'It's had 1.1 billion years to accumulate': Helium reservoir in Minnesota has 'mind-bogglingly large' concentrations

Three pictures showing Pulsar Helium's helium drilling rig and drill bit in Minnesota.
From left to right: Pulsar Helium's Jetstream #1 appraisal well in Minnesota; the drill bit used for spudding the well; and site preparations before drilling started in January. (Image credit: Pulsar Helium Inc.)

A recently discovered helium reservoir in Minnesota boasts "mind-bogglingly" high concentrations of the gas that are even greater than initially thought, potentially paving the way for commercial extraction.

Resource exploration company Pulsar Helium, Inc. announced the discovery of helium stores in late February, after a drill just outside of Babbitt, in northern Minnesota, located gas deposits at depths of 2,200 feet (670 meters). Initial measurements showed helium concentrations of 12.4% — which "is just a dream," Thomas Abraham-James, the president and CEO of Pulsar Helium, told CBS News at the time. But new laboratory readings have surpassed those results.

The new tests reveal helium concentrations up to 13.8%, which are the highest the industry has ever seen, according to a statement. "That's just a mind-bogglingly large number, because really anything that's 0.3% or 0.5% helium or greater is of interest," Abraham-James told Live Science. 

Despite being the second-most abundant gas in the universe, helium is scarce on Earth and only forms through nuclear fusion or the radioactive decay of uranium and thorium. 

Related: Massive hydrogen reservoir discovered beneath an Albanian mine could be an untapped source of clean energy

Normally, helium is obtained as a byproduct of natural gas production, as it accumulates underground in pockets of methane and other hydrocarbons. Minnesota is one of just a handful of locations globally where helium is known to exist without hydrocarbons — the others being in Greenland and southern and eastern Africa. These sites all feature a crust of granite rock rich in uranium and thorium, as well as a rift system that fractures the rock to expose the helium produced through radioactive decay. A dose of volcanism then releases helium atoms from the rock.

"The last ingredient that you need is somewhere for that all to be trapped, and so that could be a sedimentary basin or, like for our project, an igneous rock," Abraham-James said. "For us, it's had 1.1 billion years to accumulate in there, which may account for why the concentration is so high."

The wellhead of Pulsar Helium's drilling site in Minnesota. (Image credit: Thomas Abraham-James)

Liquid helium is important today as it is used as a coolant in nuclear reactors, rockets, superconductors and medical diagnostic equipment, but due to a limited supply, some sectors are already facing shortages.

"It's pretty dire out there," Abraham-James said.

The recently discovered helium deposits in Minnesota could address critical shortages in the U.S. with minimal losses through transportation, Abraham-James said. 

Helium is notoriously difficult to store, and depending on the container, it begins to break down between 25 and 45 days after it is extracted. Most of the world's helium is mixed with hydrocarbons and wafts out of the ground uncontrollably, Abraham-James said, at which point the clock starts ticking to get it to customers. The reservoir in Minnesota, however, could provide helium on tap.

"Effectively, the reservoir is the storage itself," Abraham-James said. "There's not that sense of emergency that you must get it out right now." There would be no need for fracking, he added, as the gas naturally rises to the surface. A production facility at the rig site could then process the helium as and when needed. 

Experts are reviewing data collected at the site to establish the size and properties of the reservoir. More measurements are needed to estimate the pressure under which the gas is stored and the flow rates that can be expected once it is released from that pressure.

"That's really just as important as high concentration, because you want to know how much of the gas is voluntarily coming out of the ground — a bit like cracking a soda can," Abraham-Jones said. Results are expected by the middle of the year and will determine whether the site is suitable for commercial production, he said.

Sascha Pare
Trainee staff writer

Sascha is a U.K.-based trainee staff writer at Live Science. She holds a bachelor’s degree in biology from the University of Southampton in England and a master’s degree in science communication from Imperial College London. Her work has appeared in The Guardian and the health website Zoe. Besides writing, she enjoys playing tennis, bread-making and browsing second-hand shops for hidden gems.

  • WCPlace
    Helium is a stable non radioactive element, it does not "break down" in storage!
    Reply
  • Geezer345
    While this, and the news about the Albanian Hydrogen Deposit, are good news; I would add a "caveat". The reason We have these deposits available, is that they were probably "trapped" as the Earth accumulated, and formed.

    Both Hydrogen and Helium, are very "light" gasses, and in their "elemental" form, the Earth's Gravity is too "weak" to hold them. Fortunately, pure Hydrogen is very reactive, and will readily combine, with heavier gasses. Helium, however, is a "noble" gas, and will remain, in its "elemental" form, as will some pure Hydrogen. Both will therefore, rise to the top of the Atmosphere, and eventually, will be lost, forever; to the Earth. Some research, and the Composition of Our Atmosphere, suggest this.

    I would suggest, and argue; that We should Not, be "profligate", in the use of these gasses, or any gasses, below Nitrogen and Oxygen, on the Periodic Table. The Earth's Gravity is too weak, to hold them, and We may lose, what We do have, if We aren't careful. Once "gone", they will be "gone", for good.
    Reply
  • Mr T
    WCPlace said:
    Helium is a stable non radioactive element, it does not "break down" in storage!
    Yes, it begs the question as to how someone with multiple science degrees, who writes for multiple publications, can not know the basics of the most common elements in the universe. But, I run across this constantly nowadays, writers with degrees in this and that who have no clue what they are talking about. It's as if no-one is checking their work.
    Reply
  • kevin75025
    WCPlace said:
    Helium is a stable non radioactive element, it does not "break down" in storage!
    presumably relative to the helium selling, this could be in reference to the gas permeation into the storage container. doubt the effect would be all that large, wonder if that startup CEOs was exaggerating or what.
    also the article mentions liquid helium cooling of nuclear reactions, which seems dubious. that would seem to evaporate your whole tank in milliseconds. LHe is used in quantum computing though.
    Reply
  • Hatchetman
    Mr T said:
    Yes, it begs the question as to how someone with multiple science degrees, who writes for multiple publications, can not know the basics of the most common elements in the universe. But, I run across this constantly nowadays, writers with degrees in this and that who have no clue what they are talking about. It's as if no-one is checking their work.
    It seems the "Trainee writer" mixed the storage of helium in man made containers and natural "containers". I believe bottles are a safe way to store helium but the person being interviewed used the same word for the gas being contained underground, in which case it makes perfect sense. The gas has been there for millions of years, but when you break the layer that keeps it there, it seeps out like bubbles from a can of soda and it cannot be closed again.
    Its understandable of course that an expert thinks its as clear to others as to him, that a journalist who thinks she understands it does not suspect anything is wrong and believes the expert instead of the gut feeling older writers develop against BS, nobody has time or money to check the facts and tired editors spell check instead of fact check.
    I dont blame any single person here, but its the product of the times. People want quality news with quality writing, but nobody is willing to pay for the time and work quality requires.
    Stanley spent half a year looking for Livingstone in Africa. Today you have half an hour, and that is unpaid work.
    Reply