Celia Wexler is a senior Washington representative for the Scientific Integrity Initiative at UCS. An award-winning journalist, Wexler authored "Out of the News: Former Journalists Discuss a Profession in Crisis (opens in new tab)" (McFarland, 2012). This article is adapted from a post on the UCS blog The Equation.
When you work in Washington, D.C., the ongoing drama of the budget stalemate and government shutdown is a part of your daily life. The Metro is emptier, traffic is lighter and all our wonderful museums and monuments are closed.
Many meetings with legislative- and executive-branch staff are being cancelled. The specter of uncertainty hangs in the air. The newspapers are full of stories about weddings at the Jefferson Memorial that aren't taking place, or disappointed tourists wandering the city and finding shuttered attractions.
But the shutdown has a lot of casualties, and government science is one of them. The shutdown doesn't just stop the flow of money in government; it stops the flow of ideas. That impoverishes Americans more than we can know.
Before the shutdown, the Office of Management and Budget required each agency to develop contingency plans for how they would operate during a shutdown.
Those plans by themselves are extensive and comprehensive, and likely took a lot of federal staff resources that could have been better spent protecting public health and safety and the environment, and pursuing crucial federal research goals.
But reading the plans for just a few federal science agencies, you're struck by how much the federal science effort will be curtailed, even by a brief shutdown.
National Science Foundation
At the National Science Foundation (NSF), the plan is to shut down nearly all operations, furloughing 2,000 employees and contractors, and leaving a skeleton crew of 30. The universities, small businesses and other recipients of NSF grants can continue with research — as long as the recipients don't run out of money or need any help from NSF staff.
The NSF will retain communication with the researchers and support-staff they oversee in the Arctic and Antarctic, for obvious reasons — they don't want to leave anyone literally out in the cold should an emergency arise.
Department of Health and Human Services
The sprawling Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is the umbrella agency for a number of the nation's federal science agencies: the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Overall, HHS will be furloughing more than half its employees, more than 40,000 staffers in all.
At the NIH, anyone enrolled in a clinical trial will continue to receive care. As the contingency plan points out, individuals who undergo "investigational procedures" at the NIH Clinical Center have run out of other options for medical treatment. However, NIH won't be accepting any new patients during the shutdown, a terrible blow to those who had looked to the facility as their last hope.
Additionally, the 8,000 or so NIH staff working in the more than 1,100 NIH research labs are now idled. Only 734 staffers will be on hand to destroy some research materials that will be useless if research protocols can't be maintained, and to maintain cell lines and other research materials that are "invaluable" and must be saved. Consider the potentially life-saving experiments that researchers can't pursue, or may have to re-do because of the shutdown.
NIH also is responsible for the safekeeping of 1.35 million lab mice, 390,000 fish, 63,000 rats and 3,900 primates. Two dozen NIH facilities use those animals for research purposes. While the scientists won't be doing research work, the animals have to be cared for. As the NIH shutdown plan notes: "Many of these animals are priceless and have taken generations to breed."
During the shutdown, the CDC won't be planning for the flu season, just around the corner. Nor will it be able to use its gold-standard science to help states detect disease outbreaks.
The CDC's plan states that the agency will have a "significantly reduced capacity to respond to outbreak investigations, processing of laboratory samples, and maintaining the agency's 24/7 emergency operations center." The plan also states that CDC will be "unable to support the annual seasonal influenza program."
Among the actions the agency will not continue include outbreak detection, linking across state boundaries using genetic and molecular analysis, and infectious disease surveillance support for state and local partners.
As for the FDA, its employees won't be doing routine food-safety inspections, monitoring food imports, or "the majority of the laboratory research necessary to inform public health decision-making." [Scientists With Some Odd Jobs Still Working During Shutdown ]
Environmental Protection Agency
Scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also will be sidelined during a shutdown. EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy last week stated that a budget stalemate"will mean that EPA effectively shuts down." Federal officials had projected that fewer than 1,000 of the EPA's more than 16,000 employees will be working during the shutdown.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has furloughed 97 percent of its employees and won't be using social media platforms, like Instagram, during the shutdown.
Halting the flow of ideas
The shutdown disrupts more than the federal science that generates research products and informs oversight and regulation. It also disrupts the communication of federal data to scientists who work outside the government. If you're a scientist working anywhere in the country — or the world, for that matter — and your work relies on access to up-to-date federal information, you may be out of luck.
For example, the National Climate Data Center, based in Asheville, N.C., was closed on Monday, shutting down a vital pipeline for researchers outside the government.
That closure, combined with the furloughs of thousands of scientists at NASA, EPA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the Department of Interior also means that federal efforts to better understand and predict climate change, hurricanes and other natural disasters are largely on hold.
The halt of federal funds even stops unpaid experts who advise the government on scientific and other matters. Effective October 1, federal advisory panels working on issues as diverse as dietary guidelines and climate change were stopped dead in their tracks.
Even if the shutdown doesn't last long, its impact on federal science will have long-lasting effects. You can't recapture lost time, or easily calculate the losses that stem from scientific breakthroughs that didn't happen, or happened late — or identify the promising federal researchers who lose heart.
This Op-Ed was adapted from "When the Government Shuts Down, So Does Federal Science" on the UCS blog The Equation. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher. This version of the article was originally published on Live Science.