Ghostly 'Death Assemblages' Tell Tales of Past
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Delivered Daily
Daily Newsletter
Sign up for the latest discoveries, groundbreaking research and fascinating breakthroughs that impact you and the wider world direct to your inbox.
Once a week
Life's Little Mysteries
Feed your curiosity with an exclusive mystery every week, solved with science and delivered direct to your inbox before it's seen anywhere else.
Once a week
How It Works
Sign up to our free science & technology newsletter for your weekly fix of fascinating articles, quick quizzes, amazing images, and more
Delivered daily
Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
Once a month
Watch This Space
Sign up to our monthly entertainment newsletter to keep up with all our coverage of the latest sci-fi and space movies, tv shows, games and books.
Once a week
Night Sky This Week
Discover this week's must-see night sky events, moon phases, and stunning astrophotos. Sign up for our skywatching newsletter and explore the universe with us!
Join the club
Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.
The bleached animal skull, that icon of the Old West, could be a key to understanding how animal populations change. A new study suggests that bones of animals that died in recent decades match actual populations stretching back as much as a century.
Surveying these bones could be more useful than counting live animals when it comes to reconstructing old ecosystems, researchers reported March 28 in the open-access journal PLoS ONE.
"The skeletons of long-dead animals lying on landscapes provide critical insights into our understanding of ecosystem history," biologist Joshua Miller of Wright State University in Ohio said in a statement released by the National Science Foundation, which funded the research.
Researchers are accustomed to looking to the fossil record to reconstruct times gone by. Similarly, newer, unfossilized bones could give a glimpse into more recent history — as long as you are sure that the bones are a faithful record of the animals that died in an area, Miller wrote in PLoS ONE. [Read: Yellowstone Wolves Reintroduce 'Ecology of Fear']
Some bones might be preserved more readily than others, or they might not be preserved well enough for accurate age estimates.
Yellowstone was an ideal place to test the idea, Miller wrote, because wildlife surveys there have been very thorough. Over three years, he and his colleagues combed through the park, which predominantly lies in northwest Wyoming, counting bones and body remnants of large grazing animals, including bison, elk and moose. They surveyed along 40 narrow strips of grassland, forest, marsh and river and lakefront land, each 1 kilometer long and 30 to 100 meters wide (0.6 miles by 98 to 328 feet). They then compared their counts with recent aerial counts of Yellowstone's wildlife and with historical surveys.
Miller found that the counts didn't quite match up with modern numbers. But when he used weathering and radiocarbon dating to estimate a time of death for the animals found, the numbers matched perfectly with historical data.
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
"Elk, for example, were much more abundant in the 1990s than they are today," Miller said. "The bones of Yellowstone feature far more elk than one would predict based on the current Yellowstone community."
Horses were prevalent in the park in the late 1880s and early 1900s, before cars replaced them as transportation; weathered horse bones are still found in the park. By contrast, mountain goats showed up in the park in only the last 20 years; their skeletal record is almost invisible because relatively few have died so far.
Yellowstone has been a well-studied area, Miller said, so the bone surveys didn't provide much new information about its history. The next goal, he said, is to take the technique elsewhere.
"Now we can go the next step and use bone accumulations in regions we have only recently begun studying to obtain critical historical data, and establish how ecosystems have changed over the last decades, century or even longer," Miller said.
You can follow LiveScience senior writer Stephanie Pappas on Twitter @sipappas.

Stephanie Pappas is a contributing writer for Live Science, covering topics ranging from geoscience to archaeology to the human brain and behavior. She was previously a senior writer for Live Science but is now a freelancer based in Denver, Colorado, and regularly contributes to Scientific American and The Monitor, the monthly magazine of the American Psychological Association. Stephanie received a bachelor's degree in psychology from the University of South Carolina and a graduate certificate in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz.
