20,000-year-old cave painting 'dots' are the earliest written language, study claims. But not everyone agrees.

A 21,500-year-old cave painting depicting an aurochs, an extinct cattle species, in the Lascaux caves in France. Notice the four dots (within the digital yellow circle), which may have had a special meaning for ice age peoples. (Image credit: JoJan; Wikimedia Commons; (CC BY 4.0))

At least 20,000 years ago, humans living in Europe created striking cave paintings of animals that they paired with curious signs: lines, dots and Y-shaped symbols. These marks, which are well known to researchers, might relate to the seasonal behavior of prey animals, making the signs the first known writing in the history of humankind, a new study claims.

Although Paleolithic cave art is better known for its graceful horses and ghostly handprints, there are thousands of nonfigurative or abstract marks that researchers have begun studying only in the past few decades. In a study published Jan. 5 in the Cambridge Archaeology Journal (opens in new tab), a team of scholars suggests that these seemingly abstract dots and lines, when positioned near animal imagery, actually represent a sophisticated writing system that explains early humans' understanding of the mating and birthing seasons of important local species.

Other researchers, however, are not convinced by the study's interpretations of these human-made marks. 

Melanie Chang (opens in new tab), a paleoanthropologist at Portland State University who was not involved in the study, told Live Science in an email that she agrees with the researchers' assessment that "Upper Palaeolithic people had the cognitive capacity to write and to keep records of time." However, she cautioned that the researchers' "hypotheses are not well-supported by their results, and they also do not address alternative interpretations of the marks they analyzed."

Related: Back to the Stone Age: 17 key milestones in Paleolithic life

This image of an 17,000-year-old engraved salmon, from Pindal cave in Asturias, Spain, has three lines placed within. (Image credit: Berenguer, M.)

What do the painted marks mean?

Early humans in Europe were hunter-gatherers who ate a lot of meat from species such as horses, deer and bison. When those animals came together seasonally in herds, they would have been vulnerable to slaughter by humans. "It follows that knowledge of the timing of migrations, mating and birthing would be a central concern to Upper Paleolithic behaviour," study first author Bennett Bacon (opens in new tab), an independent researcher and furniture conservator based in London, and colleagues wrote in their study. 

Looking at the total number of marks — either dots or lines — found in sequences across hundreds of caves, the researchers discovered that none of the series contained more than 13 marks, consistent with the 13 lunar months in each year. "We hypothesize that sequences are conveying information about their associated animal taxa in units of months," they wrote, noting that spring, "with its obvious signals of the end of winter and corresponding faunal migrations to breeding grounds, would have provided an obvious, if regionally differing, point of origin for the lunar calendar."

An annotated image of a roughly 23,000-year-old painting showing four dots associated with a red ochre drawing of an aurochs in La Pasiega cave in Cantabria, Spain. (Image credit: Henri Breuli)

The researchers' statistical analysis of more than 800 sequences of marks associated with animals supports their idea — they found strong correlations between the number of marks and the lunar months in which the specific animal is known to mate. 

Taking their hypothesis a step further, Bacon and colleagues focused on a Y-shaped sign that they think refers to a particular event in an animal's life cycle. Similar statistical analysis supports their conclusion that the placement of the Y-shaped sign within a series of marks signals an animal species' birthing season.

"The ability to assign abstract signs to phenomena in the world," they wote, "to record past events and predict future events, was a profound intellectual achievement." 

Writing or proto-writing?

But is this the earliest known writing? Bacon and colleagues demur, suggesting that "it is best described as a proto-writing system, an intermediary step between a simpler notation/convention and full-blown writing."

April Nowell (opens in new tab), a Paleolithic archaeologist at the University of Victoria in Canada who was not involved in this study, told Live Science by email that "any study that explores non-figurative signs in more detail is welcome, but I think there are a number of assumptions being made here that have yet to be proven." Nowell questioned the Y sign, in particular. "The majority of animals considered in this study are quadrupeds, and humans normally squat giving birth," she said. "If this sign is supposed to be iconic of the birth process, it is not obvious to me."

