Skip to main content

How will the coronavirus outbreak end?

A woman with a face mask at an airport.
(Image credit: Shutterstock)

Despite worldwide efforts to contain the new coronavirus, hotspots continue to emerge, and the number of cases is on the rise.

It's been only a couple of months since the virus, called SARS-CoV-2, made its first public appearance in a seafood-and-live-animal market in Wuhan, China. Since then, the virus has hopped borders, infected over 82,500 people and killed 2,810. But as with all past outbreaks, this one will eventually come to an end.

So, how will this story wrap up? Experts say one possibility is that cases of the disease will start decreasing when enough people develop immunity, either through infection or vaccination. Another possible scenario is that the virus will continue to circulate and establish itself as a common respiratory virus.

The possibility of containment

At this point, it's very unlikely that the outbreak will be contained to a few locations experts say.

"It is increasingly likely that this virus will spread worldwide," said Aubree Gordon, an associate professor of epidemiology at the University of Michigan. "We still may have some chance to contain it, but that window does appear to be closing."

The outbreak already meets two criteria of a pandemic: SARS-CoV-2 can infect people and cause illness, and it can spread easily from person to person, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said at a news conference Tuesday (Feb. 25). As the virus begins to infect communities in more countries, it is coming closer to meeting the third criterion: worldwide spread of the virus.

Around 95% of the cases of COVID-19, the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, are in mainland China. However, spikes are occurring in other countries, including South Korea, Iran, Italy, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand and Japan. On Wednesday (Feb. 26), the CDC announced the first case of likely "community spread" of the virus, in a northern California patient with no ties to a hard-hit region.

Related: The 9 deadliest viruses on Earth

The best way to control the virus or slow its spread is through containment measures such as quarantines and travel restrictions, Gordon told Live Science. Indeed, there's been a worldwide effort to stop the spread of this new coronavirus. Some efforts, such as the quarantines on the Diamond Princess cruise ship, might have had limited success, Live Science previously reported

But containing the spread of the virus will be extremely difficult, Gordon said. There are a few reasons for that: SARS-CoV-2 spreads very easily, most cases of COVID-19 aren't severe and thus may not be identified, and the virus has a long incubation period, or the time between when a person is infected and when they start showing symptoms, Gordon said. 

What's more, all containment efforts are based on what we know about the virus, and there's still much we don't know. Quarantine periods are typically 14 days, based on early studies that suggested that was the longest possible incubation period for the virus. But there's some evidence that the incubation period might be much longer. 

For instance, local news reports from China's Hubei province (where the first human cases of the disease appeared) claimed that a 70-year-old man who was infected with the coronavirus didn't show symptoms until 27 days after infection, according to The Washington Post. The most common ways the virus is thought to spread are through respiratory droplets and via contact with an infected person, but it's still unclear if the virus can spread before symptoms begin.

And there's still a possibility that the coronavirus began to spread before we even knew it existed. "I think it is already a pandemic," said Dr. Amesh Adalja, an infectious-disease specialist and a senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in Baltimore. "I do believe that there likely have been cases in the U.S. and other places that went unrecognized, especially since the vast majority are mild and indistinguishable from other causes of the common cold."

If containment efforts fail and this indeed becomes a pandemic, "there are two ways that it could end," Gordon told Live Science. Either enough people will develop immunity — either through infection or vaccination — that the virus will stop transmitting and is eliminated, or the virus will continue to circulate and establish itself as a common respiratory virus.

A natural trickle-off

Pandemics end when the virus doesn't have enough susceptible people to infect. 

The catastrophic 1918 Spanish flu pandemic is thought to have infected 500 million people worldwide, many of them soldiers living in close quarters fighting in World War I. Once the war ended and people dispersed, the spread slowed as people had less contact. But the flu was ultimately halted in part because those who survived it had immunity and the virus didn't hop as easily as it did at the beginning. 

If the virus comes into contact with another person but that person isn't susceptible to the disease, then that chain of transmission is snuffed out. If one person infects two, those people together infect four and so on, and eventually, the virus runs out of susceptible people to infect, said Joshua Epstein, a professor of epidemiology at New York University. "What happens typically is that enough people get the bug that there just aren't enough susceptible people to keep the chain going."

