James Webb telescope finds an 'extreme' glow coming from 90% of the universe's earliest galaxies

A James Webb Space Telescope image of the galaxy MACS0647-JD spotted just 400 million years after the Big Bang.
A James Webb Space Telescope image of the galaxy MACS0647-JD spotted just 400 million years after the Big Bang. (Image credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, & STScI, APagan (STScI)/ Alamy Live News via Digitaleye)

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has discovered that nearly all of the universe's earliest galaxies were filled with dazzling gas clouds that blazed brighter than the emerging stars within them — and it could help solve a mystery that threatens to break cosmology.

Forming as early as 500 million years after the Big Bang, some early galaxies have been seen glowing so brightly that they shouldn't exist: Brightnesses of their magnitude should come only from massive galaxies with as many stars as the Milky Way, yet the galaxies took shape in a fraction of the time our galaxy took to form.

The discovery threatened to upend physicists' understanding of galaxy formation and even the standard model of cosmology, which states that a few million years after the Big Bang (13.8 billion years ago) energy condensed into matter from which the first stars slowly coalesced. Yet when the JWST came online, it saw far too many stars.  

Related: James Webb telescope detects alien planet with clouds made of quartz

Now, astronomers have found a possible answer: a large group of 12 billion-year-old galaxies almost 90% of which were wreathed in bright gas that — after being ignited by light from the surrounding stars — triggered intense bursts of star formation as the gas cooled. The new research has been accepted for publication  in The Astrophysical Journal.

"Our paper proves that interactions with the neighboring galaxies are responsible for the unusual brightness of early galaxies," lead author Anshu Gupta, an astrophysicist at Curtin University in Australia, told Live Science in an email. "The explosion of star formation triggered by the interactions could also explain the more massive nature of early galaxies." 

Astronomers discovered the bright gas clouds in data collected as part of JWST's Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey, which used three of the telescope's instruments to collect infrared images of galaxies before analyzing their spectra.

By peering at the frequencies of light the galaxies emitted, the researchers discovered spikes of "extreme emission features" — a clear sign that the gas was capturing light from nearby stars before reemitting it.

"Gas cannot emit light on its own," Gupta said. "But the young, massive stars emit just the right type of radiation to excite the gas — and the early galaxies have lots of young stars."

After comparing this emission spectrum with those found in newer galaxies populating today's universe, the researchers found that around 1% had similar features. The researchers said that by studying these later galaxies, which are easier to measure, they will gain important insight into the earlier galaxies and the beginnings of the universe's chemistry.

"The chemical elements that make up everything tangible on Earth and the universe, except hydrogen and helium, originated in the cores of distant stars," Gupta said. "So, it is critical to understand the conditions surrounding galaxies and stars in the early universe for us to better understand our own world today."

Ben Turner
Staff Writer

Ben Turner is a U.K. based staff writer at Live Science. He covers physics and astronomy, among other topics like tech and climate change. He graduated from University College London with a degree in particle physics before training as a journalist. When he's not writing, Ben enjoys reading literature, playing the guitar and embarrassing himself with chess.

  • El Dreddog
    Wow,
    Again, why are there so many different guesstimations on the universe? We talk about the big bang, and then in the very next breath, it's being claimed that the Big bang is wrong. I understand that the universe is huge, and that has Michiro Kaku says, All physics are local. As a matter of fact, Tyson refers to the same thing. Maybe it would be beneficial to refrain from posting some of these things, until, maybe there is more information from researchers.
    Reply
  • TorbjornLarsson
    The early universe was a busy place:
    We suspect that gas cooling induced by strong interactions and/or major mergers could be triggering the extreme emission lines, and the increased merger rate might be responsible for the over-abundance of EELGs at z > 6.
    Reply
  • TorbjornLarsson
    El Dreddog said:
    Wow,
    Again, why are there so many different guesstimations on the universe? We talk about the big bang, and then in the very next breath, it's being claimed that the Big bang is wrong. I understand that the universe is huge, and that has Michiro Kaku says, All physics are local. As a matter of fact, Tyson refers to the same thing. Maybe it would be beneficial to refrain from posting some of these things, until, maybe there is more information from researchers.
    There are many scientists that wish that the Webb telescope (or other observations) turn over the consensus model for professional reasons (since academia advances are hard).

    I note that you rely on general popularizers instead of scientists to form your ideas about the science, and as a physicist I would never do that. (Admittedly I find both being obnoxious showmen.)

    I would read the paper that was worked out by researchers. And other papers, to reference a productive researcher that popularize (and isn't obnoxious) I would recommend Dr Becky's Youtube channel. They have several times presented recent research that makes the claims that "Big bang" space expansion theory wrong themselves wrong. And the article points to yet another result that problematize the claims of a hopeful minority and outsider popularizers both.

    Some of their examples:
    "JWST's "too massive" galaxy problem solved?! | A non-universal IMF"
    W4KH1Jw6HBIView: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4KH1Jw6HBI&ab_channel=Dr.Becky
    "HUGE blow for alternate theory of gravity MOND" HlNSvrYygRcView: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlNSvrYygRc&ab_channel=Dr.Becky

    Other examples:
    "More JWST Observations are Finding Fewer Early Massive Galaxies" https://www.universetoday.com/163648/more-jwst-observations-are-finding-fewer-early-massive-galaxies/
    Below is also ongoing and exciting research of star bursts masquerading as Webb's massive galaxies, connecting back to how early galaxies now are thought to have too little mass to rapidly recirculate gas and having a shared context with the "extreme glow" paper:
    "Bursts of star formation explain mysterious brightness at cosmic dawn"
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/10/231003104735.htm#google_vignette"Quenched Galaxies in the Early Universe"
    https://www.universetoday.com/163587/quenched-galaxies-in-the-early-universe/
    Reply
  • GoodOlDan
    Genesis 1:3-25 NLT. Then God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. And God saw that the light was good. Then he separated the light from the darkness.

    Any questions?
    Reply