Related: One of the oldest written sentences on record blasts hair and beard lice

Chang, the paleoanthropologist who is also an equestrian and horse owner, posed two alternative explanations for the Y sign. In some cases, it could represent the edge of the brachiocephalic muscle, a prominent landmark on a horse's neck. "In other cases," she said, "it is possible that what they recorded as Y's represent what modern horsepeople refer to as 'primitive markings' such as leg bars that are associated with wild-type horse colors, or they may represent hair patterns, or other anatomical features."

Study co-author Robert Kentridge (opens in new tab), a professor in the Department of Psychology at Durham University in the U.K., told Live Science in an email that one of the strengths of their study is that they "have formally tested Ben [Bacon's] hypotheses about the meaning of the Y-sign's position in sequences of marks and the lengths of sequences of dots and lines and shown that these do convey meaning, indeed meaning that would be important in the lives of Palaeolithic hunters."

In summarizing their conclusions, Bacon and colleagues wrote that they have "proposed the existence of a notational system associated with an unambiguous animal subject relating to biologically significant events" and that this allows them "for the first time to understand a Palaeolithic notational system in its entirety."

Nonfigurative signs dating to 15,000 years ago that hunter-gatherers drew in black manganese and red ochre in Niaux Cave in the French Pyrenees. (Image credit: Neanderthal Museum, Mettmann)

A decade ago, however, Nowell and then-graduate student Genevieve von Petzinger (opens in new tab) co-created a database of dozens of signs and repeating motifs from more than 200 caves in southern France and Spain. Von Petzinger's thesis (opens in new tab) detailed patterns of cave wall symbols across time and space in order to better understand what these signs meant for ice age people. "There are at least 32 different recurring signs," Nowell explained. "The authors have chosen to study three of them in a very specific context." 

But the authors defended their decision to focus on the trio.

"It seemed sensible to focus first on the most common markings associated with figurative images," study co-author Paul Pettitt (opens in new tab), a professor of archaeology at Durham University, told Live Science in an email. "Simple dots and lines are by far the most common. Of the more elaborate signs, the Y sign is the most common."

The researchers plan to expand on their work. "We are analyzing other signs," Bacon told Live Science in an email. "Rather than searching for the meaning of individual signs, what we are looking for is the linguistic and cognitive bases that underpin the 'writing' system."

Nowell agreed with the study authors that the symbols were likely not randomly chosen and that it is possible the lines and dots represent numbers. Even if the authors are correct, she noted, that leaves 90% of the signs without any known meaning. 

"There is still a lot about graphic communication in the Paleolithic that we do not understand," Nowell said.

Kristina Killgrove
Live Science contributor

Kristina Killgrove is an archaeologist with specialties in ancient human skeletons and science communication. Her academic research has appeared in numerous scientific journals, while her news stories and essays have been published in venues such as Forbes, Mental Floss and Smithsonian. Kristina earned a doctorate in anthropology from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and also holds bachelor's and master's degrees in classical archaeology.


  • Jeremy
    The dots and lines could well mean something. They do not look like natural colorations of the animals, and many were not part of animal drawings. I wouldn't quite call it "writing" but rather a notational system. Modern human activities also use notation systems, such as music, surveying, various engineering symbols, astrology, carpenters' marks and electronics, to name a few. Researchers may be able to train an artificial intelligence system on a training set and then show it images it hasn't seen before to see if they're reliably deciphered.
    Reply
  • Ryonen
    Very interesting article. I do find myself wondering about the fact that the article states "...the researchers discovered that none of the series contained more than 13 marks...". And yet, one of the images included with the article seems to rather clearly show a group of 14 dots. Granted, it is presented in two rows of 7, but to my uninformed eye, it feels more like a group of 14, arranged in two rows for convenience.
    Reply
  • Tambria
    Wonder if the 73k year old hashtag silica flake from Blombos Cavestone will be similarly found to be a designated tool labeled by the scribe of that time…
    Reply