See the 'amazing' facial reconstruction of a Bronze Age woman discovered crouching in a 4,200-year-old grave

GIF of facial reconstruction process at the Kilmartin Museum.
The reconstruction of Upper Largie woman from Scotland was made with a 3D printed skull and layered plasticine clay. (Image credit: Oscar Nilsson)

More than 4,000 years ago, a young woman who died in what is now Scotland was buried in a crouched position within a stone-lined grave. She remained buried for millennia, until excavators at a stone quarry unexpectedly unearthed her bones in 1997.

Little is known about the woman — dubbed Upper Largie Woman after the Upper Largie Quarry — but now, a new bust-like reconstruction reveals how she may have looked during the Early Bronze Age.

The reconstruction, which went on display Sept. 3 at the Kilmartin Museum in Scotland, shows a young woman with dark braided hair who is wearing a deer-skin outfit. And she appears to be looking at someone nearby.

"Making a reconstruction I usually think that we are looking into their world, [meaning] they don't see us," Oscar Nilsson, a forensic artist based in Sweden who crafted the woman's likeness, told Live Science in an email. "I thought it could be an interesting idea to twist this a bit, and actually thinking that she can see us. And as you can see, she looks a bit critical to us (I don't blame her for that...)!"

Related: 35 amazing facial reconstructions, from Stone Age shamans to King Tut

Upper Largie woman, who died in her 20s, lived during the early Bronze Age of Scotland. (Image credit: Oscar Nilsson)

After the discovery of Upper Largie Woman, a skeletal and dental analysis revealed that she likely died in her 20s and experienced periods of illness or malnutrition. Radiocarbon dating found that she lived between 1500 B.C. and 2200 B.C., during the Early Bronze Age, according to the museum. Meanwhile, a look at different isotopes, or versions of strontium and oxygen from her remains suggested that she grew up locally in Scotland, but the team wasn't able to extract her DNA, so her ethnic heritage, including her skin, eye and hair color, is unknown.

However, archaeologists found sherds of Beaker pottery in her grave, hinting that she was part of the Beaker culture, named for its peoples' bell-shaped beakers. Research suggests that the Beaker culture started in Central Europe with people whose ancestors came from the Eurasian Steppe. Eventually, the Beaker culture reached Britain in about 2400 B.C. DNA evidence indicates that the Beaker culture replaced most of Britain's inhabitants, including the Neolithic communities that had built monuments such as Stonehenge.

"The carbon dating suggests she might be a descendant of the first Beaker newcomers," Sharon Webb, director and curator of Kilmartin Museum, told Live Science in an email.

For the reconstruction of Upper Largie Woman, her skull was CT (computed tomography) scanned and then 3D printed in Scotland. However, "she lacked her mandible [lower jaw], and her left side of the cranium was in a quite fragmented condition," Nilsson said. "So, the first thing I had to do was to rebuild the left side of her cranium. And then to create a mandible, a rather speculative issue of course."

Then, Nilsson took her age, sex, weight and ethnicity into account, as these factors help determine tissue thickness. "So, in this case: a woman, about 20-30 years of age, signs of undernourishment in a period of her life, and a probable origin from the region," he said.

Nilsson pulled from a chart of modern individuals who fit these characteristics, then used their tissue measurements to begin sculpting the reconstruction. Pegs placed on the replica skull helped him measure the tissue depth, which he then covered with plasticine clay as he molded the facial muscles. Based on her skull's contours, he noted that Upper Largie Woman's eyes were wide set and that her nose was broad and "probably a bit turned upwards." She also had a rounded forehead and a broad mouth.

"I found it interesting that once she was reconstructed, I did not see that much of her malnutrition," Nilsson said. "She had a very rounded facial skeleton, which helped her looking a bit more healthy than she may have been."

However, he was clear that "the colors were all qualified guesses, based on other burials from the time and the region, where the DNA was in better shape than this one."

Webb called the reconstruction "absolutely amazing, we wanted her expression to be asking questions of the visitor, wondering who they are, and what their lives were like so that visitors might also ponder her life."

Upper Largie Woman's remains are now "sensitively 'reburied'" in the same position and orientation she was likely buried in 4,000 years ago, Webb said. Visitors can see her reconstruction at the museum's permanent exhibit.

Laura Geggel
Editor

Laura is the archaeology and Life's Little Mysteries editor at Live Science. She also reports on general science, including paleontology. Her work has appeared in The New York Times, Scholastic, Popular Science and Spectrum, a site on autism research. She has won multiple awards from the Society of Professional Journalists and the Washington Newspaper Publishers Association for her reporting at a weekly newspaper near Seattle. Laura holds a bachelor's degree in English literature and psychology from Washington University in St. Louis and a master's degree in science writing from NYU.

