'Young Blood' Transfusions to Prevent Aging Are Unproven and Risky, FDA Warns
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Delivered Daily
Daily Newsletter
Sign up for the latest discoveries, groundbreaking research and fascinating breakthroughs that impact you and the wider world direct to your inbox.
Once a week
Life's Little Mysteries
Feed your curiosity with an exclusive mystery every week, solved with science and delivered direct to your inbox before it's seen anywhere else.
Once a week
How It Works
Sign up to our free science & technology newsletter for your weekly fix of fascinating articles, quick quizzes, amazing images, and more
Delivered daily
Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
Once a month
Watch This Space
Sign up to our monthly entertainment newsletter to keep up with all our coverage of the latest sci-fi and space movies, tv shows, games and books.
Once a week
Night Sky This Week
Discover this week's must-see night sky events, moon phases, and stunning astrophotos. Sign up for our skywatching newsletter and explore the universe with us!
Join the club
Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.
If you think the idea of getting a transfusion with "young blood" to ward off aging sounds far-fetched, well, U.S. health officials agree.
Today (Feb. 19), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said it was concerned about reports of "bad actors" offering infusions of blood plasma from young people to purportedly treat age-related conditions and diseases, such a memory loss, Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease. Such treatments are not only unproven, but they also come with potentially serious risks, the agency said.
"Simply put, we're concerned that some patients are being preyed upon by unscrupulous actors touting treatments of plasma from young donors as cures and remedies," Dr. Scott Gottlieb, the FDA commissioner, and Dr. Peter Marks, director of the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, said in a statement. "Such treatments have no proven clinical benefits for the uses for which these clinics are advertising them and are potentially harmful."
Plasma is the liquid portion of blood and does not contain blood cells. Transfusions with plasma can be lifesaving for people who experience physical trauma or who have certain diseases or conditions that prevent their blood from clotting properly.
But the FDA has not approved plasma transfusions for the treatment of age-related conditions and diseases, and these treatments are not known to be safe or effective.
"We strongly discourage consumers from pursuing this therapy outside of clinical trials" that have received appropriate review and regulatory oversight, Gottlieb and Marks said.
What's more, some reports indicate that these unapproved transfusions may involve large volumes of plasma, and such large doses are linked with "significant risks," such as infections, allergic reactions, and breathing and cardiovascular problems, the statement said.
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
The FDA urged consumers to consult their doctors before considering such treatments. In addition, clinical trials that are testing blood transfusions for purposes not yet approved by the FDA must have an "investigational new drug (IND) application" with the FDA, which means that the agency has reviewed the experimental therapy to make sure it is safe. So if the blood transfusion therapy is said to be offered as part of a clinical trial, people should ask to see the IND number and a copy of the FDA's communication acknowledging the application, the agency said.
- Wishful Thinking: 6 'Magic Bullet' Cures That Don't Exist
- 6 Big Mysteries of Alzheimer's Disease
- 8 Tips for Healthy Aging
Originally published on Live Science.

Rachael is a Live Science contributor, and was a former channel editor and senior writer for Live Science between 2010 and 2022. She has a master's degree in journalism from New York University's Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program. She also holds a B.S. in molecular biology and an M.S. in biology from the University of California, San Diego. Her work has appeared in Scienceline, The Washington Post and Scientific American.
