Experimental wireless EV charger is just as fast as a superfast wired plug, scientists say

A concept for a wireless charging pad in a parking spot with an EV driving over it
Wireless charging has been around since the 19th century, but its use in electric vehicles is relatively new. (Image credit: Chesky_W/Getty Images)

A new type of wireless charging system can power electric vehicle (EV) batteries up to 10 times faster than the fastest available wireless chargers, and it's just as efficient as charging your car with a superfast cable.

Scientists at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee used a "polyphase electromagnetic coupling coil" with rotating magnetic fields to wirelessly charge a Hyundai Kona EV, which has an estimated range of about 261 miles, at 100 kilowatts with 96% efficiency, according to a statement released March 12. 

For reference, the fastest EV charging cables provide between 50 kW and 350 kW in power, while the ones that plug into a home wall socket have a power output of 1 kW, according to the Department of Transportation.

They used their prototype charging device, which has a diameter of 14 inches (36 centimeters), to transfer power to the EV across a 5-inch (13 cm) air gap.

Some of the best availabe wireless chargers provide up to 11 kW of power, while this device can transmit power at 100 kW. (Image credit: Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL))

The goal of research like this is to integrate wireless charging devices into the road — in parking spots, for example. That way, drivers no longer need to plug their cars into dedicated charging infrastructure with bulky cables.

Related: Future electric cars could go more than 600 miles on a single charge thanks to battery-boosting gel

"We've achieved the highest power density in the world for a wireless charging system for this class of vehicle," Omer Onar, a researcher at ORNL who was involved in the work, said in the statement. "Our technology reaches power densities 8-10 times higher than conventional coil technology and can increase battery charge state by 50% in under 20 minutes."

Wireless charging has been around since the 19th century, when Nikola Tesla demonstrated magnetic resonant coupling. By creating a magnetic field, electricity can be transferred through the air between a transmitting circuit and a receiving circuit. The technology exists on a small scale in phones and smartwatches, but wireless charging in EVs is relatively new.

There are few such products available on the market. One of the best available right now, for example, is made by Plugless Power, which offers between 3.3 kW and 7.2 kW wireless charging stations that can be integrated into parking spaces.

Another wireless charger, built by WiTricity, offers just 11 kW. Conventional wireless charging relies on a large magnetic loop antenna, in the form of a copper coil, to create an oscillating magnetic field. This creates a current in a receiving antenna. Each of the coils then resonate at the same frequency and power can be transferred.

In the polyphase-coil system, electric power utilizes more than one alternating current (AC) phase using two or more conductive materials, which rotate their voltage cycles with a fixed and defined phase between the different waves.

This means the polyphase electromagnetic coils transmit charge in multiple phases. As a result, the magnetic field is more uniform, which allows for more consistent and higher power transfer for a given size, ORNL scientists said in a 2022 paper. Polyphase couplers are also more efficient, meaning less power is lost over longer distances, also allowing for a reduction in the size of coils to achieve the same charge rate as conventional coil technology does.

The achievement is especially notable because the prototype wireless charging device is small enough to be practical, given its size, Onar said in the statement.

Keumars Afifi-Sabet
Channel Editor, Technology

Keumars is the technology editor at Live Science. He has written for a variety of publications including ITPro, The Week Digital, ComputerActive, The Independent, The Observer, Metro and TechRadar Pro. He has worked as a technology journalist for more than five years, having previously held the role of features editor with ITPro. He is an NCTJ-qualified journalist and has a degree in biomedical sciences from Queen Mary, University of London. He's also registered as a foundational chartered manager with the Chartered Management Institute (CMI), having qualified as a Level 3 Team leader with distinction in 2023.

  • RSMilward
    "100kW" is NOT a rate! A rate is an amount over a period of time. Do you mean 100kW per hour, per day? Please clarify!
    Reply
  • NightFlight
    RSMilward said:
    "100kW" is NOT a rate! A rate is an amount over a period of time. Do you mean 100kW per hour, per day? Please clarify!
    Let's not be such pedants, of course the unit is per hour, no other units fit and it's the most common to the layman. It can be assumed. Yes, this is a public, lay article and we can assume without affect.
    Reply
  • wattisarate
    I can't believe I registered just to correct a year-old comment.

    RSMilward said:
    "100kW" is NOT a rate! A rate is an amount over a period of time. Do you mean 100kW per hour, per day? Please clarify!

    Watt is indeed a rate - it's one joule per second. 100kW is 100,000 joules per second. The timespan is built into the definition of the unit.
    Just think of a 60W lightbulb - it doesn't use "60" of something total, over its whole lifespan. It uses 60W continuously as long as it's on, i.e. 60 joules per second.

    NightFlight said:
    Let's not be such pedants, of course the unit is per hour, no other units fit and it's the most common to the layman. It can be assumed. Yes, this is a public, lay article and we can assume without affect.

    No. Please just google something before spouting nonsense about it.
    Reply
  • NightFlight
    Right, it is a rate fundamental. I think most people are accustomed to this value expressed on paper over a period. Ie, as seen on a bill as cost. Periodization lends us a tangent as a work unit. Eventually these work units get expressed as small green peices of paper.

    How much work did a 1ton vehicle do hurling down the road at 100kph? Well nothing unless we specify for how long. Is momentum an analogy to power or did I just totally bust it trying to stick inertia onto electrons? Trying to wrap my head around settle times sends me loopy, since there's no mass!

    There is no spoon. Turtles all the way down I say.
    Reply