A fetus at 4 months seen via sonogram.
For most women today, it's hard to imagine going through a pregnancy without having an ultrasound. But these iconic black-and-white images of a developing fetus, generated by the reflection of high frequency sound waves, have only been around since the mid-1950s.
A new book explores the history of ultrasounds, in both their technical and social dimensions. In "Imaging and Imagining the Fetus: The Development of Obstetric Ultrasound" (The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013), authors Malcolm Nicolson, a history of medicine professor at the University of Glasgow in Scotland, and engineer John Fleming look at how ultrasounds came into wide use, and why their images lie at the crossroads of several hotly debated issues today.
When it was invented?
Ultrasound was first used for clinical purposes in 1956 in Glasgow. Obstetrician Ian Donald and engineer Tom Brown developed the first prototype systems based on an instrument used to detect industrial flaws in ships.
They perfected its clinical use, and by the end of the 1950s, ultrasound was routinely used in Glasgow hospitals, Nicolson said. But it didn’t really take off in British hospitals until the 1970s, and it was well into the 1970s before it became widely used in American hospitals, he said. [Blossoming Body: 8 Odd Changes That Happen During Pregnancy]
By the end of the 20th century, ultrasound imaging had become routine in maternity clinics throughout the developed world. The technology has undergone extensive development over the past 20 years, Nicolson told LiveScience, but "has probably reached more or less the pinnacle of its acuity."
How does it work?
Ultrasound imaging involves bouncing "ultrasonic" sound waves — above the audible range of human hearing — at body structures or tissues, and detecting the echoes that bounce back.
Obstetric ultrasonography is used to image a human fetus inside its mother's womb. It's used to confirm a pregnancy, to identify the sex and number of fetuses and to detect fetal abnormalities such as microcephaly (an abnormally small head), absence of kidneys, and spinal problems.
During a scan, ultrasound waves are aimed at a pregnant women's abdomen. Based on the angle of the beam, and the time it takes for echoes to return, an image of body structures inside the fetus can be generated.
Early in the use of fetal ultrasound, clinicians could only detect the baby's head, Nicolson said. "But gradually, with developing expertise, they could discern fine structures in the fetus," he said.
Is it safe?
One of the main advantages of ultrasound is that it's noninvasive. The procedure has been safely performed on millions of pregnant women. Concerns about its safety have periodically surfaced, but Nicolson said he thinks these stem more from anxiety over the role of technology in pregnancy than from evidence of harm.
"We can be confident that at the levels currently used for clinical investigation, ultrasound is safe. No pattern of damage has been found," Nicolson said.
However, at high power, ultrasound waves are able to damage human tissue. Researchers don't know exactly at what level this occurs, Nicolson said, adding that testing the threshold at which it becomes dangerous in humans would be unethical.
He said that ultrasound scans should only be done for clinically justified reasons. For example, so-called "bonding scans," images taken purely for commemorative purposes, unnecessarily expose a fetus to the high-energy sound waves, Nicolson said.
What's the emotional impact?
Ultrasound has enjoyed an enthusiastic reception by pregnant women. In addition to revealing the baby's health, the images themselves provide a keepsake. "Overwhelmingly, pregnant women expect to be scanned, and are moved and excited by seeing the fetus," Nicolson said — especially if the baby moves. In fact, Nicolson said, some women report not feeling pregnant until they've seen the ultrasound image.
Seeing a developing fetus has a humanizing effect, too. Donald, the physician who helped develop the technology, was a devout High Anglican, and knew the images carried moral significance for women contemplating having an abortion.
Are there social implications?
Ultrasound images sometimes play a role in decisions to maintain or terminate a pregnancy. Anti-abortion proponents take ultrasound images as proof that a fetus is fully alive and therefore should not be aborted.
On the other hand, ultrasound can be used to diagnose potentially fatal or debilitating abnormalities in the fetus, which can encourage termination of the pregnancy.
In some East Asian countries, ultrasound is used to detect the sex of the baby expressly so that a fetus of less desirable sex (usually female) can be aborted, Nicolson said. He called the practice "unfortunate and worrying."
Still, anecdotal evidence suggests that if pregnant women see images of a fetus — especially their own — they are less likely to terminate a pregnancy, Nicolson said.
"The realm of human reproduction is an area that is contested, and bound to be emotive," Nicolson said.