the scoence used for dating is wrong then our estimates will always be exaggerated. Uranium-thorium-lead dating according to a livescience article I read was used to date the Earth to 4.4 billion years, but again we can only use what information we have at this time. The issue is until a new science to date things is provided then the world will continue to utilize what we have available.
    Reply
  • akiprev
    cecilia fx said:
    what?
    If you're really interested what's all this is about, read my answer to Jan Steinman below this comment of yours.
    Reply
  • bolide
    akiprev said:
    No need for the Bible. Just see discernible dinosaur fosills sticking from ground (or even lying on it as I saw in China), and their prefectly preserved tracks. Then use your elementary school math to plot the damage made by erosion and the rock erosion rate (ca 40ft/my).
    Still at it? As I said to you before, there's no reason to suppose that fossils on the surface have been at the surface for more than a few years. In the case of this article, the article clearly states that the footprints were preserved by being rapidly buried in clay sediments.
    Reply
  • akiprev
    bolide said:
    Still at it? As I said to you before, there's no reason to suppose that fossils on the surface have been at the surface for more than a few years. In the case of this article, the article clearly states that the footprints were preserved by being rapidly buried in clay sediments.
    Whatever, if they were buried any considerable length of time before they would be clearly melted with the surroundings, not retaining their clear-cut shape.
    And how you mean that perfectly preserved dinos' tracks (just google for them, they are plenty out there) could have been under other sediments any such periods and then appear intact on the surface is beyond me.
    Reply