AI drone that could hunt and kill people built in just hours by scientist 'for a game'

View of drone with camera flying over city.
Luis Wenus, an entrepreneur and engineer, incorporated AI and facial recognition into the small drone so it could chase people down at full speed. (Image credit: simonkr via Getty Images)

It only takes a few hours to configure a small, commercially available drone to hunt down a target by itself, a scientist has warned.

Luis Wenus, an entrepreneur and engineer, incorporated an artificial intelligence (AI) system into a small drone to chase people around "as a game," he wrote in a post on March 2 on X, formerly known as Twitter. But he soon realized it could easily be configured to contain an explosive payload.

Collaborating with Robert Lukoszko, another engineer, he configured the drone to use an object-detection model to find people and fly toward them at full speed, he said. The engineers also built facial recognition into the drone, which works at a range of up to 33 feet (10 meters). This means a weaponized version of the drone could be used to attack a specific person or set of targets.

Related: 3 scary breakthroughs AI will make in 2024

"This literally took just a few hours to build, and made me realize how scary it is," Wenus wrote. "You could easily strap a small amount of explosives on these and let 100's of them fly around. We check for bombs and guns but THERE ARE NO ANTI-DRONE SYSTEMS FOR BIG EVENTS & PUBLIC SPACES YET."

Wenus described himself as an "open source absolutist," meaning he believes in always sharing code and software through open source channels. He also identifies as an "e/acc" — which is a school of thinking among AI researchers that refers to wanting to accelerate AI research regardless of the downsides, due to a belief that the upsides will always outweigh them. He said, however, that he would not publish any code relating to this experiment.

See more

He also warned that a terror attack could be orchestrated in the near future using this kind of technology. While people need technical knowledge to engineer such a system, it will become easier and easier to write the software as time passes, partially due to advancements in AI as an assistant in writing code, he noted.

Wenus said his experiment showed that society urgently needs to build anti-drone systems for civilian spaces where large crowds could gather. There are several countermeasures that society can build, according to Robin Radar, including cameras, acoustic sensors and radar to detect drones. Disrupting them, however, could require technologies such as radio frequency jammers, GPS spoofers, net guns, as well as high-energy lasers.

While such weapons haven't been deployed in civilian environments, they have been previously conceptualized and deployed in the context of warfare. Ukraine, for example, has developed explosive drones in response to Russia's invasion, according to the Wall Street Journal (WSJ).

The U.S. military is also working on ways to build and control swarms of small drones that can attack targets. It follows the U.S. Navy's efforts after it first demonstrated that it could control a swarm of 30 drones with explosives in 2017, according to MIT Technology Review.

Keumars Afifi-Sabet
Channel Editor, Technology

Keumars is the technology editor at Live Science. He has written for a variety of publications including ITPro, The Week Digital, ComputerActive, The Independent, The Observer, Metro and TechRadar Pro. He has worked as a technology journalist for more than five years, having previously held the role of features editor with ITPro. He is an NCTJ-qualified journalist and has a degree in biomedical sciences from Queen Mary, University of London. He's also registered as a foundational chartered manager with the Chartered Management Institute (CMI), having qualified as a Level 3 Team leader with distinction in 2023.


  • Giovani
    admin said:
    The scientist who configured a small drone to target people with facial recognition and chase them at full speed warns we have no defenses against such weapons.

    AI drone that could hunt and kill people built in just hours by scientist for 'a game : Read more
    Humankind is the most predictable animal. Anything which can possibly be used in violent fashion will be.
    I recall when drone technology was introduced, and immediately the human factor discolored any peaceable usage. Humans supply their own shelf life.
    It's obvious the path we are on in general, is terminal. It always has been, only now our historical imperfections culminate in lethality to societies.
    It begins with a drone, a perfect example of human nature heading for dissolution.
    Reply
  • shela702
    You fellows win. You have achieved the rank of those who are the ultimate haters of mankind.
    Reply
  • Giovani
    shela702 said:
    You fellows win. You have achieved the rank of those who are the ultimate haters of mankind.
    The ultimate haters are those who espouse their ideals as legitimate, while creating a substandard and terminal reality.
    Real people are becoming rare, but we can constantly be engaged in letting the forces of evil know there are those who are watching intently.
    Not only do I not give up, but there is also coming a very uncomfortable time in America while the forces of terminality are disposed of permanently.
    Reply
  • sven
    Giovani said:
    Humankind is the most predictable animal. Anything which can possibly be used in violent fashion will be.
    I recall when drone technology was introduced, and immediately the human factor discolored any peaceable usage. Humans supply their own shelf life.
    It's obvious the path we are on in general, is terminal. It always has been, only now our historical imperfections culminate in lethality to societies.
    It begins with a drone, a perfect example of human nature heading for dissolution.
    Much of our technology was originally developed for military use but benefited humanity. The internet and space rockets come to mind. I do, however, agree that the odds for civilization longevity aren't great.
    Reply
  • sven
    Maybe the military can improve the accuracy of their assassination drone program.
    Reply