This Biologist Cracked a Problem That's Stumped Mathematicians for 68 Years
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Delivered Daily
Daily Newsletter
Sign up for the latest discoveries, groundbreaking research and fascinating breakthroughs that impact you and the wider world direct to your inbox.
Once a week
Life's Little Mysteries
Feed your curiosity with an exclusive mystery every week, solved with science and delivered direct to your inbox before it's seen anywhere else.
Once a week
How It Works
Sign up to our free science & technology newsletter for your weekly fix of fascinating articles, quick quizzes, amazing images, and more
Delivered daily
Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
Once a month
Watch This Space
Sign up to our monthly entertainment newsletter to keep up with all our coverage of the latest sci-fi and space movies, tv shows, games and books.
Once a week
Night Sky This Week
Discover this week's must-see night sky events, moon phases, and stunning astrophotos. Sign up for our skywatching newsletter and explore the universe with us!
Join the club
Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.
An amateur mathematician just partially solved a problem that has vexed mathematicians since 1950.
Aubrey de Grey — a biologist better known for trying to radically extend human life and for predicting that the first person to live to be 1,000 years old has already been born — has published a paper on the preprint server arXiv that narrows down the answer to the 68-year-old Hadwiger-Nelson problem. Mathematicians had known for years that the answer to this question (which we'll get to in a second) was either 4, 5, 6 or 7. De Grey, in his paper, showed that it definitely isn't 4. That leaves just 5, 6 or 7. [The 9 Most Massive Numbers in Existence]
Now that you have de Grey's answer, here's the question:
Take a canvas and draw a bunch of points (called vertices) on it. If any points are a distance 1 unit apart from each other, draw a line between them. Mathematicians don't care if the "unit" is an inch or a mile. It doesn't matter, as long as it's the same between all connected vertices. (Those lines connecting the points are called "edges.") Mathematicians call this a unit distance graph. What you end up with will look something like this:
Now it's time to go to the store and buy paint to color in all the points.
Now ask yourself: What's the minimum number of paint colors I need to color in any graph in a way that no two points that share an edge are the same color?
It's easy to come up with a unit distance graph that can't be colored with just three colors. Here's a good example:
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
But coming up with a unit distance graph that can't be colored in with four colors is a lot more difficult. Computers can't do it on their own. No full-time mathematicians managed it for 68 years, until de Grey came up with this monstrosity:
De Grey's graph has 1,581 vertices on it. And they're arranged in such a way that you couldn't paint it just right with four colors of paint. At least five are necessary to make it work.
But that doesn't mean five is the absolute minimum. Mathematicians know that it's possible that a graph will come along requiring six colors of paint, or even seven. (Back in 1950, the mathematician John Isbell came up with a strategy involving seven colors for solving any graph.)
The absolute minimum needed is still a mystery. But thanks to de Grey, we know it's more than four.
Original article on Live Science.

