A Bloodsucker Goes to Washington: Is this the Chupacabra?


A bizarre beast said to combine the characteristics of a kangaroo, dog, rat and deer was captured last week by workers at Prince George’s Hospital Center in Maryland near Washington, D.C.

Technicians on a smoke break wandered near a wooded area and found the strange, nearly hairless animal. The workers took cellphone videos of the beast, and eventually lured it into a cage with Chinese food as bait. Local news reporters interviewed the hospital workers, who offered a variety of opinions about the beast's identity. "It's a kangaroo, dog, rat mixed," X-ray technician Joe Livermore told the local NBC news. "It's got a rat tail and a head like a deer. I don't know what it is."

The shy animal was dubbed "Prince Chupa" after the mysterious vampire chupacabra, and already some are wondering if the bloodsucker has finally been captured alive. The chupacabra dates back to 1995, when an eyewitness sighted the monster in Puerto Rico. In my book, "Tracking the Chupacabra," I provide evidence showing that the original chupacabra report described a monster in a science fiction film, and most likely no beast ever existed. Since then, no hard evidence of the chupacabra has emerged, and the myth has been kept alive by occasional reports of animals identical to Prince Chupa. So it's not a chupacabra: but what is it?

Many veterinarians and other animal experts are hesitant to offer opinions about mysterious creatures because it can be difficult to identify an animal from just a photo or video. Many animals, especially in the Canidae family (which includes dogs, coyotes, foxes, and wolves), can look very similar and the exact species may only be distinguished by personally examining details such as skull shape, tail length and so on (or DNA analysis). If experts miss a detail in a fuzzy photo or video and get it wrong, they can look foolish. [Rogue Giant Rodent Caught on Camera in California]

That said, we can tell from the video that it's clearly a canid; many suspect a fox. Most people know what a fox looks like — and it's not a kangaroo-dog-rat-deer-looking thing — unless its hair has fallen out because of disease. Prince Chupa probably has a bad case of mange, a parasitic skin infection caused by mites. Because people usually see animals with their full coat of fur, animals with mange can be difficult to identify.

So let's do the math. It's about the size of a fox; foxes live in the area. Prince Chupa's tail looks similar to what you'd see on a hairless fox: long, thin and rat-like. All signs point to it being a fox — although perhaps one with a longer-than-normal tail — with a bad case of mange.

The beast was eventually set free, and unless it is re-captured and subjected to DNA analysis, we may never know exactly what it is.

This story was provided by Life's Little Mysteries, a sister site to LiveScience. Follow Life's Little Mysteries on Twitter @llmysteries, then join us on Facebook.

Benjamin Radford is deputy editor of Skeptical Inquirer science magazine and author of Tracking the Chupacabra: The Vampire Beast in Fact, Fiction, and Folklore. His website is www.BenjaminRadford.com.

Benjamin Radford
Live Science Contributor
Benjamin Radford is the Bad Science columnist for Live Science. He covers pseudoscience, psychology, urban legends and the science behind "unexplained" or mysterious phenomenon. Ben has a master's degree in education and a bachelor's degree in psychology. He is deputy editor of Skeptical Inquirer science magazine and has written, edited or contributed to more than 20 books, including "Scientific Paranormal Investigation: How to Solve Unexplained Mysteries," "Tracking the Chupacabra: The Vampire Beast in Fact, Fiction, and Folklore" and “Investigating Ghosts: The Scientific Search for Spirits,” out in fall 2017. His website is www.BenjaminRadford.com.