Humans faced a 'close call with extinction' nearly a million years ago

The image depicts a cliff painting, illustrating the population of human ancestor pull together to survive the unknown danger in the darkness during the ancient severe bottleneck.
Rock art on a cliff illustrates how our human ancestors survived in the face of unknown danger. Next to it is the core forumula used by researchers to infer the bottleneck that occured close to 1 million years ago. (Image credit: Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, CAS)

Humans might have almost gone extinct nearly 1 million years ago, with the world population hovering at only about 1,300 for more than 100,000 years, a new study finds.

This close call with extinction may have played a major role in the evolution of modern humans and their closest known extinct relatives, the thick-browed Neanderthals and the mysterious Denisovans, researchers added.

Previous research suggested that modern humans originated about 300,000 years ago in Africa. With so few fossils from around that time, much remains uncertain about how the human lineage evolved before modern humans emerged.

To learn more about the period near the evolution of modern humans, scientists investigated the genomes of more than 3,150 present-day modern humans from 10 African populations and 40 non-African ones. They developed a new analytical tool to deduce the size of the group making up the ancestors of modern humans by looking at the diversity of the genetic sequences seen in their descendants.

The genetic data suggest that between 813,000 and 930,00 years ago, the ancestors of modern humans experienced a severe "bottleneck," losing about 98.7% of its breeding population. 

Related: Human and ape ancestors arose in Europe, not in Africa, controversial study claims

"Our ancestors experienced such a severe population bottleneck for a really long time that they faced a high risk of extinction," study co-lead author Wangjie Hu at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York City, told Live Science.

The researchers estimated the modern human breeding population numbered about 1,280 for about 117,000 years.

"The estimated population size for our ancestral lineage is tiny, and certainly would have brought them near to extinction," Chris Stringer, a paleoanthropologist at the Natural History Museum in London who was not involved in the new study, told Live Science.

The scientists noted this population crash coincided with severe cooling that resulted in the emergence of glaciers, a drop in ocean surface temperatures, and perhaps long droughts in Africa and Eurasia. Scientists still don't know how this climate change might have affected humans because human fossils and artifacts are relatively sparse during this time, perhaps because the population was so low.

This chart shows the timeline of the severe bottleneck and how many individuals likely existed during that time. (Image credit: Image by Science)

Previous research suggested that the last common ancestor shared by modern humans, Neanderthals and Denisovans lived about 765,000 to 550,000 years ago, about the same time as the newfound bottleneck. This suggests the near-eradication was potentially in some way linked to the evolution of the last common ancestor of modern humans, Neanderthals and Denisovans.

If this last common ancestor lived during or soon after the bottleneck, the bottleneck may have played a role in splitting ancient human groups into modern humans, Neanderthals and Denisovans, Stringer explained. For instance, it might have split humans into tiny separate groups, and over time, differences between these groups would prove significant enough to divide these survivors into distinct populations — modern humans, Neanderthals and Denisovans, he said.

In addition, prior work suggested that about 900,000 to 740,000 years ago, two ancient chromosomes fused to form what is currently known as chromosome 2 in modern humans. Since this coincides with the bottleneck, these new findings suggest the near-eradication of humans may have some link with this major change in the human genome, the researchers noted.

"Since Neanderthals and Denisovans share this fusion with us, it must have occurred before our lineages split from each other," Stringer said.

Future research may apply this new analytical technique "to other genomic data, such as that of Neanderthals and Denisovans," Stringer said. This might reveal whether they similarly underwent major bottlenecks.

The study was published online Thursday (Aug. 31) in the Sept. 1 issue of the journal Science.

Charles Q. Choi
Live Science Contributor
Charles Q. Choi is a contributing writer for Live Science and Space.com. He covers all things human origins and astronomy as well as physics, animals and general science topics. Charles has a Master of Arts degree from the University of Missouri-Columbia, School of Journalism and a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of South Florida. Charles has visited every continent on Earth, drinking rancid yak butter tea in Lhasa, snorkeling with sea lions in the Galapagos and even climbing an iceberg in Antarctica.
  • Don Mendo
    A very interesting info, that humans went to a 1'300 individuals bottleneck in Europe, one million years ago, but population genetics points there was an Y Chromosome Adam, and a mtDNA Eve, in Africa, around 300'000 years ago, the Eve being born 30'000 years after Adam.
    Who are we (or who are them), where do we come from, where do we go?
    Reply
  • Giovani
    admin said:
    The human population may have lingered at about 1,300 for more than 100,000 years, and that population bottleneck could have fueled the divergence between modern humans, Neanderthals and Denisovans.