  • Herc
    "I thought it could be an interesting idea to twist this a bit, and actually thinking that she can see us. And as you can see, she looks a bit critical to us (I don't blame her for that...)!"

    Yep, just gotta insert politics into science.
    Reply
  • firestorm117
    Herc said:
    "I thought it could be an interesting idea to twist this a bit, and actually thinking that she can see us. And as you can see, she looks a bit critical to us (I don't blame her for that...)!"

    Yep, just gotta insert politics into science
    Was pretty political when they took the remains of a ancient Scottish woman, an area closer to the arctic circle, where the sun doesn't rise on the winter solstice, than most of non-nordic Europe, and made her black. From a time before such migration would have occurred and before most European civilizations had any contact with the Mediterranean, and the people would have naturally had fair skin due to the lower sunlight intensity.

    Like this is the stuff that fuels the white supremacist fear mongering about white replacement.
    Reply
  • bobmcbobman
    What brazen racism from this article and the artist who reconstructed the skull.

    Yet more blackwashing of European history and people's by journalists and historians claing objectivity, but being no more than political activists.

    "but the team wasn't able to extract her DNA, so her ethnic heritage, including her skin, eye and hair color, is unknown."

    So they decide to blackwash her...Because that's the fashion and current politics: re-write history and create a fake history of a black Europe to justify current political and aims.

    Would they take a 4000 year old Skull from China and make them blond haired and white? Or a 4000 year old skull from Australia and make them look Arab?

    No: because that would be racist and race-washing a people's history. But blackwashing European history and people's is OK because that's what they wish for the future.
    Reply
  • stumped
    So disappointed to read what was done here. Wasted work, talent & time spent to produce a fantasy work. Why?
    Reply
  • dr_cate89
    This reconstruction flies in the face of what is known about the Beaker folk. The Bell Beaker folk actually altered the face of Britain. Prior to the BB migration, Britains had deep olive skin and brown eyes. As much as 90% of that original group's DNA was superceded by that of the Bell Beaker folk. The later Beaker migration from central Europe carried Steppe herder ancestry and those of the Steppes were actally lighter skinned with brown hair and either blue or brown eyes.
    Reply
  • DuhHickey
    So we can tell if someone was male or female just from looking at their bones? Does the media know this? Where did white people come from? Apparently no where on Earth.
    Reply
  • Shrike
    firestorm117 said:
    Like this is the stuff that fuels the white supremacist fear mongering about white replacement.
    Being a bit of a drama queen aren't you?
    Reply
  • Nicole123
    DuhHickey said:
    So we can tell if someone was male or female just from looking at their bones? Does the media know this? Where did white people come from? Apparently no where on Earth.
    "White" skin is simply a mutation from lack of melanin. According to the bible, the first instance is from the story of Esau. Otherwise, historically, all peoples are descendants of Africa. So, if you are "white", you are a mutant! If so, welcome to the club :-)
    Reply
  • Nicole123
    bobmcbobman said:
    What brazen racism from this article and the artist who reconstructed the skull.

    Yet more blackwashing of European history and people's by journalists and historians claing objectivity, but being no more than political activists.

    "but the team wasn't able to extract her DNA, so her ethnic heritage, including her skin, eye and hair color, is unknown."

    So they decide to blackwash her...Because that's the fashion and current politics: re-write history and create a fake history of a black Europe to justify current political and aims.

    Would they take a 4000 year old Skull from China and make them blond haired and white? Or a 4000 year old skull from Australia and make them look Arab?

    No: because that would be racist and race-washing a people's history. But blackwashing European history and people's is OK because that's what they wish for the future.
    If you would have kept reading, the article also states: "However, he was clear that "the colors were all qualified guesses, based on other burials from the time and the region, where the DNA was in better shape than this one." No one is intentionally "blackwashing" lol.
    Reply
  • Madeline_Mardigan
    firestorm117 said:
    Was pretty political when they took the remains of a ancient Scottish woman, an area closer to the arctic circle, where the sun doesn't rise on the winter solstice, than most of non-nordic Europe, and made her black. From a time before such migration would have occurred and before most European civilizations had any contact with the Mediterranean, and the people would have naturally had fair skin due to the lower sunlight intensity.

    Like this is the stuff that fuels the white supremacist fear mongering about white replacement.
    Sweden has lied about artifacts before by claiming that Islam was always part of Sweden and it's history. Oh course it was debunked immediately. It's not surprising that they would lie again. And if to don't think that there is such a thing as the replacement theory then you must have your head up your butt. Even the leftists know it and applaud it. So it's not a. White supremacy thing. Stop that narrative now.
    Reply