Gulf Stream current could collapse in 2025, plunging Earth into climate chaos: 'We were actually bewildered'

A view of hurricanes forming over the Atlantic Ocean, created by assembling images acquired on Sept. 6, 2017 by NASA's Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) satellite.
A view of hurricanes forming over the Atlantic Ocean, created by assembling images acquired on Sept. 6, 2017 by NASA's Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) satellite. (Image credit: NASA/Joshua Stevens)

A vital ocean current system that helps regulate the Northern Hemisphere's climate could collapse anytime from 2025 and unleash climate chaos, a controversial new study warns. 

The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), which includes the Gulf Stream, governs the climate by bringing warm, tropical waters north and cold water south.

But researchers now say the AMOC may be veering toward total breakdown between 2025 and 2095, causing temperatures to plummet, ocean ecosystems to collapse and storms to proliferate around the world. However, some scientists have cautioned that the new research comes with some big caveats.

The AMOC can exist in two stable states: a stronger, faster one that we rely upon today, and another that is much slower and weaker. Previous estimates predicted that the current would probably switch to its weaker mode sometime in the next century

Related: Gulf Stream could be veering toward irreversible collapse, a new analysis warns

But human-caused climate change may push the AMOC to a critical tipping point sooner rather than later, researchers predicted in a new study published Tuesday (July 25) in the journal Nature Communications

"The expected tipping point — given that we continue business as usual with greenhouse gas emissions — is much earlier than we expected," co-author Susanne Ditlevsen, a professor of statistics and stochastic models in biology at the University of Copenhagen, told Live Science. 

"It was not a result where we said: 'Oh, yeah, here we have it'. We were actually bewildered."

AMOC as a global conveyor belt 

Atlantic Ocean currents work like an endless global conveyor belt moving oxygen, nutrients, carbon and heat around the globe. Warmer southerly waters, which are saltier and denser, flow north to cool and sink below waters at higher latitudes, releasing heat into the atmosphere. 

Then, once it has sunk beneath the ocean, the water slowly drifts southward, heats up again, and the cycle repeats. But climate change is slowing this flow. Fresh water from melting ice sheets has made the water less dense and salty, and recent studies have shown that the current is at its weakest in more than 1,000 years. 

A simplified animation of the global AMOC "conveyor belt", with surface currents shown in red and deep sea ones in blue.

A simplified animation of the global AMOC "conveyor belt," with surface currents shown in red and deep sea currents in blue. (Image credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Scientific Visualization Studio)

The region near Greenland where the southerly waters sink (known as the North Atlantic subpolar gyre) borders a patch that is hitting record low temperatures, while the surrounding seas climb to all-time highs, forming an ever-expanding 'blob' of cold water.

The last time the AMOC switched modes during the most recent ice age, the climate near Greenland increased by 18 to 27 degrees Fahrenheit (10 to 15 degrees Celsius) within a decade. If it were to turn off, temperatures in Europe and North America could drop by as much as 9 F (5 C) in the same amount of time.

Direct data on the AMOC's strength has only been recorded since 2004, so to analyze changes to the current over longer timescales, the researchers turned to surface temperature readings of the subpolar gyre between the years of 1870 and 2020, a system which they argue provides a 'fingerprint' for the strength of AMOC’s circulation. 

By feeding this information into a statistical model, the researchers gauged the diminishing strength and resilience of the ocean current by its growing year-on-year fluctuations. 

The model's results alarmed the researchers — yet they say that checking them only reinforced their findings: The window for the system's collapse could begin as early as 2025, and it grows more likely as the 21st century continues. 

"I don't consider myself very alarmist. In some sense it's not fruitful," Peter Ditlevsen, a professor of physics and climate science at the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen, told Live Science. "So my result annoys me, in some sense. Because it [the window for possible collapse] is so close and so significant that we have to take immediate action now."

Rough seas in the Southern Atlantic Ocean.

Rough seas in the Southern Atlantic Ocean. (Image credit: Getty Images)

Controversy over the predicted collapse

Oceanographers and climate experts have said that while the study provides a worrying warning, it comes with some big uncertainties. 

"If the statistics are robust and are a correct/relevant way to describe how the actual modern AMOC behaves, and the changes relate (solely) to changes in the AMOC, then this is a very concerning result," David Thornalley, a professor of ocean and climate science at University College London, told Live Science. "But there are some really big unknowns and assumptions that need investigating before we have confidence in this result." 

