Car-size asteroid discovered 2 days ago flies by Earth at 1/30th the distance of the moon

Orbital trajectories of Earth and asteroid 2024 GJ2.
Orbital trajectories of Earth and asteroid 2024 GJ2. (Image credit: NASA)

An asteroid discovered Tuesday (April 9) made an extremely close, but harmless, pass by planet Earth today (April 11).

Asteroid 2024 GJ2 is roughly the size of a car and, since its discovery this week, astronomers calculated that the space rock would graze by Earth at a mere 12-thousand-mile (19.3-thousand-kilometer) distance — that's just three percent the distance between the Earth and the moon. 2024 GJ2 measures between 2.5 and 5 meters (8.2 and 16 feet), according to the European Space Agency (ESA). This means it's an asteroid with a weight-class that would have burned up in Earth's atmosphere, if its orbit happened to intersect ours more directly.

Astronomers believe the asteroid's closest approach distance to Earth occurred at 2:28:42 p.m. EDT (18:28:42 GMT) on Thursday, at a distance of 7,641 miles (12,298 kilometers).

Related: 'Planet killer' asteroids are hiding in the sun's glare. Can we stop them in time?

The next closest flyby of 2024 GJ2 won't occur until 2093, according to ESA's near-Earth objects coordination center. When that happens, the asteroid won't pass nearly as close as it did today. GJ2's 2093 approach is estimated to fly as close as 127,970 miles (205,947 kilometers) to us — 10 times further than today's flyby, and just over half the distance between Earth and the moon.

NASA has cataloged nearly 35,000 near-Earth asteroids to date, though very few of those pose any threat to the planet.

Originally posted on Space.com.

Writer, Content Manager

Josh Dinner is Space.com's Content Manager. He is a writer and photographer with a passion for science and space exploration, and has been working the space beat since 2016. Josh has covered the evolution of NASA's commercial spaceflight partnerships, from early Dragon and Cygnus cargo missions to the ongoing development and launches of crewed missions to the International Space Station, and spent much of 2022 chronicling the epic of NASA's Artemis 1 rocket. He also enjoys building 1:144 scale models of rockets and human-flown spacecraft. Find some of Josh's launch photography on Instagram and at his website, and follow him on Twitter, where he mostly posts in haiku.

  • Mr T
    30 times closer? That's a nonsensical statement, it should be one-thirtieth of the distance, or 3.3% of the distance.
    Reply
  • prrawlins
    The Super heavy is bigger then that
    Reply
  • Steamdude
    admin said:
    A newly discovered asteroid got within 12,000 miles of Earth on a harrowing, ultra-close approach today. The space rock won't return for 70 years.

    Car-size asteroid discovered 2 days ago flies 30 times closer to Earth than the moon : Read more
    Someone needs to revisit basic arithmetic and actually proofread what they write. In one place you say "graze by Earth at a mere 12-thousand-mile (19.3-thousand-kilometer) distance", and later in the same article you write "at a distance of 7,641 miles (12,298 kilometers)". So which is it?

    Did you know that NASA lost a Mars probe mixing English and metric measurements?
    Reply
  • prrawlins
    prrawlins said:
    The Super heavy is bigger then that
    Reply
  • The Decider
    Even the walk back didn't account for all the errors in this article.
    Reply
  • Steamdude
    The Decider said:
    Even the walk back didn't account for all the errors in this article.
    Someone really phoned this one in, didn't they?
    Reply
  • The Decider
    Steamdude said:
    Someone needs to revisit basic arithmetic and actually proofread what they write. In one place you say "graze by Earth at a mere 12-thousand-mile (19.3-thousand-kilometer) distance", and later in the same article you write "at a distance of 7,641 miles (12,298 kilometers)". So which is it?

    Did you know that NASA lost a Mars probe mixing English and metric measurements?
    Right! And at a cost of something like $120 million (1999) dollars. And NASA's nonchalant public attitude about the error was disgusting, as if not checking and double checking measurement and calculations, was anything but a major blunder, lead to a lot of the public asking why taxpayer money is used for space exploration. I personally think space exploration is not only interesting and a worthy endeavor, but a necessary science.
    Reply
  • Steamdude
    The Decider said:
    Right! And at a cost of something like $120 million (1999) dollars. And NASA's nonchalant public attitude about the error was disgusting, as if not checking and double checking measurement and calculations, was anything but a major blunder, lead to a lot of the public asking why taxpayer money is used for space exploration. I personally think space exploration is not only interesting and a worthy endeavor, but a necessary science.
    Agree
    Reply
  • Manic M
    Harrowing? What was acutely distressing or painful about a space rock passing by?
    Just another example how our society has LOWERED its standards for journalism..
    Getting sick of these junor school reports..
    Get some language education before writing science articles.
    Reply