Related: 10 deadly diseases that hopped across species

If SARS-CoV-2 is like common strains of the flu (or like other coronaviruses that cause the common cold), there's also a chance that the number of infections may die down as the weather warms up. It could then have a resurgence this fall and winter.

But "I think it's premature to assume that," Dr. Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC's National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, said at a news conference on Feb. 12. 

Theoretically, environmental conditions may affect the transmission of a virus, and that's why some viruses have seasonality, Gordon said. "However, it really isn't clear, as viruses like influenza have just as big of a burden in tropical areas as temperate ones." 

Another possibility is that SARS-CoV-2 will mutate in a potentially beneficial way, making it more difficult for the virus to infect people. Back in 2002, a similar coronavirus in the Guangdong province of southern China first hopped to humans from animals and caused an outbreak of an infection that became known as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS).

SARS spread to 26 other countries, including Canada, sparking fear that the disease would become widespread in North America. "When SARS came to Canada, we were worried that this was going to be another epicenter," said Dr. Eric Cioe-Peña, an emergency room physician and the director of global health at Northwell Health in New York. 

But the outbreak ended up petering out, in part due to good public health containment, he said. But it also was because SARS randomly mutated — as viruses commonly do — and became much more severe but harder to transmit to humans, he said. 

A vaccine for eradication

But health officials aren't just sitting back and waiting to see how the virus will behave; researchers worldwide are racing to find a vaccine and treatment for SARS-CoV-2. Because the virus has "established itself in human populations, a vaccine is the only way to eradicate it," Adalja said. 

Recently, a group of researchers mapped out the detailed structure of the so-called spike protein that the new coronavirus uses to latch onto and infect human cells, potentially opening the door to a vaccine. The idea is that if people were to be injected with a spike-protein-based vaccine, their bodies would make antibodies against it so that, if they were ever exposed to the real virus, they would have immunity, Live Science previously reported.

But the problem with vaccines is that "it takes so long to go from the potential vaccine to the animal model to the types of clinical trials [needed], and there's only so many steps you can cut out without jeopardizing safety," Cioe-Peña said. And so a vaccine isn't going to help with the spread of the virus in epicenters right now, he added. 

Still, experts think a vaccine is likely 18 to 24 months away, which is still expedited from the 10 years it typically takes, according to the Live Science report. But the fact that experts are continuing to develop a vaccine means that they don't think SARS-CoV-2 will disappear anytime soon, Epstein said. If health officials thought the virus would vanish soon, "then building a vaccine for the future would not make much sense," Epstein told Live Science. "There's a sense in which it may not end."

A lingering virus

"I think it's unlikely that this coronavirus — because it's so readily transmissible — will disappear completely," said Dr. William Schaffner, an infectious-disease specialist at Vanderbilt University in Tennessee. 

Eradication of a disease is "difficult and rarely achieved," according to the World Health Organization. For that to happen, there must be an available intervention to interrupt transmission, there must be diagnostic tools to detect cases that could lead to transmission and humans must be the only reservoir for the virus, they wrote. 

Even if the coronavirus is eradicated among humans, if the virus continues to survive in its natural form in animal reservoirs, those reservoirs can put the virus back into circulation, Epstein said. "I think it's always possible the thing has one cycle, we nail it, it doesn't mutate and it's eradicated," he added. "But I think the most likely prospect is that we don't entirely eradicate it."

There's a chance that, even if we manage to quench this virus, it might turn into a seasonal disease, making a comeback every year like other seasonal diseases such as the flu or colds, Epstein said. If that happens, there's a chance it could have less of an impact during subsequent circulations because more people will have built up immunity, Adalja said. But it's not clear if humans can become reinfected with this virus yet, Gordon said.

People can get reinfected by the other circulating coronaviruses because our immunity to them wanes over time. Immunity doesn't wane with every virus, however. With viruses such as the one that causes measles, once someone has it or has been vaccinated against it, they won't become reinfected, Schaffner said.