Other climate scientists have gone so far as to pour cold water on the findings, suggesting it is "wholly unclear" that observed surface temperature evolution of AMOC can be linked to the strength of its circulation. 

"While the mathematics seem expertly done, the physical foundation is extremely shaky: It rests on the assumption that the collapse shown by simplified models correctly describes reality — but we simply do not know, and there is no serious discussion of these simplified models' shortcomings,'' Jochem Marotzke, a professor of climate science and the director of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg, told Live Science. "Hence, while the paper might be a valid 'what if' exercise in time series analysis in a specialized journal, it falls way short of its self-proclaimed goal of estimating the evolution of the circulation solely from observations."

The researchers behind the new study say their next steps will be to update their model with data from the last three years, which should narrow their window for predicted collapse. 

Ben Turner
Staff Writer

Ben Turner is a U.K. based staff writer at Live Science. He covers physics and astronomy, among other topics like tech and climate change. He graduated from University College London with a degree in particle physics before training as a journalist. When he's not writing, Ben enjoys reading literature, playing the guitar and embarrassing himself with chess.

  • CG On Science
    admin said:
    Researchers have predicted the collapse of the AMOC could happen any time between 2025 and 2095 — far sooner than previous predictions, although not all scientists are convinced.

    Gulf Stream current could collapse in 2025, plunging Earth into climate chaos: 'We were actually bewildered' : Read more
    Gulf Stream current could collapse in 2025, plunging Earth into climate chaos: 'We were actually bewildered'
    "Gulf Stream current could collapse in 2025, plunging Earth into climate chaos: 'We were actually bewildered'
    Researchers have predicted the collapse of the AMOC could happen any time between 2025 and 2095."

    Seriously!?

    PLEASE! Note the word 'could', and also the phrase "any time between 2025 and 2095"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    "any time between 2025 and 2095" is an immense difference. When you add the word 'could happen', that's equivalent to saying 'anytime over the next 1,000 years. Please, don't promote global warming climate change when you have ZERO awareness of the reality. You're actually worse that those purportedly anti-science anti-climate change people you're so fond of condemning.
    Reply
  • BenitaZ6i
    Please - y'all are going to scare the people. As some are prone to freaking out first and thinking about it later, that is going to contribute to people throwing cans of food on irreplaceable artwork and sitting on roadways, neither of which are truly useful in making people stop using fossil fuels. Personally, this nonsense makes me want to keep my 4WD truck just that much more. I am not the only person who feels this way either.

    How do they think we get the electricity to power EVs? Wind farms and solar panels contribute less than 10% of the energy needed to run our way of life. In addition, neither the turbines or the panels are dependable at this point in time.

    I suggest we all give it a couple (at least!) of decades and when our technology catches up with your dreams, try again on the EVs, which at this point in time, are deathtraps. Besides, with $12,000+ batteries, they are not practical.

    Again, please leave off the climate alarmism. There is no need to scare people!
    Reply
  • Sparky
    admin said:
    Researchers have predicted the collapse of the AMOC could happen any time between 2025 and 2095 — far sooner than previous predictions, although not all scientists are convinced.

    Gulf Stream current could collapse in 2025, plunging Earth into climate chaos: 'We were actually bewildered' : Read more
    This is nothing more than fearmongering at its best. They love to use trigger words like could, might, can, possibly but yet nothing definitive. This article is aimed at low information people who will eat this up thinking they will be dead within 2 to 70 years from now. All this article is really achieving is making a mockery of science.
    Reply
  • erock7205
    I'm gonna go back a few years probably awhile before you were born. One of your party's favorite people. Al Gore predicted that by now, you would be dead frozen in a block of ice. Our country spent billions of dollars, the world spent billions of dollars trying to make sure The ice age wouldn't strike. Well, good job, you idiots did such a wonderful job, that now we have global warming. And now you're gonna use ridiculous predictions like this to waste more money, why doesn't somebody complain about all the starving people on the planet. If you start using money doing that instead of stupid predictions like this to scare people, maybe your empathy would show and your true care for human mankind would show. Your ability to market fear for the growth of your global world order is disgusting and I notice you don't have any awards because you don't deserve any.
    Reply
  • Hartmann352
    erock7205 said:
    I'm gonna go back a few years probably awhile before you were born. One of your party's favorite people. Al Gore predicted that by now, you would be dead frozen in a block of ice. Our country spent billions of dollars, the world spent billions of dollars trying to make sure The ice age wouldn't strike. Well, good job, you idiots did such a wonderful job, that now we have global warming. And now you're gonna use ridiculous predictions like this to waste more money, why doesn't somebody complain about all the starving people on the planet. If you start using money doing that instead of stupid predictions like this to scare people, maybe your empathy would show and your true care for human mankind would show. Your ability to market fear for the growth of your global world order is disgusting and I notice you don't have any awards because you don't deserve any.
    Imagine, if you will, a nation whose leadership believes that the taxpayers being ordered to give trillions of dollars to the central government can actually change the weather.
    Hartmann352
    Reply
  • Roj5
    Sparky said:
    This is nothing more than fearmongering at its best. They love to use trigger words like could, might, can, possibly but yet nothing definitive.

