Scientists say dehydrating the stratosphere could be plausible option to combat climate change

Wispy clouds in a sunlit sky,
The stratosphere is a layer of Earth's atmosphere that sits above the troposphere. (Image credit: Max Dollner)

Water vapor in the stratosphere forms a sponge-like barrier that prevents heat radiating from Earth from escaping out into space. Now, scientists are exploring the plausibility of dehydrating this layer of the atmosphere to cool our warming planet.

The stratosphere extends between 7.5 and 31 miles (12 and 50 kilometers) above Earth's surface and sits above another layer of the atmosphere called the troposphere. Water naturally circulating in the troposphere leaks into the stratosphere — but this leak is not uniform across the planet, according to a study published Wednesday (Feb. 28) in the journal Science Advances.

"It turns out that most of the air is entering the stratosphere in the tropics," lead author Joshua (Shuka) Schwarz, a physicist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Chemical Sciences Laboratory, told Live Science. 

One small region above northern Australia appears to be particularly important in controlling the upward movement of air and water vapor. 

"If we could do something just in that little area, maybe we could reduce stratospheric water vapor in order to let more infrared radiation out [into space] — that's the basic idea," Schwarz said.

Schwarz and his colleagues tested their idea using water vapor and temperature data from NASA's Airborne Tropical Tropopause Experiment (ATTREX) campaign, as well as computer models simulating the removal of water vapor from air just before it enters the stratosphere.

Related: Michael Mann: Yes, we can still stop the worst effects of climate change. Here's why.

Once in the stratosphere, air disperses away from the tropics toward the poles for up to four years before returning to the troposphere. That's why the most effective way to control water vapor is to catch it before it crosses into the stratosphere. "We've got a honey gate, where if we open it, a lot of honey comes out, and if we close it, we stop the honey flow," said Schwarz, whose hobbies include beekeeping.

Water high up in the troposphere comes in the form of either vapor or ice particles, Schwarz said. For water vapor to crystalize into ice — and precipitate down instead of entering the stratosphere — there needs to be enough ice already there for the vapor to freeze, or so much water vapor that it spontaneously forms an ice cloud.

Airplane contrails form when hot exhaust turns into ice crystals and are "a demonstration of some of this [intentional stratospheric dehydration] working," Schwarz said.  (Image credit: Richard Newstead via Getty Images)

In places where these conditions aren't met, such as the leaky spot above Australia, ice crystals can form around floating particles of mineral dust known as ice-nucleating particles.

In the study, Schwarz and his colleagues explored the plausibility of seeding the air in the region above Australia with such ice-nucleating particles. "If we put in some particles that would make it easy for ice to form, then ice will form," Schwarz said. "It will make a short-lived cloud that will fall to lower altitudes, quickly getting warmer, probably evaporating, and now that air that's going on its way to the stratosphere no longer has that water."

By repeatedly injecting particles "where it matters," Schwarz posits that scientists could gradually dehydrate the stratosphere and offset one-seventieth of the warming caused by climate change.

"It's only a tiny step in the right direction," Schwarz said, and the potential side effects are also small. "Water vapor naturally changes in the stratosphere due to seasonal changes, and the amount we're talking about changing it is much smaller than that seasonal change."

The details of the proposed strategy remain fuzzy. The models in the study assume the use of particles of bismuth triiodide — a material that is also being considered for another type of climate engineering known as cirrus cloud thinning.

"There's a lot of concern about climate intervention," Schwarz said. "What I think is that with more understanding, we'll be in a better place to make good decisions. We're learning about possibilities and we didn't uncover anything that seems impossible."

Sascha Pare
Trainee staff writer

Sascha is a U.K.-based trainee staff writer at Live Science. She holds a bachelor’s degree in biology from the University of Southampton in England and a master’s degree in science communication from Imperial College London. Her work has appeared in The Guardian and the health website Zoe. Besides writing, she enjoys playing tennis, bread-making and browsing second-hand shops for hidden gems.

  • Overlord Damon
    Let's take a system that is so complex our best supercomputers can't accurately model it, then poke it and see what happens. Even better that we all have to live with the results, right?

    "Oh, everyone is dead? /sigh Well... that's unfortunate. But at least we finally stopped the war in Ukraine."
    Reply
  • Broadlands
    Presumably all of this bizarre and theoretical "geoengineering" will require transportation and none of it will be done using EVs. That means conventional vehicles will be used and that would add both water and CO2. Unintended consequences?
    Reply
  • sven
    Overlord Damon said:
    Let's take a system that is so complex our best supercomputers can't accurately model it, then poke it and see what happens. Even better that we all have to live with the results, right?

    "Oh, everyone is dead? /sigh Well... that's unfortunate. But at least we finally stopped the war in Ukraine."
    I'm confident that a little cloud seeding over the tropics won't kill everyone. Some people are so dramatic.
    Reply
  • sven
    Broadlands said:
    Presumably all of this bizarre and theoretical "geoengineering" will require transportation and none of it will be done using EVs. That means conventional vehicles will be used and that would add both water and CO2. Unintended consequences?
    This is the mildest form of geoengineering I've read about. What a cunning sleuth you are. You just dismantled a scientific paper with 2 sentences in a comment section.
    Reply
  • Thomas Thompson
    Instead of doing the things that everyone can do to save this planet from a Venus-like fate, we're dreaming up Rube Goldberg solutions on a massive geo-engineering scale. If we enforce the laws already on the books and police the polluters, tax the rich to pay for it, we can reduce our emissions drastically. Unfortunately for everyone on the planet, there are billions of poor people who will do whatever is possible to survive and accumulate wealth, and damn the planet!
    Reply
  • Broadlands
    You write that "we can reduce our emissions drastically" Yes we can... but that will take none of the CO2 already added out of the atmosphere. Moreover, it will make the energy transition to renewables and EVs very difficult and expensive because conventional vehicles do all of the transportation involved with delivering and installing renewables like solar and wind farm projects. That will add more CO2 which will increase photosynthetic productivity and turn the Earth greener as is already seen from NASA satellites. That will help to improve agriculture for all those poor people you complain about.
    Reply
  • cecilia fx
    Overlord Damon said:
    Let's take a system that is so complex our best supercomputers can't accurately model it, then poke it and see what happens. Even better that we all have to live with the results, right?

    "Oh, everyone is dead? /sigh Well... that's unfortunate. But at least we finally stopped the war in Ukraine."
    well, aren't you a ray of sunshine
    Reply
  • bolide
    Did somebody mention contrails? There are thousands of passenger jetliners traveling just below the stratosphere every single day, incidentally producing a bit of this dehydrating effect with their contrails. What if we could add something to these planes, or their fuel, that would multiply their nucleating effect? If atmospheric dehydration is worth anything, it will need to be done at scale. Perhaps we have the infrastructure for that already in place.
    Reply