Though waning immunity is the most likely cause for reinfection, it's also possible that viruses might mutate just enough to evade the immune system. "But right now, there is no evidence that the coronavirus is mutating in any significant way," Gordon said. "The viral sequences that are available are nearly identical."

It's difficult to predict how the virus will behave. 

"Some of them reoccur; some of them don't," Epstein said. The virus that caused SARS had a relatively low mutation rate, so it didn't reoccur;  influenza, by contrast, has a really high mutation rate and thus reoccurs every year. If SARS-CoV-2 manages to mutate substantially in the coming months, the vaccines scientists produce now might not be well matched by the time it reoccurs, he added.

But even if you can't predict what will happen with the virus, you can prepare for it, Epstein said.

It's impossible to block people from all affected countries, he said. But people can take steps to reduce the number of infections in their area — such as screening and aggressively testing for the virus, isolating cases, canceling mass gatherings, partaking in household isolation and observing normal public health practices and good hygiene — "in the hopes that we won't have a big outbreak," he said. 

In the worst-case scenario, we might have a "substantial epidemic in the United States," he added. "I don't think anybody's prepared to put an actual number on it."

Originally published on Live Science.

OFFER: Save at least 53% with our latest magazine deal!

With impressive cutaway illustrations that show how things function, and mindblowing photography of the world’s most inspiring spectacles, How It Works represents the pinnacle of engaging, factual fun for a mainstream audience keen to keep up with the latest tech and the most impressive phenomena on the planet and beyond. Written and presented in a style that makes even the most complex subjects interesting and easy to understand, How It Works is enjoyed by readers of all ages.
View Deal

Yasemin Saplakoglu
Yasemin is a staff writer at Live Science, writing about biology and neuroscience, among other science topics. Yasemin has a biomedical engineering bachelors from the University of Connecticut and a science communication graduate certificate from the University of California, Santa Cruz. When she's not writing, she's probably taking photos or sitting upside-down on her couch thinking about thinking and wondering if anyone else is thinking about thinking at the exact same time.
  • David J Franks
    The only reason this virus is causing a lot of trouble is because, it's got a name, it's traceable and you see big coloured pictures of it on the television. 50 years ago it would just be called a cough and that would be the end of it, and no one would panic.
  • We make good pets II
    David I agree. When will it all end, all this hype and nonsense? I'll tell you when. When something bigger and better comes along.
    I'm just pissed off at all this nonsense . How do you feel about the flu hype? I have to wear a mask to work because I refused my flu shot. Its the flu for crying out loud!
  • Crownlife
    David J Franks said:
    The only reason this virus is causing a lot of trouble is because, it's got a name, it's traceable and you see big coloured pictures of it on the television. 50 years ago it would just be called a cough and that would be the end of it, and no one would panic.
    Exactly. I also thought if this outbreak occurred 50 years ago, or before we had the ability to distinguish individual strains, we would not be able to trace the spread of this particular strain, so it would just be another cold/flu season. It might not even be a higher than normal year of fatalities when taken as a whole across all respiratory-related fatalities.
  • alfie
    Phillip said:
    On thing I have learned the can stop its spread. Knowing what feeds it as well as its natural environmentent. In order to infect its presumptive host, the hosts body needs to be between pH 6.0 to pH 5.5. Our normal healthy pH is 7.4 to 8.0, but in sickness our p H falls lower where the coronavirus can infect the host. This is the key to prevention and the cure. The cure now is staring you in the face. "Feed the host not the hitchhiker. " and maintain a healthy pH brtween 7.4 and 8.0.
    I think you have it backwards. Normal germs and virus do not live in an acid envoronment. A big glass of orange juice is ACID. Apples are ACID. Drink your orange juice or eat an apple, get the body ACID to fight germs.
  • SLSL
    (This is an answer, or a simple theoretical suggestion to the question how will coronavirus end). I think that a solution can be found. The virus should be attacked from the outside. For instance, heat can destroy it. If so, steam of water can disconnect it from the lungs, as it happens with other viruses. It sounds simple but if the virus bodies connect themselves to the lungs, steam is a way to disconnect them. (So a bucket of hot water and a big towel and inhale-exhale for a few seconds!). It can do the trick. It should be tried. Other things can be tried, like different smells, aromas, fragrances. Something that kills the virus and not the people! Using a vaccine that will release anti-bodies that protect the human body from the inside takes time and is very expensive. So a simpler solution should be sought (and hopefully found).
  • yippy
    @alfie I respectfully disagree. You want to keep your body alkaline. Too much acidity is a haven for diseases.