    Humans faced a 'close call with extinction' nearly a million years ago : Read more
    Fascinating data. The glitch is that humans haven't been around for 900,000 years.
    The insistence of proving humankind evolved as Neanderthal and others did goes on and on without pause, even though it has not been universally accepted or proven beyond a doubt.
    That's because we didn't evolve naturally and this throws a wrench into the machinations of those who insist it's true.
    Examine closely the evidence and find a fallible aspect interjected in hopes of the holy grail being realized. Try again.
    Reply
  • CDKaracter
    So, Mr. Author, answer me this- there's no intermediate species between either neanderthals or denisovans & humans, correct?
    Yes, we did some interbreeding with both species, but where did we come from, to do that interbreeding?? Modern humans just suddenly appear in the fossil record around 4-500,000 years ago, looking like absolutely nothing that had come before. In fact, there is not a single human bone in the so-called "pre-human fossil record," & the significant change from the hominins & us would have required not just a missing link, but a missing link with 50 cousins & 5 million years on either side of him in order to explain our existence through the gradual, small changes made through evolution, & many changes like the fusing of our second & third base pairs of DNA that almost certainly could never have happened at all, not in a billion years, as many DNA experts will admit if cornered.
    So where did we come from, & why are you referring to these hominins ancestors as "humans," when they most definitely are not?
    I'm sorry to throw reality in your face, but why on earth do you operate by basing a great deal of your thinking on that which you already know not to be true.
    And BTW- no, I'm not a creationist, & now that I think about it, I'll bet that much of the reason you don't want to admit that you don't know certain things about where humans came from is that you don't want to give any ammunition to the creationists, but that is not a good reason to live a total, blatant lie.
    Reply
  • sci-fi-lie
    why are you referring to these hominins ancestors as "humans,"
    Unless I've stumbled across false implications, Homo genus == "human" while "modern human" == Homo sapiens.
    I don't see any contradictions here. Creationism isn't even considered because it isn't science. See any # of popular science writers for why, I believe including Carl Sagan and Stephen Jay Gould.
    Reply
  • Giovani
    CDKaracter said:
    So, Mr. Author, answer me this- there's no intermediate species between either neanderthals or denisovans & humans, correct?
    Yes, we did some interbreeding with both species, but where did we come from, to do that interbreeding?? Modern humans just suddenly appear in the fossil record around 4-500,000 years ago, looking like absolutely nothing that had come before. In fact, there is not a single human bone in the so-called "pre-human fossil record," & the significant change from the hominins & us would have required not just a missing link, but a missing link with 50 cousins & 5 million years on either side of him in order to explain our existence through the gradual, small changes made through evolution, & many changes like the fusing of our second & third base pairs of DNA that almost certainly could never have happened at all, not in a billion years, as many DNA experts will admit if cornered.
    So where did we come from, & why are you referring to these hominins ancestors as "humans," when they most definitely are not?
    I'm sorry to throw reality in your face, but why on earth do you operate by basing a great deal of your thinking on that which you already know not to be true.
    And BTW- no, I'm not a creationist, & now that I think about it, I'll bet that much of the reason you don't want to admit that you don't know certain things about where humans came from is that you don't want to give any ammunition to the creationists, but that is not a good reason to live a total, blatant lie.
    While I think your comments are a bit harsh, there is an agreement overall. I don't consider the human line to be over 85,000 years old.
    And yes, we just showed up, not by evolving such as Neanderthal or Denisovans. I'm surprised with the amount of research, which has been enormous concerning this topic, that the obvious hasn't been noted.
    Pounding a square peg into a round hole has been ongoing for a hundred years. Fitting human beings into a naturally occurring evolution has been extraordinarily difficult. The entire quandary is puzzling.
    Reply