    What are you expecting exactly? An exact time like 3:46 on a Thursday afternoon in March 2037?
    Reply
  • smitz327
    OMG here we go again, doom and gloom! Must be looking for money
    Reply
  • Bruzote
    erock7205 said:
    I'm gonna go back a few years probably awhile before you were born. One of your party's favorite people. Al Gore predicted that by now, you would be dead frozen in a block of ice. Our country spent billions of dollars, the world spent billions of dollars trying to make sure The ice age wouldn't strike. Well, good job, you idiots did such a wonderful job, that now we have global warming. And now you're gonna use ridiculous predictions like this to waste more money, why doesn't somebody complain about all the starving people on the planet. If you start using money doing that instead of stupid predictions like this to scare people, maybe your empathy would show and your true care for human mankind would show. Your ability to market fear for the growth of your global world order is disgusting and I notice you don't have any awards because you don't deserve any.
    He did not say that. Keep lying, though, since your idea of an optimal society is clearly one where idiots blather on about their darker fantasies.
    Reply
  • PodCastAllLangs
    Bruzote said:
    He did not say that. Keep lying, though, since your idea of an optimal society is clearly one where idiots blather on about their darker fantasies.
    Seems to me some people looking for TrumpSocial spelled it LiveScience into their browser. 🤷‍♂️
    The article suggests temps could "plunge" 5°C, which is like the difference between November & December. But the critical effects would be to our entire ecosystem, much of which is much more vulnerable than we are. But that would naturally affect us too. It's slight, but still critical, which is what many of these articles try to convey.
    Reply
  • Hartmann352
    January 22, 2023

    Noted climate activist and former Vice President Al Gore, who made headlines this week after he claimed global warming was "boiling the oceans," has a history of making climate-related proclamations later proven to be false, all with an attempt to fill his wallet.

    During remarks made Wednesday at the World Economic Forum summit in Davos, Switzerland, Gore warned that continued carbon emissions into the atmosphere would destroy the planet and lead to widespread calamities.

    "We’re still putting 162 million tons into it every single day and the accumulated amount is now trapping as much extra heat as would be released by 600,000 Hiroshima-class atomic bombs exploding every single day on the earth," Gore said. "That’s what’s boiling the oceans, creating these atmospheric rivers, and the rain bombs, and sucking the moisture out of the land, and creating the droughts and downpours, and melting the ice and raising the sea level, and causing these tsunami waves of climate refugees." All as opposed to vast amounts of governmental largesse heaped on the immigrant population and lax border policies.

    Gore then noted a prediction that the number of climate refugees worldwide would surge to ten billion within the century. He added that such a surge would lead to nations losing their "capacity for self-governance and the death of world-wide economic systems..." While Gore has been provided large platforms, giving speeches at the World Economic Forum, United Nations conferences, the White House and Congress and other high-profile events, many of his past statements have been disproven and being located in the lunatic fringe.

    Gore didn’t make the prediction that the poles would be "ice free by 2013" himself but was citing the findings from a climate researcher. He did, however, misrepresent the available data to fit his alarmist trope.

    “These figures are fresh,” Gore hollered into a microphone on Dec. 14, 2009, as he stood beet red while noisily shaking the podium during the COP15 climate change conference in Copenhagen.

    Hartmann352
    Reply