    Please refer to these articles:
  • Hartmann352
    The coronavirus outbreak, sadly, will end when the print and electronically transmitted media see the coronavirus coverage ratings plummet to such a degree that a new calamity will be needed to supersede it.

    Remember that prescient hit "Dirty Laundry" by Don Henley from the dim dark 80's...

    "I make my living off the evening news
    Just give me something, something I can use
    People love it when you lose
    They love dirty laundry...

    We got the bubble-headed bleached-blondeComes on at five
    She can tell you 'bout the plane crash
    With a gleam in her eye
    It's interesting when people dieGive us dirty laundry."

    The coronavirus is dirty laundry spiced up by the death of sufferers. But soon, the CDC and the President's Coronavirus Task Force, backed by money and Mike Pence, will soon begin to slow this flu-like contagion. Soon it, too, will be history.

    I have my serious doubts about the prognostications of WHO, the World Health Organization.

    From the article 'Stop Funding WHO Until It Cleans Up It's Act' by Jeff Stier dated June 14, 2017, from The National Review:

    "...Global public health is, indeed, critical to American interests at home and abroad, and the U.S. government is the largest contributor to WHO’s approximately $2 billion budget. However, like other U.N. subsidiaries, WHO is plagued by persistent wasteful spending, utter disregard for transparency, pervasive incompetence, and failure to adhere to even basic democratic standards.

    None of these problems are new, but they are worsening, and the latest developments underscore the need for tough love in the form of responsible stewardship of our largesse.

    The May 23 election of Ethiopian politician Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (who will serve until 2022) to head WHO is the latest evidence that reform won’t come from WHO itself. Dr. Tedros, as he likes to be called (he has a Ph.D. in community health), is a leader of Ethiopia’s brutal minority party, the Tigray People’s Liberation Front, a wing of the ruling Marxist-rooted Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front. He served the violently repressive regime as minister of foreign affairs from 2012 to 2016, after a stint as health minister.

    Prior to Tedros’s election, the Associated Press published an exposé on WHO’s already infamously lavish spending on first-class airfare and five-star hotels.
    Prior to Tedros’s election, the Associated Press published an exposé on WHO’s already infamously lavish spending on first-class airfare and five-star hotels.

    The AP obtained documents showing that WHO “routinely has spent about $200 million a year on travel expenses, more than what it doles out to fight some of the biggest problems in public health, including AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria combined.”

    JEFF STIER is a senior fellow at the Consumer Choice Center. He lives in New York City.

    We must remain vigilant in the US and we can thank our lucky stars we have the stellar performers at the CDC, which fights disease and supports communities and citizens to do the same, and at the US Army's USAMRIID, which provides biodefense solutions to protect our nation and citizens.

  • Deputy Connor 1K34
    it's making me mad that the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA hospitals are not testing people and it's getting to out of hand it's killing people and if they think that there is a cure for it apparently not it had killed some of my deputies and my officers and it's not fair to all of us that we have to deal with this we need to try and stop it as much as we can and as soon as possible because it's shutting down schools so i need everyone who wants to try with me to save the world from being dangorous plz reply or like it thank you i am just sad that it killed some of my law enforcement officers and a student and we need the american community who isn't infected to find a cure WHOS WITH ME
  • Deputy Connor 1K34
    and donal trump thinks we don't need to be afraid we do it's killing our community and our people and donald trump is refuseing to not help out our community by trying to help out and find a cure

    P.S thank you all for helping and taking this seriously thank you very much
  • Deputy Connor 1K34
    "Look at the accelerating number of cases. This is out of control in the wildlife populations" this is the quote